Prince Anya E R, Cadigan R Jean, Whipple Warren, Davis Arlene M
a Department of Social Medicine , School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
c Hospital Ethics Committee , UNC Medical Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):161-169. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1338315. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
This pilot study reports on a survey regarding recruitment, appointment, and training of members for health care ethics committees (HCECs).
Past studies have examined HCECs, but have focused on the roles of the committees and the broad makeup of membership. Thus, our study fills an important knowledge gap in trends of membership recruitment and appointment processes employed by HCECs to comprise their membership.
We posted our survey on several bioethics listservs between June and August 2015. Of the 103 respondents that started the survey, 59 were eligible for inclusion based on our criteria. We analyzed survey results descriptively and qualitatively.
Overall we found no unifying standards of recruitment or appointment across the 59 respondents. Additionally, while responding committees varied in the professional backgrounds and attributes they valued in potential members, we found that most respondents valued traits of the applicants over specific knowledge or skills.
This study provides a first look into how HCECs recruit members. Future research is needed to better understand the complexities of the issues discovered during this study, given that the HCEC members appointed are the individuals who fulfill committee obligations.
本试点研究报告了一项关于医疗保健伦理委员会(HCECs)成员招募、任命和培训的调查。
过去的研究对医疗保健伦理委员会进行了考察,但重点关注的是委员会的角色和成员的广泛构成。因此,我们的研究填补了医疗保健伦理委员会在招募成员和任命过程趋势方面的重要知识空白。
我们在2015年6月至8月期间在几个生物伦理邮件列表上发布了我们的调查问卷。在开始调查的103名受访者中,根据我们的标准,有59名符合纳入条件。我们对调查结果进行了描述性和定性分析。
总体而言,我们发现59名受访者中没有统一的招募或任命标准。此外,虽然做出回应的委员会在他们对潜在成员看重的专业背景和属性方面存在差异,但我们发现大多数受访者更看重申请人的特质而非特定的知识或技能。
本研究首次探讨了医疗保健伦理委员会如何招募成员。鉴于被任命的医疗保健伦理委员会成员是履行委员会义务的人员,需要进行进一步的研究以更好地理解本研究中发现的问题的复杂性。