Suppr超能文献

开发六个 PROMIS 儿科代理报告项目库。

Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Feb 22;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric self-report should be considered the standard for measuring patient reported outcomes (PRO) among children. However, circumstances exist when the child is too young, cognitively impaired, or too ill to complete a PRO instrument and a proxy-report is needed. This paper describes the development process including the proxy cognitive interviews and large-field-test survey methods and sample characteristics employed to produce item parameters for the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric proxy-report item banks.

METHODS

The PROMIS pediatric self-report items were converted into proxy-report items before undergoing cognitive interviews. These items covered six domains (physical function, emotional distress, social peer relationships, fatigue, pain interference, and asthma impact). Caregivers (n = 25) of children ages of 5 and 17 years provided qualitative feedback on proxy-report items to assess any major issues with these items. From May 2008 to March 2009, the large-scale survey enrolled children ages 8-17 years to complete the self-report version and caregivers to complete the proxy-report version of the survey (n = 1548 dyads). Caregivers of children ages 5 to 7 years completed the proxy report survey (n = 432). In addition, caregivers completed other proxy instruments, PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales Parent Proxy-Report version, PedsQL™ Asthma Module Parent Proxy-Report version, and KIDSCREEN Parent-Proxy-52.

RESULTS

Item content was well understood by proxies and did not require item revisions but some proxies clearly noted that determining an answer on behalf of their child was difficult for some items. Dyads and caregivers of children ages 5-17 years old were enrolled in the large-scale testing. The majority were female (85%), married (70%), Caucasian (64%) and had at least a high school education (94%). Approximately 50% had children with a chronic health condition, primarily asthma, which was diagnosed or treated within 6 months prior to theinterview. The PROMIS proxy sample scored similar or better on the other proxy instruments compared to normative samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial calibration data was provided by a diverse set of caregivers of children with a variety of common chronic illnesses and racial/ethnic backgrounds. The PROMIS pediatric proxy-report item banks include physical function (mobility n = 23; upper extremity n = 29), emotional distress (anxiety n = 15; depressive symptoms n = 14; anger n = 5), social peer relationships (n = 15), fatigue (n = 34), pain interference (n = 13), and asthma impact (n = 17).

摘要

背景

儿科自我报告应被视为衡量儿童患者报告结局(PRO)的标准。然而,当儿童年龄太小、认知受损或病情严重无法完成 PRO 工具时,需要代理报告。本文描述了开发过程,包括代理认知访谈和大样本测试调查方法以及样本特征,这些特征用于为患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)儿科代理报告项目库生成项目参数。

方法

在进行认知访谈之前,将 PROMIS 儿科自报项目转换为代理报告项目。这些项目涵盖六个领域(身体功能、情绪困扰、社会同伴关系、疲劳、疼痛干扰和哮喘影响)。年龄在 5 至 17 岁的儿童的照顾者(n=25)提供了对代理报告项目的定性反馈,以评估这些项目是否存在重大问题。2008 年 5 月至 2009 年 3 月,大规模调查招募了年龄在 8-17 岁的儿童完成自报版本,以及照顾者完成调查的代理报告版本(n=1548 对)。年龄在 5 至 7 岁的儿童的照顾者完成了代理报告调查(n=432)。此外,照顾者还完成了其他代理工具,PedsQLTM 4.0 通用核心量表父母代理报告版本、PedsQLTM 哮喘模块父母代理报告版本和 KIDSCREEN 父母代理报告版本。

结果

代理对项目内容有很好的理解,不需要对项目进行修订,但有些代理明确表示,代表孩子回答一些项目有些困难。年龄在 5-17 岁的儿童及其照顾者被纳入大规模测试。大多数是女性(85%)、已婚(70%)、白种人(64%)和至少有高中教育(94%)。大约 50%的儿童患有慢性疾病,主要是哮喘,在接受采访前的 6 个月内被诊断或治疗过。与常模样本相比,PROMIS 代理样本在其他代理工具上的得分相似或更高。

结论

初始校准数据由一组不同的患有各种常见慢性疾病和种族/族裔背景的儿童的照顾者提供。PROMIS 儿科代理报告项目库包括身体功能(移动 n=23;上肢 n=29)、情绪困扰(焦虑 n=15;抑郁症状 n=14;愤怒 n=5)、社会同伴关系(n=15)、疲劳(n=34)、疼痛干扰(n=13)和哮喘影响(n=17)。

相似文献

1
Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Feb 22;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-22.
4
Using item response theory to enrich and expand the PROMIS® pediatric self report banks.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 25;12:160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0160-x.
5
Item-level informant discrepancies between children and their parents on the PROMIS(®) pediatric scales.
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1921-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0914-2. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9618-4. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
8
An examination of the PROMIS(®) pediatric instruments to assess mobility in children with cerebral palsy.
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2865-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0397-6. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
10
Agreement Between Child Self-report and Caregiver-Proxy Report for Symptoms and Functioning of Children Undergoing Cancer Treatment.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Nov 1;174(11):e202861. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2861. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Describing Multidomain Health Outcomes in Autistic Children in the ECHO Program.
JAACAP Open. 2024 Aug 28;3(3):618-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.05.005. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Content validity of mobility measures in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: engaging clinicians and people with lived experience.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Aug 4;6:1576267. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1576267. eCollection 2025.
4
Ureteroscopy vs Shockwave Lithotripsy to Remove Kidney Stones in Children and Adolescents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25789.
8
Family and Peer Functioning Mediate Associations Between COVID-19 Impact and Child Mental Health.
Curr Psychol. 2024 Jul;43(27):23344-23351. doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-05780-5. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales: an item response theory analysis of the parent proxy report item banks.
Qual Life Res. 2012 Sep;21(7):1223-40. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0025-2. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: an item response theory analysis.
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9969-5. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
4
PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: an item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank.
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
6
An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):595-607. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
7
Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9618-4. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
8
KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2005 Jun;5(3):353-64. doi: 10.1586/14737167.5.3.353.
10
Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature.
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):895-913. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9350-5. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验