• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时进行的手指运动对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)诱发的后效应的影响。

Influence of Concurrent Finger Movements on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Induced Aftereffects.

作者信息

Shirota Yuichiro, Terney Daniella, Antal Andrea, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August UniversityGöttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Sep 12;11:169. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00169. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00169
PMID:28955211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5600944/
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to have bidirectional influence on the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in resting participants in a polarity-specific manner: anodal tDCS increased and cathodal tDCS decreased them. More recently, the effects of tDCS have been shown to depend on a number of additional factors. We investigated whether a small variety of movements involving target and non-target muscles could differentially modify the efficacy of tDCS. MEPs were elicited from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle, defined as the target muscle, by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1). During M1 tDCS, which lasted for 10 min applying anodal, cathodal, or sham condition, the participants were instructed to squeeze a ball with their right hand (Task 1), to move their right index finger only in the medial (Task 2), in the lateral direction (Task 3), or in medial and lateral direction alternatively (Task 4). Anodal tDCS reduced MEP amplitudes measured in Task 1 and Task 2, but to a lesser extent in the latter. In Task 3, anodal tDCS led to greater MEP amplitudes than cathodal stimulation. Alternating movements resulted in no effect of tDCS on MEP amplitude (Task 4). The results are congruent with the current notion that the aftereffects of tDCS are highly variable relying on a number of factors including the type of movements executed during stimulation.

摘要

据报道,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对静息参与者运动诱发电位(MEP)的波幅具有极性特异性的双向影响:阳极tDCS使其增加,阴极tDCS使其降低。最近,已表明tDCS的效应取决于许多其他因素。我们研究了涉及目标和非目标肌肉的少量运动是否会对tDCS的疗效产生不同的影响。通过对初级运动皮层(M1)进行单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS),从定义为目标肌肉的右手第一背侧骨间肌引出MEP。在持续10分钟的M1 tDCS期间,施加阳极、阴极或假刺激条件,参与者被指示用右手挤压一个球(任务1),仅将右手食指向内(任务2)、向外(任务3)或交替向内和向外移动(任务4)。阳极tDCS降低了任务1和任务2中测量的MEP波幅,但在后者中降低程度较小。在任务3中,阳极tDCS导致的MEP波幅大于阴极刺激。交替运动导致tDCS对MEP波幅无影响(任务4)。这些结果与当前的观点一致,即tDCS的后效应高度可变,取决于许多因素,包括刺激期间执行的运动类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/b216a5a41548/fnbeh-11-00169-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/fcc700f22dbe/fnbeh-11-00169-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/c1300949973a/fnbeh-11-00169-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/b216a5a41548/fnbeh-11-00169-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/fcc700f22dbe/fnbeh-11-00169-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/c1300949973a/fnbeh-11-00169-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d842/5600944/b216a5a41548/fnbeh-11-00169-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Concurrent Finger Movements on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Induced Aftereffects.同时进行的手指运动对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)诱发的后效应的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Sep 12;11:169. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00169. eCollection 2017.
2
Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.经阳极经颅直流电刺激诱导的运动皮质兴奋性增加,有无非疲劳性运动。
Brain Res. 2013 Sep 5;1529:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.026. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.经颅直流电刺激人类运动皮层对皮质脊髓和胼胝体间兴奋性的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):439-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1800-2. Epub 2004 Jan 24.
4
Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.在序列反应时任务期间监测经颅直流电刺激诱发的皮质兴奋性变化。
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar 11;616:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.经颅直流电刺激诱导运动系统的兴奋性调节:一种多模态方法。
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
6
Multimodal Assessment of Precentral Anodal TDCS: Individual Rise in Supplementary Motor Activity Scales With Increase in Corticospinal Excitability.中央前回阳极性经颅直流电刺激的多模态评估:随着皮质脊髓兴奋性增加,辅助运动活动量表的个体上升。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 25;15:639274. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.639274. eCollection 2021.
7
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.经颅直流电刺激在 fMRI 期间对初级运动皮层的影响。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.085. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
8
Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.一种常见的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方案对运动诱发电位的影响在9次测试过程中被发现个体内部差异很大。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of the right M1 further facilitates left M1 excitability during crossed facilitation.在交叉易化过程中,对右侧初级运动皮层进行高清经颅直流电刺激可进一步促进左侧初级运动皮层的兴奋性。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Apr 1;119(4):1266-1272. doi: 10.1152/jn.00861.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS at the motor cortex boosts inhibitory aftereffects.在运动皮层同时应用阴极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可增强抑制性后效应。
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Aug 1;324:108308. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor skill learning in young and older adults.神经生理机制在年轻和老年成年人运动技能学习中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2331-2344. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05599-8. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.预测经颅直流电刺激后皮质脊髓反应个体变异性的措施。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 6;10:487. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487. eCollection 2016.
2
Direct Current Stimulation Alters Neuronal Input/Output Function.直流电刺激改变神经元输入/输出功能。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan-Feb;10(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
健康受试者接受1毫安经颅直流电刺激后运动皮层兴奋性调制的双向变异性。
Physiol Rep. 2016 Aug;4(15). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12884.
4
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.2mA 经颅直流电刺激后的个体内反应一致性和可靠性。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
Membrane resistance and shunting inhibition: where biophysics meets state-dependent human neurophysiology.膜电阻与分流抑制:生物物理学与状态依赖性人类神经生理学的交汇之处。
J Physiol. 2016 May 15;594(10):2719-28. doi: 10.1113/JP271452.
6
Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia.电机皮层电刺激可增强脑卒中后失语症的治疗效果。
Brain. 2016 Apr;139(Pt 4):1152-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww002. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阳极经颅直流电刺激对健康个体运动序列学习的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Feb;102:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
8
Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经颅直流电刺激促进脑卒中后运动学习:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;87(4):345-55. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.不同电流强度下经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)反应的个体间和个体内变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
10
Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS.运动皮质 tDCS 电场的个体间变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):906-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 8.