文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

众包方法在癌症研究中的应用:一项系统综述。

The application of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: a systematic review.

作者信息

Lee Young Ji, Arida Janet A, Donovan Heidi S

机构信息

Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2017 Nov;6(11):2595-2605. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1165. Epub 2017 Sep 29.


DOI:10.1002/cam4.1165
PMID:28960834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5673951/
Abstract

Crowdsourcing is "the practice of obtaining participants, services, ideas, or content by soliciting contributions from a large group of people, especially via the Internet." (Ranard et al. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29:187, 2014) Although crowdsourcing has been adopted in healthcare research and its potential for analyzing large datasets and obtaining rapid feedback has recently been recognized, no systematic reviews of crowdsourcing in cancer research have been conducted. Therefore, we sought to identify applications of and explore potential uses for crowdsourcing in cancer research. We conducted a systematic review of articles published between January 2005 and June 2016 on crowdsourcing in cancer research, using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO, and Embase. Data from the 12 identified articles were summarized but not combined statistically. The studies addressed a range of cancers (e.g., breast, skin, gynecologic, colorectal, prostate). Eleven studies collected data on the Internet using web-based platforms; one recruited participants in a shopping mall using paper-and-pen data collection. Four studies used Amazon Mechanical Turk for recruiting and/or data collection. Study objectives comprised categorizing biopsy images (n = 6), assessing cancer knowledge (n = 3), refining a decision support system (n = 1), standardizing survivorship care-planning (n = 1), and designing a clinical trial (n = 1). Although one study demonstrated that "the wisdom of the crowd" (NCI Budget Fact Book, 2017) could not replace trained experts, five studies suggest that distributed human intelligence could approximate or support the work of trained experts. Despite limitations, crowdsourcing has the potential to improve the quality and speed of research while reducing costs. Longitudinal studies should confirm and refine these findings.

摘要

众包是“通过向一大群人征求贡献来获取参与者、服务、想法或内容的做法,尤其是通过互联网”。(拉纳德等人,《普通内科医学杂志》29:187,2014年)尽管众包已被应用于医疗保健研究,且其分析大型数据集和快速获得反馈的潜力最近已得到认可,但尚未对癌症研究中的众包进行系统评价。因此,我们试图确定众包在癌症研究中的应用并探索其潜在用途。我们使用PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、PsychINFO和Embase对2005年1月至2016年6月发表的关于癌症研究中众包的文章进行了系统评价。对12篇已识别文章的数据进行了总结,但未进行统计合并。这些研究涉及多种癌症(如乳腺癌、皮肤癌、妇科癌症、结直肠癌、前列腺癌)。11项研究使用基于网络的平台在互联网上收集数据;1项研究在购物中心使用纸笔数据收集方式招募参与者。4项研究使用亚马逊土耳其机器人进行招募和/或数据收集。研究目标包括对活检图像进行分类(n = 6)、评估癌症知识(n = 3)、完善决策支持系统(n = 1)、规范生存护理计划(n = 1)以及设计一项临床试验(n = 1)。尽管有一项研究表明“群体智慧”(《美国国家癌症研究所预算手册》,2017年)无法取代训练有素的专家,但有5项研究表明,分布式人类智能可以接近或支持训练有素的专家的工作。尽管存在局限性,但众包有潜力提高研究质量和速度,同时降低成本。纵向研究应证实并完善这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85bd/5673951/20936fe12288/CAM4-6-2595-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85bd/5673951/20936fe12288/CAM4-6-2595-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85bd/5673951/20936fe12288/CAM4-6-2595-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The application of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: a systematic review.

Cancer Med. 2017-11

[2]
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Health Technol Assess. 2006-9

[4]
Selenium for preventing cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-29

[5]
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8

[6]
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2024-10

[7]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[8]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[9]
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16

[10]
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-9-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
"Lost in translation?" Animal research in the era of precision medicine.

J Transl Med. 2025-2-4

[2]
A Perspective on Crowdsourcing and Human-in-the-Loop Workflows in Precision Health.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-4-11

[3]
Developing Crowdsourced Clinical Registry Studies.

Am J Nurs. 2024-4-1

[4]
Task design for crowdsourced glioma cell annotation in microscopy images.

Sci Rep. 2024-1-23

[5]
The Future of Precision Oncology.

Int J Mol Sci. 2023-8-9

[6]
Assessing Interventions on Crowdsourcing Platforms to Nudge Patients for Engagement Behaviors in Primary Care Settings: Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-7-13

[7]
FDA Oncology Center of Excellence Crowdsourcing Initiative: Outreach to the Scientific Community to Identify Research Questions for Pooled Analyses of Oncology Clinical Trial Data.

Clin Cancer Res. 2023-8-15

[8]
Social innovations to increase health coverage: evidence from a crowdsourcing contest in Ghana.

BMJ Open. 2022-6-7

[9]
Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.

PLoS One. 2022

[10]
Patients', pharmacists', and prescribers' attitude toward using blockchain and machine learning in a proposed ePrescription system: online survey.

JAMIA Open. 2022-1-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and their caregivers. A randomized controlled trial study and lessons learned.

Trials. 2015-9-25

[2]
Crowdsourcing the General Public for Large Scale Molecular Pathology Studies in Cancer.

EBioMedicine. 2015-5-9

[3]
Sun Protection Belief Clusters: Analysis of Amazon Mechanical Turk Data.

J Cancer Educ. 2016-12

[4]
Crowdsourcing for conducting randomized trials of internet delivered interventions in people with serious mental illness: A systematic review.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2015-9

[5]
Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection.

Nat Methods. 2015-7

[6]
It takes a (virtual) village: crowdsourcing measurement consensus to advance survivorship care planning.

Transl Behav Med. 2015-3

[7]
The cure: design and evaluation of a crowdsourcing game for gene selection for breast cancer survival prediction.

JMIR Serious Games. 2014-7-29

[8]
Cancer statistics, 2015.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2015-1-5

[9]
Use of crowdsourcing for cancer clinical trial development.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-9-12

[10]
Crowdsourcing awareness: exploration of the ovarian cancer knowledge gap through Amazon Mechanical Turk.

PLoS One. 2014-1-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索