• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立性后瓣叶脱垂的二尖瓣修复术实现长期耐久性的最佳方法是什么?

What Is the Optimal Mitral Valve Repair for Isolated Posterior Leaflet Prolapse to Achieve Long-Term Durability?

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center Osaka Suita Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Aoba-ku Sendai Japan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 6;12(11):e028607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028607. Epub 2023 May 26.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.028607
PMID:37232245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382008/
Abstract

Background This study assessed risk factors for mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence or functional mitral stenosis during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Methods and Results We assessed a consecutive series of 511 patients who underwent primary mitral valve repair for isolated posterior leaflet prolapse between 2001 and 2021. Annuloplasty using a partial band was selected in 86.3%. The leaflet resection technique was used in 83.0%, whereas the chordal replacement without resection was used in 14.5%. Risk factors were analyzed for MR recurrence ≥grade 2 or functional mitral stenosis with mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg using a multivariable Fine-Gray regression model. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidence of MR ≥grade 2 was 7.8%, 22.7%, and 30.1%, respectively, whereas that of mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg was 8.1%, 20.6%, and 29.3%, respectively. Risk factors for MR ≥grade 2 included chordal replacement without resection (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50, <0.001) and larger prosthesis size (HR, 1.13, =0.023), whereas factors for functional mitral stenosis were use of a full ring (partial band versus full ring, HR, 0.53, =0.013), smaller prosthesis size (HR, 0.74, <0.001), and larger body surface area (HR, 3.03, =0.045). Both MR ≥grade 2 and mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg at 1 year post surgery were significantly associated with the long-term incidence of reoperation. Conclusions Leaflet resection with a large partial band may be an optimal strategy for isolated posterior mitral valve prolapse.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了在因孤立性后瓣叶脱垂而接受二尖瓣修复术的患者中,长期随访时二尖瓣反流(MR)复发或功能性二尖瓣狭窄的危险因素。

方法和结果

我们评估了 2001 年至 2021 年间连续 511 例因孤立性后瓣叶脱垂而行初次二尖瓣修复术的患者。86.3%的患者采用部分环缩带瓣环成形术。83.0%的患者采用瓣叶切除术,14.5%的患者采用无瓣叶切除的腱索置换术。使用多变量 Fine-Gray 回归模型分析 MR 复发≥2 级或平均跨瓣压力梯度≥5mmHg的危险因素。MR≥2 级的 1、5 和 10 年累积发生率分别为 7.8%、22.7%和 30.1%,平均跨瓣压力梯度≥5mmHg 的分别为 8.1%、20.6%和 29.3%。MR≥2 级的危险因素包括无瓣叶切除的腱索置换术(危险比[HR],2.50,<0.001)和更大的假体尺寸(HR,1.13,=0.023),而功能性二尖瓣狭窄的危险因素包括使用全环(部分环与全环,HR,0.53,=0.013)、更小的假体尺寸(HR,0.74,<0.001)和更大的体表面积(HR,3.03,=0.045)。术后 1 年时,MR≥2 级和平均跨瓣压力梯度≥5mmHg 与长期再手术的发生率显著相关。

结论

对于孤立性后瓣叶脱垂,采用大的部分环缩带瓣叶切除术可能是一种最佳策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/f8738314561b/JAH3-12-e028607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/c5ad0f3004d5/JAH3-12-e028607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/cf0cb72c146c/JAH3-12-e028607-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/fe64c02a373c/JAH3-12-e028607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/b2fd00f84680/JAH3-12-e028607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/f8738314561b/JAH3-12-e028607-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/c5ad0f3004d5/JAH3-12-e028607-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/cf0cb72c146c/JAH3-12-e028607-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/fe64c02a373c/JAH3-12-e028607-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/b2fd00f84680/JAH3-12-e028607-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117e/10382008/f8738314561b/JAH3-12-e028607-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
What Is the Optimal Mitral Valve Repair for Isolated Posterior Leaflet Prolapse to Achieve Long-Term Durability?孤立性后瓣叶脱垂的二尖瓣修复术实现长期耐久性的最佳方法是什么?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 6;12(11):e028607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028607. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection for isolated posterior mitral valve prolapse.孤立性二尖瓣后叶脱垂的腱索置换术与瓣叶切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):779-786. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09634-3. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Left ventricular performance early after repair for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: Chordal replacement versus leaflet resection.二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复术后早期左心室功能:腱索置换与瓣叶切除。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
Long-term outcomes of artificial chordal replacement with tourniquet technique in mitral valve repair: a single-center experience of 700 cases.二尖瓣修复术中使用止血带技术进行人工腱索置换的长期结果:700例单中心经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):2033-2038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
Chordal Reconstruction versus Leaflet Resection for Repair of Degenerative Posterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse.用于退行性二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复的腱索重建与瓣叶切除术对比
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22(2):90-7. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.15-00322. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
6
Intermediate-term results of a nonresectional dynamic repair technique in 662 patients with mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation.662 例二尖瓣脱垂伴二尖瓣反流患者非切除性动力修复技术的中期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.044. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
7
Long-term outcomes of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse.采用膨体聚四氟乙烯缝线行腱索置换修复二尖瓣瓣叶脱垂的长期疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):385-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era.当代二尖瓣脱垂亚组修复的生存优势及耐久性改善
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.091.
9
Repair of Anterior Mitral Leaflet Prolapse: Comparison of Mid-Term Outcomes with Chordal Transposition and Chordal Replacement Techniques.二尖瓣前叶脱垂修复术:腱索转位术与腱索置换术中期疗效比较
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Mar;25(2):187-194.
10
Should annuloplasty prosthesis be selected dependent on the location of prolapse in mitral valve repair for type II dysfunction?在二尖瓣修复治疗 II 型功能障碍时,是否应根据脱垂部位选择成形环假体?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;154(6):1915-1924.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.049. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Posterior leaflet reconstruction in mitral valve repair: Does resect versus respect strategy matter?二尖瓣修复术中后叶重建:切除与保留策略重要吗?
JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 23;26:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.009. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Biomechanical modeling of surgical techniques to repair isolated segmental P2 prolapse of the mitral valve.二尖瓣孤立节段性P2脱垂修复手术技术的生物力学建模
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 20;25:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.011. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Deep learning-based post hoc denoising for 3D volume-rendered cardiac CT in mitral valve prolapse.

本文引用的文献

1
Leaflet Resection vs Preservation for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Functional Outcomes and Mitral Stenosis at 12 Months in a Randomized Trial.**标题**:退行性二尖瓣反流行二尖瓣叶切开术与二尖瓣成形术对比:一项随机试验的 12 个月时功能结局和二尖瓣狭窄 **原文**:Leaflet Resection vs Preservation for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Functional Outcomes and Mitral Stenosis at 12 Months in a Randomized Trial.
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Jun;38(6):808-814. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Implantability of the MITRIS RESILIA Mitral Valve.MITRIS RESILIA 二尖瓣的可植入性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):e295-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.065. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
基于深度学习的二尖瓣脱垂三维容积再现心脏CT的事后去噪
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03403-z.
4
High-fidelity 3D cardiac CT for mitral valve prolapse.用于二尖瓣脱垂的高保真三维心脏CT
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03230-8.
Lessons from reoperations for mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair.
二尖瓣修复术后二尖瓣狭窄再次手术的教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.022. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Benefits of robotically-assisted surgery for complex mitral valve repair.机器人辅助手术在复杂二尖瓣修复中的优势。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):417-425. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa271.
6
Early failure after non-resectional mitral valve repair with artificial chordae.非切除性二尖瓣修复术后人工腱索早期失败。
J Card Surg. 2020 Sep;35(9):2432-2435. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14817. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
7
Impact of type and size of annuloplasty prosthesis on hemodynamic status after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.瓣环成形假体的类型和尺寸对退行性疾病二尖瓣修复术后血流动力学状态的影响。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Apr 24;28:100517. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100517. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve repair in a single institution: report of the first 100 cases.单中心机器人辅助二尖瓣修复术的早期结果:100 例的初步报告。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68(10):1079-1085. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01317-2. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
9
The impact of intraoperative residual mild regurgitation after repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation.修复退行性二尖瓣反流后术中残留轻度反流的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;161(4):1215-1224.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.033. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Long-term outcomes of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse.采用膨体聚四氟乙烯缝线行腱索置换修复二尖瓣瓣叶脱垂的长期疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):385-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.