• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高健康研究中的同意率:快速系统评价。

Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Global Health Ethics Team, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 13;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01000-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-020-01000-3
PMID:32404063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7222594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enrolment in a research study requires the participant's informed consent. In the case of minors, informed consent of the respective legal guardian is obtained in conjunction with informed assent of the underage p articipant. Since comprehension of the information provided may be limited, effective interventions to improve understanding should be identified. Thus, it is the objective of this study to review quantitative studies that tested interventions to improve the understanding of information provided during assent processes in health research. The studied population consisted of minors that participated or were willing to participate in research. The primary outcome was the level of comprehension after intervention.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in eleven databases including regional databases: PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycINFO, CINAHL, POPLINE, AIM, LILACS, WPRIM, IMSEAR, and IMEMR and included references from inception of the database until July 2018 except PubMed which spanned the period from May 2013 to July 2018. Search terms focused on Informed Consent/Assent, Minors, and Comprehension. To complement the search, reference lists of retrieved publications were additionally searched. We included all quantitative studies that were conducted in minors, tested an intervention, covered assent processes in health research, and assessed comprehension. One reviewer screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts to determine eligibility and collected data on study design, population, intervention, methods, outcome, and for critical appraisal. Interventions comprised enhanced paper forms, interspersed questions, multimedia format, and others.

RESULTS

Out of 7089 studies initially identified, 19 studies comprising 2805 participants and conducted in seven countries were included in the review. Fourteen studies (74 %) tested an intervention against control and ten (53 %) were randomized controlled trials. Heterogeneous methodology as well as incomplete outcome and statistical reporting impaired the reliability of the collected data. Positive effects were suggested for use of enhanced paper forms, interspersed questions, use of pie charts, and organizational factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving assent in health research is an under-researched area with little reliable evidence. While some interventions are proposed to improve understanding in assent processes, further investigation is necessary to be able to give evidence-based recommendations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: 106808.

摘要

背景

参加研究需要参与者的知情同意。对于未成年人,在获得相应法定监护人同意的同时,也需要获得未成年参与者的同意。由于未成年人对所提供信息的理解可能有限,因此需要确定有效的干预措施来提高他们的理解程度。因此,本研究的目的是综述旨在提高健康研究中同意过程中信息理解的干预措施的定量研究。研究人群由参与或愿意参与研究的未成年人组成。主要结果是干预后的理解水平。

方法

在包括区域数据库在内的 11 个数据库中进行了系统搜索:PubMed、Web of Science、ERIC、PsycINFO、CINAHL、POPLINE、AIM、LILACS、WPRIM、IMSEAR 和 IMEMR,除了 PubMed 从 2013 年 5 月到 2018 年 7 月,其他数据库均从数据库建立开始纳入参考资料。搜索词集中于知情同意/同意、未成年人和理解。为了补充搜索,还额外搜索了检索文献的参考文献列表。我们纳入了所有在未成年人中进行的、测试干预措施、涵盖健康研究同意过程、并评估理解程度的定量研究。一位评审员筛选标题、摘要和全文以确定合格性,并收集研究设计、人群、干预措施、方法、结果和关键评价的数据。干预措施包括增强型纸质表格、穿插问题、多媒体格式等。

结果

最初确定的 7089 项研究中,有 19 项研究(共 2805 名参与者)来自七个国家,被纳入综述。14 项研究(74%)针对对照测试了干预措施,其中 10 项(53%)为随机对照试验。不同的方法以及不完整的结果和统计报告降低了所收集数据的可靠性。增强型纸质表格、穿插问题、使用饼图和组织因素的使用被认为具有积极效果。

结论

提高健康研究中的同意率是一个研究不足的领域,可靠证据较少。虽然提出了一些干预措施来提高同意过程中的理解程度,但需要进一步调查,以便能够提供基于证据的建议。

试验注册

PROSPERO ID:106808。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27e/7222594/1cf048eb1c82/12874_2020_1000_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27e/7222594/f91fb2c9c144/12874_2020_1000_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27e/7222594/1cf048eb1c82/12874_2020_1000_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27e/7222594/f91fb2c9c144/12874_2020_1000_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27e/7222594/1cf048eb1c82/12874_2020_1000_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.提高健康研究中的同意率:快速系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 13;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01000-3.
2
Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.提高研究知情同意过程中的理解:54 项随机对照试验中测试的干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 23;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.
3
Development and evaluation of a web-based assent for adolescents considering an HIV vaccine trial.针对考虑参与HIV疫苗试验的青少年的基于网络的同意书的开发与评估。
AIDS Care. 2015;27(8):1005-13. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1024096. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
[Key considerations in the process of assent in children and adolescents: an integrative review].[儿童和青少年同意过程中的关键考虑因素:一项综合综述]
Andes Pediatr. 2024 Feb;95(1):91-106. doi: 10.32641/andespediatr.v95i1.4968.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Improving comprehension, recall and attention using multimedia-informed assent among pediatric oncology patients: A comparative randomized controlled trial.使用多媒体知情同意提高儿科肿瘤患者的理解、记忆和注意力:一项比较随机对照试验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Aug;69(8):e29785. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29785. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
Ethics of Online Assent: Comparing Strategies to Ensure Informed Assent Among Youth.在线同意的伦理:比较确保青少年知情同意的策略
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624809. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research.一项优化青少年对生物医学研究同意的方法的随机研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):189-197. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1251507. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.提高研究参与者对研究知情同意理解的干预措施:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1593-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Consent Comprehension Among Kenyan Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents: Comparison of Enhanced and Standard Consenting Procedures.肯尼亚青少年、年轻成年人和家长的同意理解评估:增强型和标准同意程序的比较。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Mar;74(3):605-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
2
Comprehension by Caregivers and Adolescents of Clinical Trial Information Delivered via Multimedia Video Versus Conventional Practice: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.通过多媒体视频与传统方式向护理人员和青少年传达临床试验信息的理解情况:非随机对照试验。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Jun 22;6:e44252. doi: 10.2196/44252.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research.一项优化青少年对生物医学研究同意的方法的随机研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):189-197. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1251507. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
2
Ethics of Online Assent: Comparing Strategies to Ensure Informed Assent Among Youth.在线同意的伦理:比较确保青少年知情同意的策略
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624809. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
3
Adolescents with substance use disorder and assent/consent: Empirical data on understanding biobank risks in genomic research.
What information and the extent of information to be provided in an informed assent/consent form of pediatric drug trials.
儿科药物临床试验知情同意书/同意书中应提供哪些信息及提供信息的范围。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 16;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00856-y.
4
Four reasons why too many informed consents to clinical research are invalid: a critical analysis of current practices.为何过多的临床研究知情同意书无效:对现行做法的批判性分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 4;12(3):e050543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050543.
有物质使用障碍且表示同意/同意的青少年:基因组研究中生物银行风险理解的实证数据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Feb 1;159:267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.
5
Using digital multimedia to improve parents' and children's understanding of clinical trials.利用数字多媒体提高家长和儿童对临床试验的理解。
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):589-93. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308021. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Development and evaluation of a web-based assent for adolescents considering an HIV vaccine trial.针对考虑参与HIV疫苗试验的青少年的基于网络的同意书的开发与评估。
AIDS Care. 2015;27(8):1005-13. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1024096. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
Comic strips help children understand medical research: targeting the informed consent procedure to children's needs.连环漫画有助于儿童理解医学研究:使知情同意程序符合儿童需求。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Research information for minors: Suitable formats and readability. A systematic review.未成年人研究信息:合适的形式与可读性。一项系统综述。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 May;51(5):505-511. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12762. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
9
Evaluation of an intervention among adolescents to reduce preventive misconception in HIV vaccine clinical trials.评估一项针对青少年的干预措施,以减少HIV疫苗临床试验中的预防性误解。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Aug;55(2):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
Comprehension of a simplified assent form in a vaccine trial for adolescents.青少年疫苗试验中简化同意书的理解。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):410-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101286. Epub 2013 Jan 24.