Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.
Citizen science (CS) approaches involving non-professional researchers (citizens) as research collaborators has been used infrequently in health promotion generally and specifically, in cancer prevention. Standardized CS approaches may be especially useful for developing communication interventions to encourage families to consider cancer genetic services. We engaged survivors of ovarian cancer and their close relatives as CS collaborators to collect and help interpret data to inform content for a website, printed invitation materials, and short-message reminders. We applied an implementation quality framework, and posed four research questions regarding the feasibility of CS: recruitment, data collection, data quality and evaluation of the experience. CS members were recruited through three networks: clinical sites, local and national cancer support organizations, and online ovarian cancer patient support groups. The professional research team operationalized theory-aligned CS tasks, five data collection options, question banks/scripts for creating surveys, structured interviews, online training and ongoing support from research coaches. 14 CS members agreed to the 12-week and 20-hour commitment for an honorarium. CS members opted to do both qualitative and quantitative assessments. CS members collected 261 surveys and 39 structured interviews. The largest number of surveys were collected for Task 1 (n = 102) to assess survivors' reactions to different possible options for motivating survivors to visit a study website; 77% of this data were complete (i.e., no missing values). Data collected for tasks 2, 3, 4, and 5 (e.g., assessment of survivors' and relatives' respective communication preferences) ranged from 10 to 58 surveys (80% to 84% completeness). All data were collected within the specified time frame. CSs reported 17 hours of work on average and regarded the experience positively. Our experience suggests that CS engagement is feasible, can yield comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data, and is achievable in a relatively a short timeline.
公民科学(CS)方法涉及非专业研究人员(公民)作为研究合作者,在健康促进中通常很少使用,特别是在癌症预防方面。标准化的 CS 方法可能特别有助于开发沟通干预措施,以鼓励家庭考虑癌症遗传服务。我们聘请了卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲作为 CS 合作者,收集和帮助解释数据,为网站、印刷邀请材料和短信提醒提供信息。我们应用了实施质量框架,并提出了四个关于 CS 可行性的研究问题:招募、数据收集、数据质量和经验评估。CS 成员通过三个网络招募:临床站点、当地和国家癌症支持组织以及在线卵巢癌患者支持小组。专业研究团队实施了与理论一致的 CS 任务、五种数据收集选项、创建调查的问题库/脚本、结构化访谈、在线培训和研究教练的持续支持。14 名 CS 成员同意在 12 周内完成 20 小时的任务,以获得酬金。CS 成员选择进行定性和定量评估。CS 成员收集了 261 份调查和 39 份结构化访谈。最多的调查是为任务 1(n=102)收集的,用于评估幸存者对不同可能选择的反应,以激励幸存者访问研究网站;其中 77%的数据是完整的(即没有缺失值)。任务 2、3、4 和 5 收集的数据(例如,评估幸存者和亲属各自的沟通偏好)从 10 到 58 份调查不等(80%至 84%的完整性)。所有数据都在规定的时间内收集。CS 报告平均工作 17 小时,并对经验给予积极评价。我们的经验表明,CS 参与是可行的,可以产生全面的定量和定性数据,并且可以在相对较短的时间内实现。