Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (Captain Thomas and Dr Mac Kenzie) and Division of Health Informatics and Surveillance (Dr Yoon), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Communicable Disease Division, Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan (Mr Collins); and Public Health Informatics, Epidemiology, and Preparedness, Denver Public Health, Denver, Colorado (Dr Davidson).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 May/Jun;24(3):235-240. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000679.
Evaluating public health surveillance systems is critical to ensuring that conditions of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Our objectives were to qualitatively evaluate 6 state and local health departments that were early adopters of syndromic surveillance in order to (1) understand the characteristics and current uses, (2) identify the most and least useful syndromes to monitor, (3) gauge the utility for early warning and outbreak detection, and (4) assess how syndromic surveillance impacted their daily decision making.
We adapted evaluation guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and gathered input from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention subject matter experts in public health surveillance to develop a questionnaire.
We interviewed staff members from a convenience sample of 6 local and state health departments with syndromic surveillance programs that had been in operation for more than 10 years.
Three of the 6 interviewees provided an example of using syndromic surveillance to identify an outbreak (ie, cluster of foodborne illness in 1 jurisdiction) or detect a surge in cases for seasonal conditions (eg, influenza in 2 jurisdictions) prior to traditional, disease-specific systems. Although all interviewees noted that syndromic surveillance has not been routinely useful or efficient for early outbreak detection or case finding in their jurisdictions, all agreed that the information can be used to improve their understanding of dynamic disease control environments and conditions (eg, situational awareness) in their communities.
In the jurisdictions studied, syndromic surveillance may be useful for monitoring the spread and intensity of large outbreaks of disease, especially influenza; enhancing public health awareness of mass gatherings and natural disasters; and assessing new, otherwise unmonitored conditions when real-time alternatives are unavailable. Future studies should explore opportunities to strengthen syndromic surveillance by including broader access to and enhanced analysis of text-related data from electronic health records. Health departments may accelerate the development and use of syndromic surveillance systems, including the improvement of the predictive value and strengthening the early outbreak detection capability of these systems. These efforts support getting the right information to the right people at the right time, which is the overarching goal of CDC's Surveillance Strategy.
评估公共卫生监测系统对于确保对重要公共卫生状况进行适当监测至关重要。我们的目标是定性评估 6 个州和地方卫生部门,这些部门是症状监测的早期采用者,以便:(1)了解其特征和当前用途;(2)确定最有用和最无用的监测综合征;(3)评估其用于早期预警和暴发检测的效用;以及(4)评估症状监测如何影响他们的日常决策。
我们改编了疾病预防控制中心的评估指南,并从疾病预防控制中心的公共卫生监测主题专家那里收集意见,制定了一份调查问卷。
我们采访了来自 6 个州和地方卫生部门的工作人员,这些部门拥有已运行超过 10 年的症状监测计划。这些部门是随机抽样的。
在 6 位接受采访者中,有 3 位提供了一个利用症状监测识别暴发(例如,1 个司法管辖区的食源性疾病集群)或检测季节性疾病病例激增(例如,2 个司法管辖区的流感)的例子。虽然所有接受采访者都指出,在其司法管辖区内,症状监测对于早期暴发检测或病例发现通常不实用或效率低下,但他们都同意该信息可用于改善他们对动态疾病控制环境和条件(例如,态势感知)的理解。
在所研究的司法管辖区内,症状监测可能有助于监测疾病的大规模暴发(尤其是流感)的传播和强度;增强公众对大型集会和自然灾害的健康意识;以及在实时替代方案不可用时,评估新的、 otherwise unmonitored 情况。未来的研究应探索通过包括更广泛地获取和增强对电子健康记录中与文本相关数据的分析来加强症状监测的机会。卫生部门可以通过改进这些系统的预测值和加强早期暴发检测能力,加快症状监测系统的开发和使用。这些努力支持在正确的时间将正确的信息提供给正确的人,这是疾病预防控制中心监测策略的总体目标。