• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用公民科学让受卵巢癌影响的家庭参与制定基因服务拓展策略。

Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0262575
PMID:35157722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8843236/
Abstract

Citizen science (CS) approaches involving non-professional researchers (citizens) as research collaborators has been used infrequently in health promotion generally and specifically, in cancer prevention. Standardized CS approaches may be especially useful for developing communication interventions to encourage families to consider cancer genetic services. We engaged survivors of ovarian cancer and their close relatives as CS collaborators to collect and help interpret data to inform content for a website, printed invitation materials, and short-message reminders. We applied an implementation quality framework, and posed four research questions regarding the feasibility of CS: recruitment, data collection, data quality and evaluation of the experience. CS members were recruited through three networks: clinical sites, local and national cancer support organizations, and online ovarian cancer patient support groups. The professional research team operationalized theory-aligned CS tasks, five data collection options, question banks/scripts for creating surveys, structured interviews, online training and ongoing support from research coaches. 14 CS members agreed to the 12-week and 20-hour commitment for an honorarium. CS members opted to do both qualitative and quantitative assessments. CS members collected 261 surveys and 39 structured interviews. The largest number of surveys were collected for Task 1 (n = 102) to assess survivors' reactions to different possible options for motivating survivors to visit a study website; 77% of this data were complete (i.e., no missing values). Data collected for tasks 2, 3, 4, and 5 (e.g., assessment of survivors' and relatives' respective communication preferences) ranged from 10 to 58 surveys (80% to 84% completeness). All data were collected within the specified time frame. CSs reported 17 hours of work on average and regarded the experience positively. Our experience suggests that CS engagement is feasible, can yield comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data, and is achievable in a relatively a short timeline.

摘要

公民科学(CS)方法涉及非专业研究人员(公民)作为研究合作者,在健康促进中通常很少使用,特别是在癌症预防方面。标准化的 CS 方法可能特别有助于开发沟通干预措施,以鼓励家庭考虑癌症遗传服务。我们聘请了卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲作为 CS 合作者,收集和帮助解释数据,为网站、印刷邀请材料和短信提醒提供信息。我们应用了实施质量框架,并提出了四个关于 CS 可行性的研究问题:招募、数据收集、数据质量和经验评估。CS 成员通过三个网络招募:临床站点、当地和国家癌症支持组织以及在线卵巢癌患者支持小组。专业研究团队实施了与理论一致的 CS 任务、五种数据收集选项、创建调查的问题库/脚本、结构化访谈、在线培训和研究教练的持续支持。14 名 CS 成员同意在 12 周内完成 20 小时的任务,以获得酬金。CS 成员选择进行定性和定量评估。CS 成员收集了 261 份调查和 39 份结构化访谈。最多的调查是为任务 1(n=102)收集的,用于评估幸存者对不同可能选择的反应,以激励幸存者访问研究网站;其中 77%的数据是完整的(即没有缺失值)。任务 2、3、4 和 5 收集的数据(例如,评估幸存者和亲属各自的沟通偏好)从 10 到 58 份调查不等(80%至 84%的完整性)。所有数据都在规定的时间内收集。CS 报告平均工作 17 小时,并对经验给予积极评价。我们的经验表明,CS 参与是可行的,可以产生全面的定量和定性数据,并且可以在相对较短的时间内实现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b109/8843236/a57178b25069/pone.0262575.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b109/8843236/a57178b25069/pone.0262575.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b109/8843236/a57178b25069/pone.0262575.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.运用公民科学让受卵巢癌影响的家庭参与制定基因服务拓展策略。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.
2
Your Family Connects: A Theory-Based Intervention to Encourage Communication about Possible Inherited Cancer Risk among Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Close Relatives.家庭纽带相连:一项基于理论的干预措施,旨在鼓励卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲之间就可能的遗传性癌症风险进行沟通。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):77-89. doi: 10.1159/000531772. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
Citizen science to improve patient and public involvement in GUideline Implementation in oral health and DEntistry (the GUIDE platform).促进患者和公众参与口腔健康和牙科指南实施的公民科学(GUIDE 平台)。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13921. doi: 10.1111/hex.13921. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?为什么拉丁美洲科学家对公民科学作为传粉媒介监测和保护工具的看法很重要?
Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
7
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.一项关于衡量和评估公民参与健康研究的方法的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 10;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00405-2.
10
How IoT-Driven Citizen Science Coupled with Data Satisficing Can Promote Deep Citizen Science.物联网驱动的公民科学与数据满足相结合如何促进深度公民科学。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;22(9):3196. doi: 10.3390/s22093196.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.未访问为家庭提供免费遗传咨询服务的研究网站的癌症幸存者的信任和隐私担忧:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e64228. doi: 10.2196/64228.
2
Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.

本文引用的文献

1
What guidance does HIPAA offer to providers considering familial risk notification and cascade genetic testing?对于考虑进行家族风险通知和级联基因检测的医疗服务提供者,《健康保险流通与责任法案》提供了哪些指导?
J Law Biosci. 2020 Dec 11;7(1):lsaa071. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa071. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.探索患者和公众参与健康、社会关怀和患者安全的理论、障碍和促进因素:系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3.
3
Citizen science and marine conservation: a global review.
公民科学与海洋保护:全球综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 21;375(1814):20190461. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0461. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Citizen science in ecology: a place for humans in nature.生态学中的公民科学:人类在自然中的一席之地。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Jun;1469(1):52-64. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14340. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Promoting cardiovascular health and wellness among African-Americans: Community participatory approach to design an innovative mobile-health intervention.促进非裔美国人的心血管健康与健康:设计创新型移动健康干预措施的社区参与式方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0218724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218724. eCollection 2019.
6
The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.公民科学在健康和生物医学研究中的兴起。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859.
7
Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review.公众参与全球基因组学研究:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;7:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.
8
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
9
Community involvement in design, implementation and evaluation of nutrition interventions to reduce chronic diseases in indigenous populations in the U.S.: a systematic review.社区参与设计、实施和评估营养干预措施,以减少美国土著人群中的慢性疾病:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Aug 13;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0829-6.
10
The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌和林奇综合征的症状前基因检测应用:文献系统综述及对临床实践的启示
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z.