Suppr超能文献

英国分层国家乳腺癌筛查计划评估:基于早期模型的成本效益分析

Evaluation of a Stratified National Breast Screening Program in the United Kingdom: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

作者信息

Gray Ewan, Donten Anna, Karssemeijer Nico, van Gils Carla, Evans D Gareth, Astley Sue, Payne Katherine

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1100-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the incremental costs and consequences of stratified national breast screening programs (stratified NBSPs) and drivers of relative cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model (discrete event simulation) was conceptualized to represent four stratified NBSPs (risk 1, risk 2, masking [supplemental screening for women with higher breast density], and masking and risk 1) compared with the current UK NBSP and no screening. The model assumed a lifetime horizon, the health service perspective to identify costs (£, 2015), and measured consequences in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Multiple data sources were used: systematic reviews of effectiveness and utility, published studies reporting costs, and cohort studies embedded in existing NBSPs. Model parameter uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis and one-way sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis, supported by probabilistic sensitivity analysis, suggested that the risk stratified NBSPs (risk 1 and risk-2) were relatively cost-effective when compared with the current UK NBSP, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £16,689 per QALY and £23,924 per QALY, respectively. Stratified NBSP including masking approaches (supplemental screening for women with higher breast density) was not a cost-effective alternative, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £212,947 per QALY (masking) and £75,254 per QALY (risk 1 and masking). When compared with no screening, all stratified NBSPs could be considered cost-effective. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were discount rate, natural history model parameters, mammographic sensitivity, and biopsy rates for recalled cases. A key assumption was that the risk model used in the stratification process was perfectly calibrated to the population.

CONCLUSIONS

This early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis provides indicative evidence for decision makers to understand the key drivers of costs and QALYs for exemplar stratified NBSP.

摘要

目标

确定分层国家乳腺癌筛查项目(stratified NBSPs)的增量成本和后果以及相对成本效益的驱动因素。

方法

构建一个决策分析模型(离散事件模拟),以代表四种分层NBSPs(风险1、风险2、掩蔽[对乳腺密度较高的女性进行补充筛查]以及掩蔽和风险1),并与英国当前的NBSP和不进行筛查进行比较。该模型假设为终身视角,从卫生服务角度确定成本(英镑,2015年),并以质量调整生命年(QALYs)衡量后果。使用了多个数据源:有效性和效用的系统评价、报告成本的已发表研究以及现有NBSPs中嵌入的队列研究。使用概率敏感性分析和单因素敏感性分析评估模型参数的不确定性。

结果

在概率敏感性分析支持下的基础案例分析表明,与英国当前的NBSP相比,风险分层的NBSPs(风险1和风险2)具有相对成本效益,增量成本效益比分别为每QALY 16,689英镑和每QALY 23,924英镑。包括掩蔽方法(对乳腺密度较高的女性进行补充筛查)的分层NBSP不是一种具有成本效益的替代方案,增量成本效益比为每QALY 212,947英镑(掩蔽)和每QALY 75,254英镑(风险1和掩蔽)。与不进行筛查相比,所有分层NBSPs都可被视为具有成本效益。成本效益的关键驱动因素是贴现率、自然史模型参数、乳腺X线摄影敏感性以及召回病例的活检率。一个关键假设是分层过程中使用的风险模型与人群完全校准。

结论

这种基于模型的早期成本效益分析为决策者理解示例分层NBSP的成本和QALYs的关键驱动因素提供了指示性证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验