• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在5%七氟醚复合芬太尼麻醉下行腺样体扁桃体切除术时罗库溴铵的最佳剂量。

Optimal dose of rocuronium bromide undergoing adenotonsillectomy under 5% sevoflurane with fentanyl.

作者信息

Huh Hyub, Park Jeong Jun, Kim Ji Yeong, Kim Tae Hoon, Yoon Seung Zhoo, Shin Hye Won, Lee Hye-Won, Lim Hye-Ja, Cho Jang Eun

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anam Hospital Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;101:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.030
PMID:28964314
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adenotonsillectomy is a short surgical procedure under general anaesthesia in children. An ideal muscle relaxant for adenotonsillectomy would create an intense neuromuscular block while having a quick recovery time without postoperative morbidity. We compared the effect of different doses of rocuronium for the tracheal intubation in children under 5% sevoflurane and fentanyl.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

75 children (aged 3-10 years, ASA I) scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were enrolled. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg/kg, followed by fentanyl 2 μg/kg. After mask ventilation with 5 vol% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen for 2 min, 2 ml of study drug was administered intravenously, i.e., either normal saline (S Group) or one of two doses (0.15 or 0.3 mg/kg) of rocuronium. We assessed conditions during tracheal intubation and also recorded the surgical condition, the time from discontinuation of sevoflurane to extubation and PAED scale, pain scores in PACU.

RESULTS

Rocuronium groups (96% and 100%, respectively; P < 0.01) showed statistically superior clinically acceptable intubating conditions than the saline group (72%). The 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium (80%) treatment clearly resulted in excellent intubating conditions compared with the 0.15 mg/kg group (44%; p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the time to extubation and surgical condition, and in the postoperative measures of emergence delirium, pain, and recovery time among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

A dose of 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium may provide optimal intubating conditions without delayed recovery in 5% sevoflurane anaesthesia with fentanyl in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER

NCT02467595.

摘要

目的

腺样体扁桃体切除术是儿童在全身麻醉下进行的一种简短外科手术。用于腺样体扁桃体切除术的理想肌肉松弛剂应能产生强烈的神经肌肉阻滞作用,同时恢复时间短且无术后并发症。我们比较了不同剂量罗库溴铵在5%七氟醚和芬太尼麻醉下对5岁以下儿童气管插管的效果。

材料与方法

纳入75例计划行腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童(年龄3 - 10岁,ASA I级)。采用2.5 mg/kg丙泊酚诱导麻醉,随后给予2 μg/kg芬太尼。在100%氧气中用5%七氟醚面罩通气2分钟后,静脉注射2 ml研究药物,即生理盐水(S组)或两种剂量(0.15或0.3 mg/kg)的罗库溴铵之一。我们评估了气管插管时的情况,并记录了手术情况、从停用七氟醚到拔管的时间以及小儿麻醉苏醒期谵妄评分(PAED量表)、麻醉后恢复室(PACU)的疼痛评分。

结果

罗库溴铵组(分别为96%和100%;P < 0.01)在临床上可接受的插管条件方面在统计学上优于生理盐水组(72%)。与0.15 mg/kg组(44%;p = 0.028)相比,0.3 mg/kg罗库溴铵治疗组(80%)明显产生了优良的插管条件。三组在拔管时间、手术情况以及术后苏醒期谵妄、疼痛和恢复时间的指标方面均无显著差异。

结论

对于接受腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童,在5%七氟醚和芬太尼麻醉中,0.3 mg/kg的罗库溴铵剂量可能提供最佳的插管条件且不会延迟恢复。

临床试验注册号

NCT02467595。

相似文献

1
Optimal dose of rocuronium bromide undergoing adenotonsillectomy under 5% sevoflurane with fentanyl.在5%七氟醚复合芬太尼麻醉下行腺样体扁桃体切除术时罗库溴铵的最佳剂量。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;101:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
Intubating conditions and side effects of propofol, remifentanil and sevoflurane compared with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium: a randomised, prospective, clinical trial.丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和七氟醚与丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和罗库溴铵相比的插管条件及副作用:一项随机、前瞻性临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 May 22;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-39. eCollection 2014.
3
The neuromuscular effects of rocuronium under sevoflurane-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized clinical comparative study in an Asian population.七氟醚-瑞芬太尼或丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉下罗库溴铵的神经肌肉效应:一项针对亚洲人群的随机临床对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0231-0.
4
Evaluation of intubating conditions in children after sevoflurane induction using propofol or rocuronium bromide--a randomised, prospective, double blind study.使用丙泊酚或罗库溴铵对七氟醚诱导后的儿童进行插管条件评估——一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2015;66(4):25-30.
5
Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia.七氟醚和丙泊酚联合罗库溴铵用于改良快速顺序诱导麻醉的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1999 Mar;54(3):247-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00745.x.
6
[Tracheal intubation quality under remifentanil-propofol with sevoflurane compared with remifentanil-propofol with rocuronium: a randomized double-blind clinical trial].瑞芬太尼 - 丙泊酚复合七氟醚与瑞芬太尼 - 丙泊酚复合罗库溴铵用于气管插管的质量比较:一项随机双盲临床试验
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Jun-Jul;57(6):351-6. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70247-4.
7
Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.罗库溴铵在地氟烷、异氟烷和七氟烷麻醉期间的神经肌肉阻滞作用。
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):526-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03012702.
8
Rocuronium duration of action under sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol anaesthesia.七氟烷、地氟烷或丙泊酚麻醉下罗库溴铵的作用持续时间。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;21(10):781-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000055.
9
Optimal rocuronium dose for intubation during inhalation induction with sevoflurane in children.七氟醚吸入诱导下儿童气管插管时罗库溴铵的最佳剂量
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Aug;89(2):277-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef177.
10
Intubating conditions and onset of action after rocuronium, vecuronium, and atracurium in young children.小儿使用罗库溴铵、维库溴铵和阿曲库铵后的插管条件及起效时间。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):320-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety of high-dose rocuronium bromide in general anesthesia for spinal surgery and its effects on muscle relaxation.大剂量罗库溴铵在脊柱手术全身麻醉中的安全性及其对肌肉松弛的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):8110-8117. eCollection 2021.