Ashley Dennis W, Nicholas Jeffrey M, Dente Christopher J, Johns Tracy J, Garlow Laura E, Solomon Gina, Abston Dena, Ferdinand Colville H
Am Surg. 2017 Sep 1;83(9):966-971.
As quality and outcomes have moved to the fore front of medicine in this era of healthcare reform, a state trauma system Performance Based Payments (PBP) program has been incorporated into trauma center readiness funding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a PBP on trauma center revenue. From 2010 to 2016, a percentage of readiness costs funding to trauma centers was placed in a PBP and withheld until the PBP criteria were completed. To introduce the concept, only three performance criteria and 10 per cent of readiness costs funding were tied to PBP in 2010. The PBP has evolved over the last several years to now include specific criteria by level of designation with an increase to 50 per cent of readiness costs funding being tied to PBP criteria. Final PBP distribution to trauma centers was based on the number of performance criteria completed. During 2016, the PBP criteria for Level I and II trauma centers included participation in official state meetings/conference calls, required attendance to American College of Surgeons state chapter meetings, Trauma Quality Improvement Program, registry reports, and surgeon participation in Peer Review Committee and trauma alert response times. Over the seven-year study period, $36,261,469 was available for readiness funds with $11,534,512 eligible for the PBP. Only $636,383 (6%) was withheld from trauma centers. A performance-based program was successfully incorporated into trauma center readiness funding, supporting state performance measures without adversely affecting the trauma center revenue. Future PBP criteria may be aligned to designation standards and clinical quality performance metrics.
在这个医疗改革时代,质量和医疗成果已成为医学的前沿重点,一项基于绩效支付(PBP)的州创伤系统计划已被纳入创伤中心准备资金。本研究的目的是评估PBP对创伤中心收入的影响。从2010年到2016年,分配给创伤中心的一部分准备成本资金被纳入PBP,并被暂扣,直到达到PBP标准。为引入该概念,2010年仅有三项绩效标准以及10%的准备成本资金与PBP挂钩。在过去几年中,PBP不断发展,现在已包括按指定级别划分的具体标准,与PBP标准挂钩的准备成本资金增加到了50%。最终分配给创伤中心的PBP资金是基于完成的绩效标准数量。2016年期间,I级和II级创伤中心的PBP标准包括参加州官方会议/电话会议、必须参加美国外科医师学会州分会会议、创伤质量改进计划、登记报告,以及外科医生参与同行评审委员会和创伤警报响应时间。在七年的研究期内,有36,261,469美元可用于准备资金,其中11,534,512美元符合PBP条件。只有636,383美元(6%)被从创伤中心暂扣。一个基于绩效的计划成功地被纳入创伤中心准备资金,支持了州绩效指标,同时没有对创伤中心收入产生不利影响。未来的PBP标准可能会与指定标准和临床质量绩效指标保持一致。