Song Pei, Dong Tieli, Zhang Jun, Li Jianfeng, Lu Wenliang
Department of Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Sep;14(3):2206-2210. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4762. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
This study investigated the effects of different anesthesia and analgesia methods on immune function and serum tumor marker levels of critically ill patients undergoing tumor resection surgery. Seventy-six critically ill patients with indications for tumor resection surgery were selected in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2015 to August 2016. The patients were randomly divided into a control and an observation group (38 patients each). The patients in the control group were treated with general anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia, while the patients in the observation group were treated with general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia. Venous blood samples were collected at 30 min before anesthesia (T1), 2 h after the beginning of the surgery (T2), immediately after surgery (T3), 24 h after surgery (T4) and 72 h after surgery (T5). The viable cell percentage of T lymphocyte subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8) and natural killer (NK) cells were measured by flow cytometry. The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, sugar chain antigen 199, sugar chain antigen 125, neuron specific enolase and cytokeratin 19 were detected by electrochemiluminescence at 24 h before and after operation. Our results showed the levels of CD3, CD4 and CD4/CD8 in the control group at T3-T5 were significantly lower than those at T1 (p<0.05). The CD3 level in observation group at T3 was also significantly lower than the level at T1 (p<0.05), but it increased at T4 and T5 and showed no significant difference compared with the initial level (p>0.05). The levels of CD4 and CD4/CD8 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at T2-T5 (p<0.05). And, the levels of CD3 and CD4 were significantly higher than those in the control group at T4 (p<0.05). The level of CD4/CD8 was significantly higher than that in the control group at T5 (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the levels of CD8 and NK cells between the 2 groups at any of the time-points (p>0.05). No significant differences were found either in any of the tested tumor markers in either group after 24 h. Even without differences on the tumor marker levels, these results suggest that general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia and analgesia produces milder deleterious effects on the immune function of perioperative critically ill patients than general anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia.
本研究探讨了不同麻醉和镇痛方法对接受肿瘤切除手术的重症患者免疫功能及血清肿瘤标志物水平的影响。2015年9月至2016年8月,在郑州大学第二附属医院选取76例有肿瘤切除手术指征的重症患者。将患者随机分为对照组和观察组(每组38例)。对照组患者采用全身麻醉及术后静脉镇痛,观察组患者采用全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉及术后硬膜外镇痛。于麻醉前30分钟(T1)、手术开始后2小时(T2)、手术结束即刻(T3)、术后24小时(T4)及术后72小时(T5)采集静脉血样本。采用流式细胞术检测T淋巴细胞亚群(CD3、CD4、CD8、CD4/CD8)及自然杀伤(NK)细胞的活细胞百分比。采用电化学发光法检测手术前后24小时癌胚抗原、糖链抗原199、糖链抗原125、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及细胞角蛋白19的水平。结果显示,对照组T3 - T5时CD3、CD4及CD4/CD8水平显著低于T1时(p<0.05)。观察组T3时CD3水平也显著低于T1时(p<0.05),但在T4和T5时升高,与初始水平相比无显著差异(p>0.05)。观察组T2 - T5时CD4及CD4/CD8水平显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。并且,观察组T4时CD3和CD4水平显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。观察组T5时CD4/CD8水平显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。两组在任何时间点的CD8及NK细胞水平均无显著差异(p>0.05)。术后24小时两组的任何检测肿瘤标志物水平均无显著差异。即使肿瘤标志物水平无差异,这些结果表明,与全身麻醉联合静脉镇痛相比,全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉及镇痛对围手术期重症患者免疫功能的有害影响更轻。