H.L. Heiman is associate professor, Departments of Medicine and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. C.L. O'Brien is instructor, Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. R.H. Curry is professor, Departments of Medicine and Medical Education, and senior associate dean for educational affairs, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. M.M. Green is associate professor, Departments of Medicine and Medical Education, and senior associate dean for medical education, Augusta Webster Office of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. J.F. Baker is professor, Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. R.F. Kushner is professor, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. J.X. Thomas is professor, Departments of Physiology and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. T.C. Corbridge is professor, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. J.F. Corcoran is adjunct associate professor, Departments of Surgery and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. J.M. Hauser is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. P.M. Garcia is professor, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):593-599. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001933.
In 2012, the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine launched a redesigned curriculum addressing the four primary recommendations in the 2010 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching report on reforming medical education. This new curriculum provides a more standardized evaluation of students' competency achievement through a robust portfolio review process coupled with standard evaluations of medical knowledge and clinical skills. It individualizes learning processes through curriculum flexibility, enabling students to take electives earlier and complete clerkships in their preferred order. The new curriculum is integrated both horizontally and vertically, combining disciplines within organ-based modules and deliberately linking elements (science in medicine, clinical medicine, health and society, professional development) and threads (medical decision making, quality and safety, teamwork and leadership, lifestyle medicine, advocacy and equity) across the three phases that replaced the traditional four-year timeline. It encourages students to conduct research in an area of interest and commit to lifelong learning and self-improvement. The curriculum formalizes the process of professional identity formation and requires students to reflect on their experiences with the informal and hidden curricula, which strongly shape their identities.The authors describe the new curriculum structure, explain their approach to each Carnegie report recommendation, describe early outcomes and challenges, and propose areas for further work. Early data from the first cohort to progress through the curriculum show unchanged United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 scores, enhanced student research engagement and career exploration, and improved student confidence in the patient care and professional development domains.
2012 年,西北大学范伯格医学院启动了一项重新设计的课程,以解决 2010 年卡内基教学促进基金会关于改革医学教育的报告中的四项主要建议。该新课程通过强大的组合审查流程以及对医学知识和临床技能的标准评估,为学生的能力实现提供了更标准化的评估。它通过课程灵活性实现学习过程的个性化,使学生能够更早地选修选修课,并按照自己的喜好完成实习。新课程在水平和垂直方向上都进行了整合,将器官为基础的模块内的学科结合起来,并有意将元素(医学中的科学、临床医学、健康与社会、专业发展)和线索(医学决策、质量与安全、团队合作与领导力、生活方式医学、倡导与公平)贯穿取代传统四年时间线的三个阶段。它鼓励学生在感兴趣的领域进行研究,并致力于终身学习和自我提升。该课程使专业身份形成的过程正式化,并要求学生反思他们在非正式和隐性课程中的经历,这些经历强烈影响他们的身份。作者描述了新课程结构,解释了他们对每一项卡内基报告建议的方法,描述了早期的结果和挑战,并提出了进一步工作的领域。第一批通过课程的学生的早期数据显示,美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和第 2 步的分数没有变化,学生的研究参与度和职业探索得到了提高,学生在患者护理和专业发展领域的信心也得到了提高。