Suppr超能文献

医疗保健伦理委员会的成员招募与培训:一项全国性试点调查的结果

Membership recruitment and training in health care ethics committees: Results from a national pilot survey.

作者信息

Prince Anya E R, Cadigan R Jean, Whipple Warren, Davis Arlene M

机构信息

a Department of Social Medicine , School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

c Hospital Ethics Committee , UNC Medical Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):161-169. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1338315. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This pilot study reports on a survey regarding recruitment, appointment, and training of members for health care ethics committees (HCECs).

BACKGROUND

Past studies have examined HCECs, but have focused on the roles of the committees and the broad makeup of membership. Thus, our study fills an important knowledge gap in trends of membership recruitment and appointment processes employed by HCECs to comprise their membership.

METHODS

We posted our survey on several bioethics listservs between June and August 2015. Of the 103 respondents that started the survey, 59 were eligible for inclusion based on our criteria. We analyzed survey results descriptively and qualitatively.

RESULTS

Overall we found no unifying standards of recruitment or appointment across the 59 respondents. Additionally, while responding committees varied in the professional backgrounds and attributes they valued in potential members, we found that most respondents valued traits of the applicants over specific knowledge or skills.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a first look into how HCECs recruit members. Future research is needed to better understand the complexities of the issues discovered during this study, given that the HCEC members appointed are the individuals who fulfill committee obligations.

摘要

未标注

本试点研究报告了一项关于医疗保健伦理委员会(HCECs)成员招募、任命和培训的调查。

背景

过去的研究对医疗保健伦理委员会进行了考察,但重点关注的是委员会的角色和成员的广泛构成。因此,我们的研究填补了医疗保健伦理委员会在招募成员和任命过程趋势方面的重要知识空白。

方法

我们在2015年6月至8月期间在几个生物伦理邮件列表上发布了我们的调查问卷。在开始调查的103名受访者中,根据我们的标准,有59名符合纳入条件。我们对调查结果进行了描述性和定性分析。

结果

总体而言,我们发现59名受访者中没有统一的招募或任命标准。此外,虽然做出回应的委员会在他们对潜在成员看重的专业背景和属性方面存在差异,但我们发现大多数受访者更看重申请人的特质而非特定的知识或技能。

结论

本研究首次探讨了医疗保健伦理委员会如何招募成员。鉴于被任命的医疗保健伦理委员会成员是履行委员会义务的人员,需要进行进一步的研究以更好地理解本研究中发现的问题的复杂性。

相似文献

3
Are ethics committee members competent to consult?伦理委员会成员具备咨询能力吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Spring;28(1):30-40, 2. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00314.x.
5
Ethics committees: time to experiment with standards.伦理委员会:是时候尝试制定标准了。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Feb 15;120(4):335-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00012.
6
Clergy contributions to healthcare ethics committees.
HEC Forum. 1999 Jun;11(2):140-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1008948110128.
7
Is ethics consultation an elegant distraction?伦理咨询是一种巧妙的干扰吗?
HEC Forum. 1996 Jan;8(1):12-21; discussion 22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00057972.

本文引用的文献

4
The birth of clinical ethics consultation as a profession.
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(1):20-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.863109.
6
Consults for conflict: the history of ethics consultation.冲突咨询:伦理咨询的历史
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2013 Oct;26(4):417-22. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2013.11929025.
10
A national study of ethics committees.一项关于伦理委员会的全国性研究。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):60-4. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139531.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验