Suppr超能文献

原发性肺癌机器人手术的初步结果:可行性、安全性及学习曲线

Initial Results of Robotic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer: Feasibility, Safety and Learning Curve.

作者信息

Taniguchi Yuji, Nakamura Hiroshige, Miwa Ken, Haruki Tomohiro, Araki Kunio, Takagi Yuzo, Wakahara Makoto, Yurugi Yohei, Kubouchi Yasuaki, Ohno Takashi, Kidokoro Yoshiteru, Fujiwara Wakako

机构信息

Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.

出版信息

Yonago Acta Med. 2017 Sep 15;60(3):162-166. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At the end of 2016, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) was still not covered by Japanese national health insurance. Therefore, few institutions in Japan perform RATS and even fewer have reported procedures as they occurred earlier. So, we decided to focus on the initial results of RATS for primary lung cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients who underwent RATS for primary lung cancer from January 2011 to August 2016. After mastering the initial procedure, we introduced a completely portal robotic pulmonary resection procedure using a carbon dioxide insufflation system. Cases were divided into 2 groups: the early period (20 cases) and the later period (24 cases).

RESULTS

There was no case of conversion to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or thoracotomy. In the 44 cases of primary lung cancer, median operating time was 239.5 min, console time was 179 min, blood loss was 10 mL, drainage period was 2 days, morbidity of Grade 2 or more (Clavien-Dindo classification) was 18.2%, morbidity of Grade 3 or more was only 4.6%, and there was no 30-day mortality. Median operating and console times were significantly shorter in the later period (215 min and 159.5 min, respectively) than in the initial period (300.5 min and 228 min, respectively). Median blood loss was significantly lower in the later period (5 mL) than in the initial period (50 mL). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 100% and 88.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RATS for primary lung cancer is feasible and safe, has a faster learning curve, and provides satisfactory. Studies with longer follow-ups and larger numbers of cases are necessary.

摘要

背景

2016年底,机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)仍未被纳入日本国民健康保险范围。因此,日本很少有机构开展RATS,且鲜有机构报告早期开展的手术情况。所以,我们决定关注RATS治疗原发性肺癌的初期结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2016年8月期间接受RATS治疗原发性肺癌的44例患者。在掌握了初始手术方法后,我们引入了使用二氧化碳充气系统的完全经胸壁机器人肺切除术。病例分为2组:早期(20例)和后期(24例)。

结果

无一例转为电视辅助胸腔镜手术或开胸手术。在44例原发性肺癌病例中,中位手术时间为239.5分钟,控制台操作时间为179分钟,失血量为10毫升,引流时间为2天,2级或更高等级(Clavien-Dindo分类)的并发症发生率为18.2%,3级或更高等级的并发症发生率仅为4.6%,且无30天死亡率。后期的中位手术时间和控制台操作时间(分别为215分钟和159.5分钟)明显短于初期(分别为300.5分钟和228分钟)。后期的中位失血量(5毫升)明显低于初期(50毫升)。五年总生存率和无病生存率分别为100%和88.9%。

结论

RATS治疗原发性肺癌是可行且安全的,学习曲线更快,效果令人满意。有必要进行更长时间随访和更大样本量的研究。

相似文献

1
4
[Implementation of a robotic video-assisted thoracic surgical program].
Rev Mal Respir. 2016 Mar;33(3):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
Initial results of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in Japan.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;62(12):720-5. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0441-7. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
6
Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
7
Robotic-Assisted Videothoracoscopic Surgery of the Lung.
Cancer Control. 2015 Jul;22(3):314-25. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200309.
9
Comparative intention-to-treat analysis of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approach to pulmonary segmentectomy for lung carcinoma‡.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;21(3):276-83. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv143. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Robot-assisted lobectomy versus completely portal robotic lobectomy: What is the difference?
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020 Oct 21;28(4):648-655. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.19436. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional approaches for short-term outcomes of anatomical segmentectomy.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;72(5):338-345. doi: 10.1007/s11748-023-01983-y. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
Transforming Surgical Education through a Resident Robotic Curriculum.
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jul 6;2(3):e076. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000076. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Inflammatory cytokines in robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery.
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jun;14(6):2000-2010. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1820.
5
Robotic open-thoracotomy-view approach using vertical port placement and confronting monitor setting.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):60-67. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab033.
6
Outcomes of major complications after robotic anatomic pulmonary resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):681-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.057. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Report on First International Workshop on Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Oncology.
Front Oncol. 2016 Oct 24;6:214. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.
3
Upstaging and survival after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1211-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(7):1747-52. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.14.
6
Robotic sleeve lobectomy: technical details and early results.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(Suppl 2):S223-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.70.
7
Initial results of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in Japan.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;62(12):720-5. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0441-7. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
8
Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted vs thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1505-1512. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-3032.
9
Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):203-8; discussion 208-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.051. Epub 2014 May 1.
10
Robotic lobectomy for lung cancer: evolution in technique and technology.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):626-30; discussion 630-1. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu079. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验