Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Acetabular Cup Revision.
Hip Pelvis. 2017 Sep;29(3):155-158. doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.155. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
[Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):506-11.
3
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
5
Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1442-1448. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0481.R1.
8
[Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(2):83-8.
9
[Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Mar-Apr;141(2):182-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38652.
10
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7.

引用本文的文献

2
Outcome and EBRA migration analysis of a reconstruction cage in acetabular revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):509-516. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03722-x. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model.
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jul 31;9(7):386-393. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0303.R1. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.
5
The biological acetabular reconstruction with bone allografts in hip revision arthroplasty.
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Aug;103(2):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0573-5. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

2
The challenge of pelvic discontinuity: cup-cage reconstruction does better than conventional cages in mid-term.
Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):195-200. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.31907.
3
Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
4
Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2170-x.
5
Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):428-34. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2126-1.
6
The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Dec;91(12):1555-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22517.
7
Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun;25(4):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
8
Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell.
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7):949-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.019. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
9
The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.024. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
10
Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:188-94. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246533.37006.b0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验