• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量活性炭用于肠道去污:由医学非专业人员实施——关于可行性和实用性的前瞻性研究

Single dose activated charcoal for gut decontamination: Application by medical non-professionals -a prospective study on availability and practicability.

作者信息

Pfab Rudolf, Schmoll Sabrina, Dostal Gabriele, Stenzel Jochen, Hapfelmeier Alexander, Eyer Florian

机构信息

Division of Clinical Toxicology, Department of Internal Medicine 2, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.

Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Toxicol Rep. 2016 Dec 31;4:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.12.007. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.12.007
PMID:28959624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5615092/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Oral activated charcoal (AC) for toxin absorption should be applied as soon as possible. Extra-hospital AC-application on site by medical laypersons with pre-emptive obtained AC may save time, but may be inferior to AC-application by medical professionals.

OBJECTIVE

  1. Availability and incidence of pre-emptive stockpiling of AC on site in the German region Bavaria 2) time saved by AC-stockpiling and application on site, 3) quality of AC-application defined by completeness of the applied AC-dose, time needed, incidence of side-effects in lay-care and in professional-care, considering confounding variables: AC-formulation/powder/tablets, recommended AC-dose, patient's age.

METHOD

telephone-interviews in cases with AC-recommendation by a Poison Information Centre (PIC). Lay-care was suggested according to risk-assessment by PIC. Ingestion sites were classified as either apt for AC-stockpiling or not apt.

RESULTS

  1. availability: In Bavaria only 20%-22% of eligible cases had AC on-hand, 2) time-saving was at least 14 min. 3) Lay-care/professional-care or patient's age had no significant influence on the completeness of the applied AC-dose, which was higher with AC as powder but negatively correlated with the recommended AC-dose. No significant difference was seen with time needed for application and incidence of side-effects.

CONCLUSION

pre-emptive AC-stocking should be encouraged.

摘要

背景

用于毒素吸收的口服活性炭(AC)应尽快使用。由非专业医疗人员在现场使用预先获取的AC进行院外AC应用可能节省时间,但可能不如专业医疗人员进行的AC应用。

目的

1)德国巴伐利亚地区现场预先储备AC的可用性和发生率;2)AC储备和现场应用节省的时间;3)根据应用AC剂量的完整性、所需时间、非专业护理和专业护理中副作用的发生率来定义AC应用的质量,同时考虑混杂变量:AC制剂/粉末/片剂、推荐的AC剂量、患者年龄。

方法

对毒物信息中心(PIC)推荐使用AC的病例进行电话访谈。根据PIC的风险评估建议进行非专业护理。摄入地点分为适合AC储备或不适合。

结果

1)可用性:在巴伐利亚,只有20%-22%的符合条件的病例手头有AC;2)节省时间至少14分钟;3)非专业护理/专业护理或患者年龄对应用AC剂量的完整性没有显著影响,粉末状AC的应用剂量完整性更高,但与推荐的AC剂量呈负相关。在应用所需时间和副作用发生率方面没有显著差异。

结论

应鼓励预先储备AC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/5615092/0c0142ca43f9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/5615092/0c0142ca43f9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/5615092/0c0142ca43f9/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Single dose activated charcoal for gut decontamination: Application by medical non-professionals -a prospective study on availability and practicability.单剂量活性炭用于肠道去污:由医学非专业人员实施——关于可行性和实用性的前瞻性研究
Toxicol Rep. 2016 Dec 31;4:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.12.007. eCollection 2017.
2
The availability of activated charcoal and ipecac for home use.家用活性炭和吐根糖浆的可获得性。
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1999 Aug;41(4):247-8.
3
Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home.在家中使用活性炭的评估。
Pediatrics. 2001 Dec;108(6):E100. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.6.e100.
4
Acetaminophen poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.对乙酰氨基酚中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/15563650500394571.
5
Tricyclic antidepressant poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.三环类抗抑郁药中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(3):203-33. doi: 10.1080/15563650701226192.
6
Activated charcoal as the sole intervention for treatment after childhood poisoning.活性炭作为儿童中毒后治疗的唯一干预措施。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2000 Apr;12(2):166-71. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200004000-00015.
7
Differences in treatment advice for common poisons by poisons centres--an international comparison.毒物中心对常见毒物治疗建议的差异——一项国际比较。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(3):234-9. doi: 10.1080/15563650601031601.
8
Methylphenidate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.哌甲酯中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Oct-Nov;45(7):737-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665175.
9
Diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.苯海拉明和茶苯海明中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(3):205-23. doi: 10.1080/15563650600585920.
10
An exploratory study; the therapeutic effects of premixed activated charcoal-sorbitol administration in patients poisoned with organophosphate pesticide.一项探索性研究;预混活性炭-山梨醇给药对有机磷农药中毒患者的治疗效果
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Feb;53(2):119-26. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.1001516. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Availability of essential medicines in Pakistan-A comprehensive document analysis.巴基斯坦基本药物的供应情况——全面的文件分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253880. eCollection 2021.
2
Correlation of osmolal gap with measured concentrations of acetone, ethylene glycol, isopropanol, methanol, and propylene glycol in patients at an academic medical center.某学术医学中心患者的渗透压间隙与丙酮、乙二醇、异丙醇、甲醇和丙二醇测量浓度的相关性。
Toxicol Rep. 2019 Dec 23;7:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.12.005. eCollection 2020.
3
The Use of Activated Charcoal to Treat Intoxications.

本文引用的文献

1
Activated charcoal for acute overdose: a reappraisal.活性炭用于急性药物过量:重新评估
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;81(3):482-7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12793. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
2
2013 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS): 31st Annual Report.2013 年美国毒物控制中心协会国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)年度报告:第 31 年度报告。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Dec;52(10):1032-283. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.987397.
3
The association between U.S. Poison Center assistance and length of stay and hospital charges.
活性炭在中毒治疗中的应用。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 3;116(18):311-317. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0311.
4
Diet-Related Metabolic Perturbations of Gut Microbial Shikimate Pathway-Tryptamine-tRNA Aminoacylation-Protein Synthesis in Human Health and Disease.饮食相关的肠道微生物莽草酸途径-色胺-tRNA氨酰化-蛋白质合成在人类健康和疾病中的代谢扰动
Int J Tryptophan Res. 2019 Mar 28;12:1178646919834550. doi: 10.1177/1178646919834550. eCollection 2019.
美国毒物中心援助与住院时间和住院费用的关联。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Mar;52(3):198-206. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.892125.
4
Economic evaluation of poison centers: a systematic review.毒理中心的经济评估:系统综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):86-92. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000116.
5
Indications for single-dose activated charcoal administration in acute overdose.急性药物过量中单剂量活性炭给药的适应证。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Aug;17(4):351-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328348bf59.
6
The effect of activated charcoal on drug exposure in healthy volunteers: a meta-analysis.活性炭对健康志愿者药物暴露的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 May;85(5):501-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.278. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
7
Poison control centers decrease emergency healthcare utilization costs.中毒控制中心可降低紧急医疗保健的使用成本。
J Med Toxicol. 2008 Dec;4(4):221-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03161204.
8
Multiple-dose activated charcoal in acute self-poisoning: a randomised controlled trial.多剂量活性炭用于急性自我中毒:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):579-87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60270-6.
9
One pill can kill: assessing the potential for fatal poisonings in children.一粒药丸就能致命:评估儿童致命中毒的可能性。
Pediatr Ann. 2005 Dec;34(12):964-8. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-20051201-12.
10
Prehospital activated charcoal: the way forward.院前使用活性炭:前进的方向。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Oct;22(10):734-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.024968.