• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么去除词间空格会导致阅读障碍?副中央凹加工的作用。

Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

作者信息

Sheridan Heather, Reichle Erik D, Reingold Eyal M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Social Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1543-1552. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0997-y.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0997-y
PMID:26801166
Abstract

To examine the role of inter-word spaces during reading, we used a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to manipulate parafoveal preview (i.e., valid vs. invalid preview) in a normal text condition that contained spaces (e.g., "John decided to sell the table") and in an unsegmented text condition that contained random numbers instead of spaces (e.g.,"John4decided8to5sell9the7table"). Preview effects on mean first-fixation durations were larger for normal than unsegmented text conditions, and survival analyses revealed a delay in the onset of both preview validity and word-frequency effects on first-fixation durations for unsegmented relative to normal text. Taken together with simulations that were conducted using the E-Z Reader model, the present findings indicated that unsegmented text deficits reflect disruptions to both parafoveal processing and lexical processing. We discuss the implications of our results for models of eye-movement control.

摘要

为了研究阅读过程中单词间距的作用,我们使用了注视点连续边界范式,在包含空格的正常文本条件下(例如,“John decided to sell the table”)和包含随机数字而非空格的无分割文本条件下(例如,“John4decided8to5sell9the7table”)操纵副中央凹预视(即有效预视与无效预视)。正常文本条件下,预视对首次注视平均持续时间的影响大于无分割文本条件,生存分析表明,相对于正常文本,无分割文本在预视有效性和词频对首次注视持续时间的影响出现上存在延迟。结合使用E-Z Reader模型进行的模拟,目前的研究结果表明,无分割文本缺陷反映了副中央凹加工和词汇加工的中断。我们讨论了研究结果对眼动控制模型的意义。

相似文献

1
Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.为什么去除词间空格会导致阅读障碍?副中央凹加工的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1543-1552. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0997-y.
2
Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.阅读无空格文本时的中央凹旁预览效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Oct;43(10):1701-1716. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000441.
3
Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.在阅读过程中,对单词 n + 1 的旁视加工中,区分预览有效性和预览难度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):653-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034997. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.视副区预视与自然阅读中的词汇频率:来自眼动和与注视相关的电位的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Mar;148(3):453-474. doi: 10.1037/xge0000494. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.句子阅读中的中央凹旁预视效应:合理性与正字法相关性的独立作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):519-528. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8.
6
Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.使用边界范式的改进变体进行阅读时稳定的预览难度效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1632-1645. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819990. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
7
Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.周边视野预视优势受熟练读者词汇表征精度的调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):219-32. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000017. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Parafoveal processing in reading.阅读中的副中央凹加工
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2.
9
A co-registration investigation of inter-word spacing and parafoveal preview: Eye movements and fixation-related potentials.词间间距和视副预视的共配准研究:眼动和与注视相关的电位。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0225819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225819. eCollection 2019.
10
The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.预视有效性在阅读中眼动的可预测性和频率效应方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):110-127. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000561. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.精神分裂症患者在多行阅读过程中的较低级别眼球运动缺陷:来自返回扫视的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1533-1543. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220752. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
2
Manipulating Interword and Interletter Spacing in Cursive Script: An Eye Movements Investigation of Reading Persian.连笔书写中单词间和字母间间距的操控:一项关于波斯语阅读的眼动研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 May 31;14(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.1.6.
3
A co-registration investigation of inter-word spacing and parafoveal preview: Eye movements and fixation-related potentials.

本文引用的文献

1
An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.阅读过程中词汇加工的时间进程分析
Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;40(3):522-53. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12246. Epub 2015 May 4.
2
Estimating the divergence point: a novel distributional analysis procedure for determining the onset of the influence of experimental variables.估计分歧点:一种用于确定实验变量影响开始的新分布分析程序。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 8;5:1432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01432. eCollection 2014.
3
Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.
词间间距和视副预视的共配准研究:眼动和与注视相关的电位。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0225819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225819. eCollection 2019.
4
Reading without spaces: The role of precise letter order.无空格阅读:精确字母顺序的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):846-860. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01648-6.
5
Sentence Reading Comprehension by Means of Training in Segment-Unit Reading for Japanese Children with Intellectual Disabilities.通过分段单元阅读训练提高日本智障儿童的句子阅读理解能力。
Behav Anal Pract. 2017 May 30;11(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s40617-017-0196-6. eCollection 2018 Mar.
直接词汇控制在阅读中的眼球运动:来自注视持续时间生存分析的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Sep;65(2):177-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
4
Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link.使用 E-Z 阅读器模拟非阅读任务中的眼球运动:理解眼脑链接的统一框架。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):155-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026473.
5
Eye movements while reading and searching spatially transformed text: A developmental examination.阅读和搜索空间转换文本时的眼球运动:一项发展性研究。
Mem Cognit. 1976 Jan;4(1):36-42. doi: 10.3758/BF03213252.
6
The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.阅读中词频和格交替效应对注视时间的时间进程:词汇控制眼球运动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019959.
7
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.超越库切拉和弗朗西斯:当前词频规范的批判性评估,以及美国英语新的、经过改进的词频衡量标准的引入。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.
8
Space information is important for reading.空间信息对阅读很重要。
Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(15):1994-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009. Epub 2009 May 20.
9
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.阅读、场景感知和视觉搜索中的眼动与注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
10
On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.关于阅读过程中中文词语的切分
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Jun;58(4):525-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Apr 5.