ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney and Concord Hospital, Australia.
Centre of Education and Research on Ageing, University of Sydney and Ageing and Alzheimer's Institute, Concord Hospital, Australia.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 May 9;73(6):729-736. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx170.
To determine whether calculated free testosterone (cFT) provides prognostic information independent of serum T for predicting morbidity and mortality in older men in cross-sectional and 5-year longitudinal analyses. We studied men aged ≥70 years at baseline (n = 1,705), 2-year and 5-year measuring serum T (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), SHBG (immunoassay), cFT (an assumption-free empirical formula) together with 24 morbidity and 4 mortality outcomes. For cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses we employed a joint prediction model using generalized estimating equation models adjusted for age, smoking, comorbidities, and body mass index (BMI) with men having both normal T and normal cFT as referent group. Most morbidity and mortality outcomes were predicted by a combination of low T and cFT (LL). By contrast, only a single morbidity outcome in cross-sectional and none in longitudinal analysis was predicted by low T/normal cFT (LN) or normal T/low cFT (NL) without significant LL associations (isolated discordance). While for the few outcomes that predicted morbidity in men with discordances (LN or NL), these predictions only occurred when LL was also significant. Hence, for morbidity or mortality prediction in older men, discordance between cFT and T is unusual and isolated discordance is rare, so that cFT provides minimal independent prognostic information over serum T.
为了确定计算的游离睾酮 (cFT) 是否提供了独立于血清 T 的预后信息,以预测横断面和 5 年纵向分析中老年人的发病率和死亡率。我们研究了基线时年龄≥70 岁的男性(n=1705 人),在 2 年和 5 年时测量了血清 T(液相色谱-质谱法)、SHBG(免疫测定法)、cFT(无假设的经验公式),以及 24 种发病率和 4 种死亡率结果。对于横断面和纵向分析,我们使用广义估计方程模型,结合年龄、吸烟、合并症和体重指数 (BMI) 调整的联合预测模型,将 T 和 cFT 均正常的男性作为参照组。大多数发病率和死亡率结果是由低 T 和 cFT(LL)联合预测的。相比之下,只有一个发病率结果在横断面分析中,没有一个在纵向分析中是由低 T/正常 cFT(LN)或正常 T/低 cFT(NL)预测的,而没有明显的 LL 相关性(孤立的不一致)。虽然对于少数在有差异的男性中预测发病率的结果(LN 或 NL),这些预测仅在 LL 也显著时才发生。因此,对于老年男性的发病率或死亡率预测,cFT 与 T 之间的差异不常见,孤立的差异很少见,因此 cFT 提供的预后信息与血清 T 相比微不足道。