Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激促进脑卒中后运动学习:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Human Motor Control Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;87(4):345-55. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an attractive protocol for stroke motor recovery. The current systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of tDCS on motor learning post-stroke. Specifically, we determined long-term learning effects by examining motor improvements from baseline to at least 5 days after tDCS intervention and motor practise. 17 studies reported long-term retention testing (mean retention interval=43.8 days; SD=56.6 days) and qualified for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Assessing primary outcome measures for groups that received tDCS and motor practise versus sham control groups created 21 valid comparisons: (1) 16 clinical assessments and (2) 5 motor skill acquisition tests. A random effects model meta-analysis showed a significant overall effect size=0.59 (p<0.0001; low heterogeneity, T(2)=0.04; I(2)=22.75%; and high classic fail-safe N=240). 4 moderator variable analyses revealed beneficial effects of tDCS on long-term motor learning: (1) stimulation protocols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the contralesional hemisphere, or bilateral; (2) recovery stage: subacute or chronic stroke; (3) stimulation timing: tDCS before or during motor practise; and (4) task-specific training or conventional rehabilitation protocols. This robust meta-analysis identified novel long-term motor learning effects with tDCS and motor practise post-stroke.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种很有吸引力的中风后运动恢复方案。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究 tDCS 对中风后运动学习的影响。具体来说,我们通过检查 tDCS 干预和运动练习后至少 5 天的基线到运动改善情况来确定长期学习效果。17 项研究报告了长期保留测试(平均保留间隔=43.8 天;标准差=56.6 天),并符合纳入我们荟萃分析的标准。评估接受 tDCS 和运动练习与假对照的组的主要结果测量值创建了 21 个有效比较:(1)16 项临床评估和(2)5 项运动技能习得测试。随机效应模型荟萃分析显示,总体效应大小具有显著意义=0.59(p<0.0001;低异质性,T(2)=0.04;I(2)=22.75%;高经典失效安全 N=240)。4 项调节变量分析表明,tDCS 对长期运动学习有有益影响:(1)刺激方案:对侧半球给予阳极刺激,对侧半球给予阴极刺激,或双侧刺激;(2)恢复阶段:亚急性或慢性中风;(3)刺激时间:在运动练习之前或期间进行 tDCS;以及(4)任务特异性训练或常规康复方案。这项强大的荟萃分析确定了中风后 tDCS 和运动练习的新的长期运动学习效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验