Suppr超能文献

简化芬尼根新生儿戒断评分系统:美国两家机构的回顾性研究

Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA.

作者信息

Gomez Pomar Enrique, Finnegan Loretta P, Devlin Lori, Bada Henrietta, Concina Vanessa A, Ibonia Katrina T, Westgate Philip M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Kentucky, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.

College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016176.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being assessed with the FNAS.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to two level IV neonatal intensive care units with a total of 40 294 observations. Inclusion criteria included neonates with gestational age ≥37 0/7 weeks, who are being assessed for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) using the FNAS. Infants with a gestational age <37 weeks were excluded.

METHODS

A linear regression model based on the original FNAS data from one institution was developed to determine optimal values for each item in the sFNAS. A backward elimination approach was used, removing the items that contributed least to the Pearson's correlation. The sFNAS was then cross-validated with data from a second institution.

RESULTS

Pearson's correlation between the proposed sFNAS and the FNAS was 0.914. The optimal treatment cut-off values for the sFNAS were 6 and 10 to predict FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of these cut-off values to detect FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12 were 0.888 and 0.883 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.637 and 0.992 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. The sFNAS cross-validation resulted in a Pearson's correlation of 0.908, sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.873 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.525 and 0.986 for a cut-off of 10, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The sFNAS has a high statistical correlation with the FNAS, and it is cross-validated for the assessment of infants with NAS. It has excellent specificity and negative predictive value for identifying infants with FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12.

摘要

目的

开发一种简化的芬尼根新生儿戒断评分系统(sFNAS),该系统与使用芬尼根新生儿戒断评分系统(FNAS)评估的婴儿中得分≥8分和≥12分高度相关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性分析,涉及367名入住两家四级新生儿重症监护病房的患者,共进行了40294次观察。纳入标准包括孕周≥37 0/7周、使用FNAS评估新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)的新生儿。孕周<37周的婴儿被排除。

方法

基于一个机构的原始FNAS数据建立线性回归模型,以确定sFNAS中每个项目的最佳值。采用向后消除法,去除对皮尔逊相关性贡献最小的项目。然后用第二个机构的数据对sFNAS进行交叉验证。

结果

所提出的sFNAS与FNAS之间的皮尔逊相关性为0.914。sFNAS预测FNAS得分≥8分和≥12分的最佳治疗临界值分别为6分和10分。这些临界值检测FNAS得分≥8分和≥12分的敏感性和特异性,临界值为6分时分别为0.888和0.883,临界值为10分时分别为0.637和0.992。sFNAS交叉验证的皮尔逊相关性为0.908,临界值为6分时敏感性和特异性分别为0.860和0.873,临界值为10分时分别为0.525和0.986。

结论

sFNAS与FNAS具有高度的统计学相关性,并且已通过交叉验证用于评估NAS婴儿。在识别FNAS得分≥8分和≥12分的婴儿方面,它具有出色的特异性和阴性预测价值。

相似文献

9
A New Scoring System for the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征评估的新评分系统。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Feb;37(3):333-340. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400310. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

6
A review of the genomics of neonatal abstinence syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征的基因组学综述。
Front Genet. 2023 Feb 10;14:1140400. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1140400. eCollection 2023.
10
Integrated Review of the Assessment of Newborns With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征新生儿评估的综合评估。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 Sep;50(5):539-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

5
The Triple Aim for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征的三重目标。
J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1189-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.047. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验