Suppr超能文献

使用 TIDieR 报告清单描述试验招募干预措施的内容:系统方法学综述。

Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruiting participants to clinical trials is an ongoing challenge, and relatively little is known about what recruitment strategies lead to better recruitment. Recruitment interventions can be considered complex interventions, often involving multiple components, targeting a variety of groups, and tailoring to different groups. We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting checklist (which comprises 12 items recommended for reporting complex interventions) to guide the assessment of how recruitment interventions are described. We aimed to (1) examine to what extent we could identify information about each TIDieR item within recruitment intervention studies, and (2) observe additional detail for each item to describe useful variation among these studies.

METHODS

We identified randomized, nested recruitment intervention studies providing recruitment or willingness to participate rates from two sources: a Cochrane review of trials evaluating strategies to improve recruitment to randomized trials, and the Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls database. First, we assessed to what extent authors reported information about each TIDieR item. Second, we developed descriptive categorical variables for 7 TIDieR items and extracting relevant quotes for the other 5 items.

RESULTS

We assessed 122 recruitment intervention studies. We were able to extract information relevant to most TIDieR items (e.g., brief rationale, materials, procedure) with the exception of a few items that were only rarely reported (e.g., tailoring, modifications, planned/actual fidelity). The descriptive variables provided a useful overview of study characteristics, with most studies using various forms of informational interventions (55%) delivered at a single time point (90%), often by a member of the research team (59%) in a clinical care setting (41%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our TIDieR-based variables provide a useful description of the core elements of complex trial recruitment interventions. Recruitment intervention studies report core elements of complex interventions variably; some process elements (e.g., mode of delivery, location) are almost always described, while others (e.g., duration, fidelity) are reported infrequently, with little indication of a reason for their absence. Future research should explore whether these TIDieR-based variables can form the basis of an approach to better reporting of elements of successful recruitment interventions.

摘要

背景

招募临床试验参与者是一个持续存在的挑战,对于哪些招募策略能带来更好的招募效果,我们知之甚少。招募干预措施可被视为复杂干预措施,通常涉及多个组成部分,针对多种群体,并针对不同群体进行调整。我们使用干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)报告清单(其中包含 12 项建议用于报告复杂干预措施)来指导评估招募干预措施的描述情况。我们的目的是:(1)确定在招募干预研究中能够确定每个 TIDieR 项目的信息程度;(2)观察每个项目的其他详细信息,以描述这些研究之间有用的差异。

方法

我们从两个来源确定了随机嵌套的招募干预研究,这些研究提供了招募或参与意愿率:一项评估提高随机试验招募率策略的 Cochrane 综述,以及在线临床试验资源数据库。首先,我们评估了作者报告每个 TIDieR 项目信息的程度。其次,我们为 7 个 TIDieR 项目开发了描述性分类变量,并为其他 5 个项目提取了相关引述。

结果

我们评估了 122 项招募干预研究。我们能够提取与大多数 TIDieR 项目相关的信息(例如,简要的基本原理、材料、程序),但有几个项目很少报告(例如,定制、修改、计划/实际保真度)。描述性变量提供了研究特征的有用概述,大多数研究使用各种形式的信息干预措施(55%)在单个时间点(90%)进行,通常由研究团队成员(59%)在临床护理环境中(41%)进行。

结论

基于 TIDieR 的变量为复杂试验招募干预措施的核心要素提供了有用的描述。招募干预研究报告复杂干预措施的核心要素存在差异;一些过程要素(例如,传递方式、地点)几乎总是被描述,而其他要素(例如,持续时间、保真度)很少被报告,几乎没有说明其缺失的原因。未来的研究应该探讨这些基于 TIDieR 的变量是否可以作为更好地报告成功招募干预措施要素的方法的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86f3/11000410/4b77c57fd85e/12874_2024_2195_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验