Melo Diogo, Porto Arthur, Cheverud James M, Marroig Gabriel
Laboratório de Evolução de Mamíferos, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Department of Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, 63130, US.
Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2016;47:463-486. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032409. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
Modularity has emerged as a central concept for evolutionary biology, providing the field with a theory of organismal structure and variation. This theory has reframed long standing questions and serves as a unified conceptual framework for genetics, developmental biology and multivariate evolution. Research programs in systems biology and quantitative genetics are bridging the gap between these fields. While this synthesis is ongoing, some major themes have emerged and empirical evidence for modularity has become abundant. In this review, we look at modularity from an historical perspective, highlighting its meaning at different levels of biological organization and the different methods that can be used to detect it. We then explore the relationship between quantitative genetic approaches to modularity and developmental genetic studies. We conclude by investigating the dynamic relationship between modularity and the adaptive landscape and how this potentially shapes evolution and can help bridge the gap between micro- and macroevolution.
模块化已成为进化生物学的核心概念,为该领域提供了一种关于生物体结构和变异的理论。这一理论重新诠释了长期存在的问题,并为遗传学、发育生物学和多变量进化提供了一个统一的概念框架。系统生物学和数量遗传学的研究项目正在弥合这些领域之间的差距。虽然这种整合仍在进行中,但一些主要主题已经出现,支持模块化的经验证据也变得丰富起来。在这篇综述中,我们从历史的角度审视模块化,强调其在生物组织不同层面的意义以及可用于检测它的不同方法。然后,我们探讨数量遗传学方法与发育遗传学研究之间的关系。我们通过研究模块化与适应景观之间的动态关系以及这如何潜在地塑造进化并有助于弥合微观进化和宏观进化之间的差距来得出结论。