Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析:后二尖瓣叶脱垂中腱索置换与瓣叶切除的比较。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;155(1):120-128.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.078. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection techniques for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies that compared chordal replacement ("neo-chord" group) versus leaflet resection ("resection" group) techniques for the treatment of posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Data were extracted by 2 independent investigators and subjected to a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1 propensity-matched study, and 6 unadjusted observational studies, with a total of 1926 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Two studies reported only perioperative outcomes; mean follow-up ranged from 1.0 to 5.9 years in the remaining studies. In pooled data from unadjusted observational studies, annuloplasty ring diameter was higher in the neo-chord group (+1.5 mm; P = .0003), but with high heterogeneity (I = 91%). Based on limited data, postprocedural left ventricular ejection fraction may be greater in the neo-chord group, but this difference reached statistical significance only in the RCT (+3.4%; P = .03), and not in 2 observational studies that reported this outcome (+2.7%; P = .10). There was no difference in recurrent mitral regurgitation at follow-up between the resection and neo-chord groups; however, patients in the neo-chord group had a lower rate of mitral valve reoperation at follow-up in the unadjusted observational studies (incidence rate ratio, 0.22; P = .0008 [I = 0%; 4 studies, 1331 patients]).

CONCLUSIONS

Chordal replacement may be associated with greater freedom from reoperation and may lead to improved postoperative left ventricular function compared with leaflet resection. However, these conclusions are supported primarily by data from unadjusted observational studies, and high-quality RCTs of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection are needed.

摘要

目的

比较修复孤立性二尖瓣后叶脱垂时使用腱索置换术与瓣叶切除术的疗效。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库中检索了比较腱索置换术(“neo-chord”组)与瓣叶切除术(“resection”组)治疗二尖瓣后叶脱垂的研究。由两名独立研究者提取数据,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共有 1 项随机对照试验(RCT)、1 项倾向评分匹配研究和 6 项未校正的观察性研究纳入了 1926 例患者,符合我们的纳入标准。有 2 项研究仅报告了围手术期结果;其余研究的中位随访时间为 1.0-5.9 年。在未校正的观察性研究的汇总数据中,neo-chord 组的瓣环直径更大(+1.5mm;P=0.0003),但存在高度异质性(I²=91%)。基于有限的数据,neo-chord 组术后左心室射血分数可能更高,但这一差异仅在 RCT 中具有统计学意义(+3.4%;P=0.03),而在报告这一结果的 2 项观察性研究中则无统计学意义(+2.7%;P=0.10)。两组患者在随访时的复发性二尖瓣反流发生率无差异;然而,在未校正的观察性研究中,neo-chord 组患者的二尖瓣再手术率较低(发生率比,0.22;P=0.0008[I=0%;4 项研究,1331 例患者])。

结论

与瓣叶切除术相比,腱索置换术可能与更高的免于再次手术率相关,并可能导致术后左心室功能改善。然而,这些结论主要基于未校正的观察性研究数据,需要高质量的腱索置换术与瓣叶切除术的 RCT 来进一步证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验