Campos Domingos Fernandes, Negromonte Filho Rinaldo Bezerra, Castro Felipe Nalon
Universidade Potiguar , Natal, Brazil.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Oct 9;30(8):680-692. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2016-0140.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the expectations and quality gaps in services provided at city public health clinics in the city of Natal, Brazil, from the perspective of patients and healthcare service providers. Design/methodology/approach The research sample consisted of 1,200 patients who used public health services and 265 providers - doctors, nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists and managers at three health clinics in the city of Natal, Brazil. A scale with 25 health service attributes was used in data collection. Summary statistics and t-test were used to analyze the data. Findings The results show that the providers think that users have lower levels of expectations than those indicated by the users in all attributes. Providers and users have the most approximate insights into what attributes are considered most important: explanations, level of knowledge and attention dispensed by health professionals. Users and providers perceived similar quality gaps for most of the attributes. The gaps were statistically the same, when comparing the mean quality shortcomings by means of a Student's test, considering a significance level of 5 percent, obtained independently by the manifestation of users and providers. Research limitations/implications The results reveal only a photograph of the moment. The study did not consider the differences that may exist between groups with different income levels, genders or age groups. A qualitative study could improve the understanding of the differences and coincidences of the diverse points of views. A more advanced research could even study possibilities so that health managers could promote changes in the service, some of them low cost, as the health professionals training for contact with patients. Practical implications The evaluation of the service quality complemented by the matrix of opportunities, importance × quality gaps generates information to help make decisions in the rational allocation of available resources and improvement of the quality of the service delivered to patients. Besides, it offers a focus to prioritize specific actions. Originality/value It is important to compare the perceptions of service quality between patients and the healthcare service providers who work in direct contact with them. The managers can smooth out these differences and ensure, over time, customer satisfaction. In this study, providers were asked to express what they think about the expectations of patients and about their own service performance delivered. Thus, not only the traditional gap 5 was measured, but it was also possible to evaluate the distance between what providers think that patients need and their actual needs.
目的 本文旨在从患者和医疗服务提供者的角度,调查巴西纳塔尔市城市公共卫生诊所提供的服务中的期望和质量差距。
设计/方法/途径 研究样本包括1200名使用公共卫生服务的患者以及265名提供者,这些提供者是巴西纳塔尔市三家卫生诊所的医生、营养师、物理治疗师、心理学家、药剂师和管理人员。在数据收集过程中使用了一个包含25个卫生服务属性的量表。采用汇总统计和t检验来分析数据。
研究结果 结果表明,在所有属性方面,提供者认为用户的期望水平低于用户自己表明的水平。对于哪些属性被认为是最重要的,提供者和用户的见解最为接近:健康专业人员提供的解释、知识水平和关注度。在大多数属性方面,用户和提供者察觉到了相似的质量差距。通过学生检验比较平均质量缺陷时,考虑到5%的显著性水平,由用户和提供者各自独立表现得出的差距在统计上是相同的。
研究局限性/启示 结果仅呈现了当下的情况。该研究未考虑不同收入水平、性别或年龄组之间可能存在的差异。定性研究可以增进对不同观点的差异和一致性的理解。更深入的研究甚至可以探讨各种可能性,以便卫生管理人员能够推动服务变革,其中一些变革成本较低,比如对健康专业人员进行与患者沟通的培训。
实际意义 由机会矩阵(重要性×质量差距)补充的服务质量评估产生信息,有助于在合理分配可用资源和提高提供给患者的服务质量方面做出决策。此外,它为优先开展特定行动提供了一个重点。
原创性/价值 比较患者与直接接触他们的医疗服务提供者对服务质量的看法很重要。管理人员可以消除这些差异,并随着时间的推移确保客户满意度。在本研究中,要求提供者表达他们对患者期望以及自身提供的服务表现的看法。因此,不仅测量了传统的差距5,还能够评估提供者认为患者需要的与患者实际需求之间的距离。