• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对取棒手术的仔细审视:外科医生的观点

Close Examination of the Bar Removal Procedure: The Surgeons' Voice.

作者信息

Alvarez-Garcia Natalia, Ardigo Laura, Bellia-Munzon Gaston, Martinez-Ferro Marcelo

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fundacion Hospitalaria Children's Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Oct;28(5):406-412. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606842. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1606842
PMID:28958094
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Complications of the Nuss procedure are well known. However, publications about intraoperative and postoperative complications of the bar removal procedure (BRP) are scarce. Are they uncommon, unknown, or underreported? Are we ready to face them?

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the profile of complications of the BRP, risk perception, and preventive actions undertaken by the Chest Wall International Group (CWIG) surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 14-question online survey was posted to the members of the CWIG from February 1 to 28, 2016. A qualifying question was setup to ensure respondents performed Nuss' procedure/variations. Overall, 96.5% of respondents ( = 116) qualified.

RESULTS

Despite being experts in the field of chest wall surgery 62.5% of respondents had performed ≤ 100 BRP and only 37.5% ≥ 100 BRP. Intraoperative complications: Severe bleeding from the bar tunnel was experienced at least one time by 28% of respondents and other serious complications, even death, were reported by 12%. Major surgical maneuvers to treat complications (sternotomy, thoracotomy, life-support maneuvers) were implemented by 62% of the surgeons who had experienced acute complications. Postoperative complications: Overall they were experienced at least once by 73.5% of surgeons. Wound seroma was the most cited complication (42%), followed by pneumothorax (27.5%). Surprisingly, one in every four surgeons acknowledged not requesting a routine chest X-ray before patient discharge. Complications versus experience: The report of acute complications increased with cumulative experience: Close to 50% for surgeons with < 100 BRP and as high as 100% for surgeons with > 1,000 BRP. Prevention of complications: Although 64% of surgeons defined the BRP as of intermediate/high risk, most of them (61%) do not prepare the operating room accordingly (availability of blood products, cardiac surgical backup, and perfusionist support).

CONCLUSION

BRP complications are being underestimated and underreported. Publications do not reflect the real spectrum of complications, which includes life-threatening conditions, even death. Preoperative planning and preparation of the operating room should not be disregarded.

摘要

引言

努氏手术的并发症广为人知。然而,关于钢板取出手术(BRP)术中及术后并发症的出版物却很稀少。它们是不常见、不为人知,还是报道不足呢?我们是否做好应对它们的准备了呢?

目的

本研究旨在探讨BRP并发症的情况、风险认知以及胸壁国际组织(CWIG)外科医生采取的预防措施。

材料与方法

2016年2月1日至28日,向CWIG成员发布了一份包含14个问题的在线调查问卷。设置了一个资格问题,以确保受访者进行过努氏手术/其变体手术。总体而言,96.5%的受访者(n = 116)符合资格。

结果

尽管是胸壁外科领域的专家,但62.5%的受访者进行的BRP手术≤100例,只有37.5%的受访者≥100例。术中并发症:28%的受访者至少经历过一次钢板隧道严重出血,12%的受访者报告了其他严重并发症,甚至包括死亡。62%经历过急性并发症的外科医生实施了治疗并发症的主要手术操作(胸骨切开术、开胸手术、生命支持操作)。术后并发症:总体而言,73.5%的外科医生至少经历过一次。伤口血清肿是最常被提及的并发症(42%),其次是气胸(27.5%)。令人惊讶的是,每四位外科医生中就有一位承认在患者出院前未常规要求进行胸部X光检查。并发症与经验:急性并发症的报告随着累积经验的增加而增加:BRP手术<100例的外科医生中近50%有报告,而BRP手术>1000例的外科医生报告率高达100%。并发症的预防:尽管64%的外科医生将BRP定义为中/高风险,但他们中的大多数(61%)并未相应地准备手术室(血液制品的可用性、心脏外科备用人员以及灌注师支持)。

结论

BRP并发症被低估且报告不足。出版物并未反映并发症的真实范围,其中包括危及生命的情况,甚至死亡。术前规划和手术室准备不应被忽视。

相似文献

1
Close Examination of the Bar Removal Procedure: The Surgeons' Voice.对取棒手术的仔细审视:外科医生的观点
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Oct;28(5):406-412. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606842. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Life-threatening complications and mortality of minimally invasive pectus surgery.微创鸡胸手术的危及生命的并发症及死亡率
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):728-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Previously Complicated Nuss Procedure Does Not Preclude Blind Removal of the Bar.既往复杂的努斯手术并不妨碍盲目取出钢板。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;64(1):83-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564690. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
4
Chest Wall Constriction after the Nuss Procedure Identified from Chest Radiograph and Multislice Computed Tomography Shortly after Removal of the Bar.在取出钢板后不久通过胸部X线片和多层计算机断层扫描确定的Nuss手术后胸壁狭窄
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;64(1):70-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555135. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Minor and Major Complications Related to Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.与漏斗胸微创修复相关的轻微和严重并发症
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;28(4):320-326. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670690. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
A simple technique for pectus bar removal using a modified Nuss procedure.一种改良 Nuss 手术的简单胸壁矫正器取出技术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.052.
7
[Clinical analysis of modified technique for pectus bar removal after Nuss procedure].[Nuss手术后鸡胸钢板取出改良技术的临床分析]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Mar;38(3):274-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2013.03.010.
8
Technical modifications in stabilisers and in bar removal in the Nuss procedure.努斯手术中固定器及取出棒的技术改进。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Aug;36(2):410-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.061. Epub 2009 May 22.
9
Perioperative anesthetic and surgical complications of the Nuss procedure.Nuss 手术的围手术期麻醉和手术并发症。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Jun;27(3):436-40. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.10.016. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
10
The Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum Using a Subxiphoid Incision.经剑突下切口微创修复漏斗胸
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Feb;27(1):2-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587585. Epub 2016 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel techniques and future developments in minimally invasive pectus repair.微创鸡胸修复的新技术与未来发展
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4807-4815. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1676. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Impact of delayed removal of pectus bar on outcomes following Nuss repair: a retrospective analysis.漏斗胸 Nuss 修复术后延迟取出胸骨固定矫正器对治疗效果的影响:一项回顾性分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 28;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02685-z.
3
Post bar removal results of pectus deformity patients who underwent minimally invasive correction.
接受微创矫正的漏斗胸畸形患者的术后拔管结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):364-371. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.123797. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
4
The management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review.小儿漏斗胸的治疗:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):208-220. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-361. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Nuss bar removal without straightening is a safe technique: a single center experience.不进行矫直的努氏棒移除术是一种安全的技术:单中心经验
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep;14(9):3335-3342. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-725.
6
Complications following metal bar removal after Nuss repair are rare in a duocentric retrospective evaluation.双中心回顾性评估中,Nuss 修复后金属棒移除的并发症罕见。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1919-1924. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05250-8. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
Current Development of Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (MIRPE).漏斗胸微创修复术(MIRPE)的当前进展
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;9(4):478. doi: 10.3390/children9040478.
8
Minimization of the complications associated with bar removal after the Nuss procedure in adults.成人努氏手术后取出钢板相关并发症的最小化。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 21;15(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01106-1.