• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危孕妇群体产前护理相关文献的系统综述

A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women.

机构信息

Department of OB/GYN, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N. University Blvd, UH 2440, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2
PMID:28962601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5622470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Group prenatal care (GPC) models have been gaining popularity in recent years. Studies of high-risk groups have shown improved outcomes. Our objective was to review and summarize outcomes for women in GPC for women with specific high-risk conditions.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of Ovid, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies reporting the effects of group prenatal care in high-risk populations. Studies were included if they reported on pregnancy outcome results for women using GPC. We also contacted providers known to be utilizing GPC for specific high-risk women. Descriptive results were compiled and summarized by high-risk population.

RESULTS

We identified 37 reports for inclusion (8 randomized trials, 23 nonrandomized studies, 6 reports of group outcomes without controls). Preterm birth was found to be decreased among low-income and African American women. Attendance at prenatal visits was shown to increase among women in GPC in the following groups: Opioid Addiction, Adolescents, and Low-Income. Improved weight trajectories and compliance with the IOM's weight recommendations were found in adolescents. Increased rates of breastfeeding were found in adolescents and African Americans. Increased satisfaction with care was found in adolescents and African Americans. Pregnancy knowledge was increased among adolescents, as was uptake of LARC. Improved psychological outcomes were found among adolescents and low-income women. Studies in women with diabetes demonstrated that fewer women required treatment with medication when exposed to GPC, and for those requiring treatment with insulin, GPC individuals required less than half the dose. Among women with tobacco use, those who had continued to smoke after finding out they were pregnant were 5 times more likely to quit later in pregnancy if they were engaged in GPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Several groups of high-risk pregnant women may have benefits from engaging in group prenatal care. Because there is a paucity of high-quality, well-controlled studies, more trials in high-risk women are needed to determine whether it improves outcomes and costs of pregnancy-related care.

摘要

背景

近年来,群体产前护理(GPC)模式越来越受欢迎。对高危人群的研究表明,该模式改善了结局。我们的目的是回顾和总结具有特定高危条件的妇女参加 GPC 的结局。

方法

对 Ovid、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 进行系统文献检索,以确定报告群体产前护理对高危人群妊娠结局影响的研究。如果研究报告了使用 GPC 的妇女的妊娠结局结果,则纳入研究。我们还联系了已知为特定高危妇女使用 GPC 的提供者。按高危人群汇总和总结描述性结果。

结果

我们确定了 37 份报告纳入(8 项随机试验、23 项非随机研究、6 份没有对照组的群体结局报告)。低收入和非裔美国妇女的早产率降低。GPC 中的以下人群产前检查的出席率增加:阿片类药物成瘾、青少年和低收入人群。青少年的体重轨迹和遵守 IOM 体重建议的情况得到改善。青少年和非裔美国人的母乳喂养率增加。青少年和非裔美国人对护理的满意度增加。青少年的妊娠知识增加,LARC 的采用增加。青少年和低收入妇女的心理结局得到改善。患有糖尿病的妇女的研究表明,与接受 GPC 相比,接受药物治疗的妇女减少,需要胰岛素治疗的妇女,GPC 个体所需的剂量不到一半。在吸烟的妇女中,如果她们在发现怀孕后继续吸烟,那么如果她们参加 GPC,她们在怀孕后期戒烟的可能性是不参加 GPC 的 5 倍。

结论

有几种高危孕妇群体可能从参加群体产前护理中获益。由于高质量、对照良好的研究较少,需要在高危妇女中进行更多的试验,以确定它是否改善妊娠相关护理的结局和成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2092/5622470/c169cfdc9a81/12884_2017_1522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2092/5622470/c169cfdc9a81/12884_2017_1522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2092/5622470/c169cfdc9a81/12884_2017_1522_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women.高危孕妇群体产前护理相关文献的系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2.
2
Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy.孕期女性的多种微量营养素补充
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD004905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004905.pub5.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy.孕激素产前给药预防多胎妊娠妇女自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD012024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3.
7
Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy.孕激素产前给药预防多胎妊娠妇女自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 31;10(10):CD012024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women.盆底肌训练用于预防和治疗产前及产后女性的尿失禁和粪失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD007471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Prenatal Interventions for Teenage Pregnant: A Systematic Review.针对青少年孕妇的社会心理产前干预:一项系统综述
J Family Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;19(2):69-84. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19295.
2
Pregnancy follow-ups in Family Medicine: A retrospective study.家庭医学中的孕期随访:一项回顾性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2066-2072. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.8099.
3
A Quasi-Experimental Study: Social Support in Group Prenatal Care's Impact on Postpartum Depression in Black and Hispanic Women.一项准实验研究:群体产前护理中的社会支持对黑人和西班牙裔女性产后抑郁的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Group Prenatal Care With Gestational Weight Gain.小组产前护理与孕期体重增加的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):663-670. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001940.
2
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
3
Engagement with and outcomes of a Midwifery-led intervention group for pregnant women of high body mass index.针对高体重指数孕妇的助产士主导干预组的参与情况及结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 30;22(7):1046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071046.
4
Study protocol of group antenatal care implementation at a public women's hospital in Brazil.巴西一家公立妇产医院实施的群体产前护理研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326084. eCollection 2025.
5
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.群体产前护理积极改变护理体验:马拉维一项有效性试验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.
6
Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial.提高招募的多样性:REACH孕期交流圈试点试验中的经验教训
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70300. doi: 10.1111/hex.70300.
7
The Effects of CenteringPregnancy: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation.“以孕妇为中心”项目的效果:一项准实验评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 3;13(9):1052. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091052.
8
Interventions to reduce inequalities for pregnant women living with disadvantage in high-income countries: an umbrella review.减少高收入国家处境不利的孕妇不平等现象的干预措施:一项综合性综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22283-5.
9
Strategies for Overcoming Barriers in Access to Cardiovascular Care for Women.克服女性获得心血管护理障碍的策略。
Circ Res. 2025 Mar 14;136(6):628-641. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.325544. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
10
Belonging: a meta-theme analysis of women's community-making in group antenatal and postnatal care.归属感:对女性在产前和产后小组护理中建立社区的元主题分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;13:1506956. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506956. eCollection 2025.
Obstet Med. 2016 Sep;9(3):120-5. doi: 10.1177/1753495X16638560. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
4
Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.群组产前护理与传统产前护理的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):551-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
5
Gestational Weight Gain and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Group Prenatal Care.群组产前护理中的孕期体重增加与母乳喂养结果
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):557-562. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12484. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Improved Outcomes for Hispanic Women with Gestational Diabetes Using the Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care Model.采用孕期集中式小组产前护理模式改善西班牙裔妊娠期糖尿病女性的结局。
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Feb;21(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2114-x.
7
Glycemic control, compliance, and satisfaction for diabetic gravidas in centering group care.集中式小组护理中糖尿病孕妇的血糖控制、依从性和满意度。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 May;30(10):1221-1226. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1209650. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Group Prenatal Care Results in Medicaid Savings with Better Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis of CenteringPregnancy Participation in South Carolina.群组产前护理可节省医疗补助并带来更好的结果:南卡罗来纳州孕期中心参与情况的倾向得分分析
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jul;20(7):1384-93. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1935-y.
9
Qualitative Comparison of Women's Perspectives on the Functions and Benefits of Group and Individual Prenatal Care.女性对团体和个体产前护理的功能及益处看法的定性比较
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):224-34. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12379. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
Births: Final Data for 2014.出生情况:2014年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.