• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腱索植入与瓣叶切除治疗二尖瓣后叶脱垂伴左心室扩张:长期随访的倾向性评分匹配比较。

Neochordae implantation versus leaflet resection in mitral valve posterior leaflet prolapse and dilated left ventricle: a propensity score matching comparison with long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

University Centre of Statistics in Biomedical Sciences (CUSSB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad274.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezad274
PMID:37551944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10693437/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Uncorrected severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to posterior prolapse leads to left ventricular dilatation. At this stage, mitral valve repair becomes mandatory to avoid permanent myocardial injury. However, which technique among neochoardae implantation and leaflet resection provides the best results in this scenario remains unknown.

METHODS

We selected 332 patients with left ventricular dilatation and severe degenerative MR due to posterior leaflet (PL) prolapse who underwent neochoardae implantation (85 patients) or PL resection (247 patients) at our institution between 2008 and 2020. A propensity score matching analysis was carried on to decrease the differences at baseline.

RESULTS

Matching yielded 85 neochordae implantations and 85 PL resections. At 10 years, freedom from cardiac death and freedom from mitral valve reoperation were 92.6 ± 6.1% vs 97.8 ± 2.1% and 97.7 ± 2.2% vs 95 ± 3% in the neochordae group and in the PL resection group, respectively. The MR ≥2+ recurrence rate was 23.9 ± 10% in the neochordae group and 20.8 ± 5.8% in the PL resection group (P = 0.834) at 10 years. At the last follow-up, the neochordae group showed a higher reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (44 vs 48 mm; P = 0.001) and a better ejection fraction (60% vs 55%; P < 0.001) compared to PL resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this subgroup of patients, both neochordae implantation and leaflet resection provide excellent durability of the repair in the long term. Neochordae implantation might have a better effect on dilated left ventricle.

摘要

目的

由于后瓣脱垂导致的未矫正的重度二尖瓣反流(MR)会引起左心室扩张。在这个阶段,为了避免永久性心肌损伤,二尖瓣修复是必需的。然而,在这种情况下,哪种技术(neochoardae 植入术和瓣叶切除术)提供最佳结果仍然未知。

方法

我们选择了 2008 年至 2020 年间在我院接受 neochoardae 植入术(85 例)或 PL 切除术(247 例)的 332 例因后叶(PL)脱垂导致左心室扩张和严重退行性 MR 的患者。进行倾向评分匹配分析以减少基线差异。

结果

匹配得到 85 例 neochoardae 植入术和 85 例 PL 切除术。在 10 年时,neochoardae 组和 PL 切除术组的无心脏死亡和无二尖瓣再手术生存率分别为 92.6±6.1% vs 97.8±2.1%和 97.7±2.2% vs 95±3%。neochoardae 组的 MR≥2+复发率为 23.9±10%,PL 切除术组为 20.8±5.8%(P=0.834)。在最后一次随访时,neochoardae 组的左心室舒张末期直径(44 与 48mm;P=0.001)和射血分数(60%与 55%;P<0.001)的降低幅度均大于 PL 切除术组。

结论

在这个亚组患者中,neochoardae 植入术和瓣叶切除术在长期内均能提供出色的修复耐久性。neochoardae 植入术可能对扩张的左心室有更好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/ebd45dd719fc/ezad274f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/c350b08a1d10/ezad274f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/8b34c7be7fbb/ezad274f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/ea4ca842b4b6/ezad274f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/f2cf2cefd714/ezad274f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/ebd45dd719fc/ezad274f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/c350b08a1d10/ezad274f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/8b34c7be7fbb/ezad274f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/ea4ca842b4b6/ezad274f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/f2cf2cefd714/ezad274f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3e/10693437/ebd45dd719fc/ezad274f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Neochordae implantation versus leaflet resection in mitral valve posterior leaflet prolapse and dilated left ventricle: a propensity score matching comparison with long-term follow-up.腱索植入与瓣叶切除治疗二尖瓣后叶脱垂伴左心室扩张:长期随访的倾向性评分匹配比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad274.
2
Polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae is noninferior to leaflet resection in repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: a multicentre study.聚四氟乙烯人工腱索在单纯二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复中不劣于瓣叶切除术:一项多中心研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;19(4):577-83. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu225. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
3
Artificial chordae in the setting of complex mitral valve repair: early outcomes using the folding leaflet technique.复杂二尖瓣修复术中人工腱索:采用折叠瓣叶技术的早期结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):586-95. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu013. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
Left ventricular performance early after repair for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: Chordal replacement versus leaflet resection.二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复术后早期左心室功能:腱索置换与瓣叶切除。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
5
Ideal site for ventricular anchoring of artificial chordae in mitral regurgitation.二尖瓣反流人工腱索心室锚定点的理想部位。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.031. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
Large Animal Translational Validation of 3 Mitral Valve Repair Operations for Mitral Regurgitation Using a Mitral Valve Prolapse Model: A Comprehensive In Vivo Biomechanical Engineering Analysis.使用二尖瓣脱垂模型对二尖瓣反流的 3 种二尖瓣修复手术进行大动物转化验证:综合体内生物力学工程分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr;17(4):e013196. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013196. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Good 5-Year Durability of Transapical Beating Heart Off-Pump Mitral Valve Repair With Neochordae.经心尖跳动心脏不停跳二尖瓣修复术应用腱索新技术的 5 年耐久性良好。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):440-445. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.092. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
Transapical beating heart mitral valve repair versus conventional surgery: a propensity-matched study.经心尖跳动心脏二尖瓣修复与传统手术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac053.
9
Long-term proof of efficiency for respect versus resect techniques in mitral valve repair?二尖瓣修复术中保留与切除技术长期有效性的证据?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad339.
10
Long-term outcomes of artificial chordal replacement with tourniquet technique in mitral valve repair: a single-center experience of 700 cases.二尖瓣修复术中使用止血带技术进行人工腱索置换的长期结果:700例单中心经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):2033-2038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.045. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical modeling of surgical techniques to repair isolated segmental P2 prolapse of the mitral valve.二尖瓣孤立节段性P2脱垂修复手术技术的生物力学建模
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 20;25:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.011. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Long-term results of edge-to-edge and neochordal mitral repair for isolated anterior leaflet lesion: a propensity match analysis.孤立性前叶病变的缘对缘和新腱索二尖瓣修复的长期结果:倾向匹配分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 28;66(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae435.

本文引用的文献

1
Mitral repair with leaflet preservation versus leaflet resection and ventricular reverse remodeling from a randomized trial.保留瓣叶的二尖瓣修复与瓣叶切除和心室反向重构的随机试验比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):74-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.08.081. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
Mitral valve repair for isolated posterior mitral valve leaflet prolapse: The effect of respect and resect techniques on left ventricular function.孤立性二尖瓣后叶瓣叶脱垂的二尖瓣修复术:保留和切除技术对左心室功能的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1488-1497.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Long-Term Results of Mitral Repair With Complete Semi-Rigid Rings vs Posterior Flexible Bands.
完全半刚性环与后柔性带二尖瓣修复的长期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):756-761. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Loop neochord versus leaflet resection techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair: long-term results.用于微创二尖瓣修复的环新腱索与瓣叶切除技术:长期结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 4;59(1):180-186. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa255.
5
Mitral valve regurgitation: a disease with a wide spectrum of therapeutic options.二尖瓣反流:一种具有广泛治疗选择的疾病。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Dec;17(12):807-827. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0395-7. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Long-term outcomes of chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to repair mitral leaflet prolapse.采用膨体聚四氟乙烯缝线行腱索置换修复二尖瓣瓣叶脱垂的长期疗效。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;160(2):385-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of chordal replacement versus leaflet resection for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse.系统评价和荟萃分析:后二尖瓣叶脱垂中腱索置换与瓣叶切除的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;155(1):120-128.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.078. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Mitral valve disease--current management and future challenges.二尖瓣疾病——当前的治疗方法和未来的挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00558-4.
9
Left ventricular performance early after repair for posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: Chordal replacement versus leaflet resection.二尖瓣后叶脱垂修复术后早期左心室功能:腱索置换与瓣叶切除。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.成人经超声心动图进行心腔定量的建议:美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像学会的更新版
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014.