1 Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital and Medical Center Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska.
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, Nebraska.
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):241-244. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0092. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
One goal of pediatric palliative care is to maintain quality of life for children and their families. Quality-of-life investigations may be enhanced by considering clinically important metrics in addition to statistical significance.
The purpose of this study was to longitudinally evaluate the effect of time on quality of life and family impact for pediatric palliative care patients across all diagnoses and ages.
This prospective quality-of-life study included administration of a 23-item PedsQL™ Measurement Model to evaluate for physical, emotional, social, and cognitive dimensions of the child's quality of life and a 36-item PedsQL Family Impact Module to assess for the familial impact at time of initial palliative care consultation, Month 6, and Month 12.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: All pediatric patients who received a palliative care consultation in our Midwestern free-standing children's hospital over a five-year period were included in the longitudinal study (n = 87).
Repeated measures ANOVA was used to investigate how proxy-reported quality of life and family impact changed with time with attentiveness to also follow trends in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) metrics.
The emotional domain showed a statistically significant positive trend over the first six months of palliative care involvement (p = 0.049), while the physical domain (p = 0.028) and daily activity (p = 0.039) showed a positive improvement for the full year. In using a standard of MCID, the physical, emotional, and cognitive domains improved in the quality-of-life scale and the communication, worry, and daily activity domains improved in the family impact scale over 12 months.
In considering quality-of-life analyses for pediatric palliative care programmatic improvements, providers may consider analyzing not only for statistical significance in collective data sets but also for clinically important difference over time.
儿科姑息治疗的目标之一是维持儿童及其家庭的生活质量。除了统计学意义外,考虑临床重要指标可以提高生活质量调查的效果。
本研究旨在纵向评估时间对儿科姑息治疗患者所有诊断和年龄段生活质量和家庭影响的影响。
本前瞻性生活质量研究包括管理 23 项 PedsQLTM 测量模型,以评估儿童生活质量的身体、情感、社会和认知维度,以及 36 项 PedsQL 家庭影响模块,以评估初始姑息治疗咨询时、第 6 个月和第 12 个月的家庭影响。
地点/受试者:在五年期间,我们中西部独立儿童医院接受姑息治疗咨询的所有儿科患者均纳入纵向研究(n=87)。
重复测量方差分析用于研究代理报告的生活质量和家庭影响如何随时间变化,并注意到最小临床重要差异(MCID)指标的趋势。
情感领域在参与姑息治疗的前六个月显示出统计学上的显著正趋势(p=0.049),而身体领域(p=0.028)和日常活动(p=0.039)在整个一年中均显示出积极改善。使用 MCID 标准,身体、情感和认知领域在生活质量量表中得到改善,沟通、担忧和日常活动领域在家庭影响量表中在 12 个月内得到改善。
在考虑儿科姑息治疗计划改进的生活质量分析时,提供者可能不仅要分析集体数据集的统计学意义,还要分析随时间变化的临床重要差异。