Office of Pediatric Therapeutics, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(38):5801-5804. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170926114857.
Historically, neonatal therapeutic interventions were derived from adult therapeutics, and tragedies resulting from this approach have demonstrated differences in the pathophysiologic and developmental processes between neonates and older patients. Over the past 3 decades, researchers and collaborative research networks have made progress in the systematic evaluation of neonatal therapies, yet most neonatal therapeutic products have been incompletely assessed for safety and efficacy, and remain unlabeled and unapproved.
This work describes the legislative initiatives that have stimulated an increase in pediatric and neonatal studies. It highlights examples of successful neonatal drug studies that have resulted in informative neonatal labeling changes, as well as studies that have produced incomplete information. Strategies that support the design of successful studies, including targeting specific subpopulations, modeling and simulation to inform dose selection, innovative design strategies, biomarkers, and endpoints are discussed. Multi-stakeholder consortia such as the International Neonatal Consortium (INC), are working to improve the tools needed for the development of neonatal therapies. These research tools may be used by trial networks to inform consistent and efficient multicenter studies.
More data are needed to support safe and effective use of drugs in neonates, and to obtain these data, a thorough understanding of pathophysiology, drug disposition, biomarkers, and clinically-meaningful endpoints is required. This information will be derived from clinical trials, registries, real-world evidence, and the medical literature. Collaboration of consortia and the development of research networks are essential to achieving these goals.
从历史上看,新生儿治疗干预措施源自成人治疗方法,而这种方法带来的悲剧表明新生儿和老年患者在病理生理和发育过程方面存在差异。在过去的 30 年中,研究人员和合作研究网络在新生儿治疗的系统评估方面取得了进展,但大多数新生儿治疗产品在安全性和疗效方面都未得到充分评估,仍未进行标签标注和批准。
本文描述了刺激儿科和新生儿研究增加的立法举措。它强调了一些成功的新生儿药物研究的例子,这些研究导致了新生儿标签变化的信息丰富化,以及一些提供不完整信息的研究。讨论了支持成功研究设计的策略,包括针对特定亚人群、建模和模拟以告知剂量选择、创新设计策略、生物标志物和终点等。多利益相关者联盟(如国际新生儿联盟(INC))正在努力改进开发新生儿治疗所需的工具。这些研究工具可由试验网络用于告知一致和高效的多中心研究。
需要更多数据来支持在新生儿中安全有效地使用药物,并获得这些数据,需要深入了解病理生理学、药物处置、生物标志物和有临床意义的终点。这些信息将来自临床试验、登记处、真实世界证据和医学文献。联盟的合作和研究网络的发展对于实现这些目标至关重要。