Suppr超能文献

阅读无空格文本时的中央凹旁预览效应。

Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.

作者信息

Drieghe Denis, Fitzsimmons Gemma, Liversedge Simon P

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Southampton.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Oct;43(10):1701-1716. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000441.

Abstract

In English reading, eye guidance relies heavily on the spaces between words for demarcating word boundaries. In an eye tracking experiment, we examined the impact of removing spaces on parafoveal processing. Using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975), a high or low frequency preboundary word was followed by a postboundary preview presented either normally (i.e., identical to the postboundary word), or with letters replaced creating an orthographically illegal preview. The spaces between words were either retained or removed. Results replicate previous findings of increased reading times during unspaced reading (Rayner, Fischer, & Pollatsek, 1998) and indicate rather limited evidence for more distributed processing: Observations of processing of the previous word (spill-over effects) or processing of the next word (parafoveal-on-foveal effects) influencing fixation durations on the currently fixated word were limited. Spill-over effects were only observed in the unspaced layout when the postboundary preview was correct, presumably because the orthographically illegal, incorrect preview was visually salient enough to allow for relatively easy word segmentation and therefore more focused processing of the preboundary word. As such, results points toward a system that prefers narrowly focused processing of a single word, at least when means for easy word segmentation are available. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在英文阅读中,眼睛的引导在很大程度上依赖于单词之间的空格来划分单词边界。在一项眼动追踪实验中,我们研究了去除空格对副中央凹加工的影响。使用注视点相关边界范式(雷纳,1975年),一个高频或低频的边界前单词后面跟着一个边界后预览,该预览要么正常呈现(即与边界后单词相同),要么字母被替换,从而创建一个拼写非法的预览。单词之间的空格要么保留,要么去除。结果重复了之前关于无空格阅读时阅读时间增加的研究结果(雷纳、菲舍尔和波拉特塞克,1998年),并表明支持更分散加工的证据相当有限:观察到前一个单词的加工(溢出效应)或下一个单词的加工(副中央凹对中央凹效应)对当前注视单词的注视持续时间产生影响的情况很有限。只有当边界后预览正确时,才在无空格布局中观察到溢出效应,大概是因为拼写非法、不正确的预览在视觉上足够突出,从而允许相对容易的单词分割,因此对边界前单词的加工更集中。因此,结果表明存在一个系统,该系统至少在有容易进行单词分割的手段时,更倾向于对单个单词进行狭义集中加工。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验