Niu Dingyi, Xie Zijian, Liu Jiaqi, Wang Chen, Zhang Ze
School of Education, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China;
School of Mathematics, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Aug 4;18(4):33. doi: 10.3390/jemr18040033. eCollection 2025 Aug.
This study utilized eye-tracking technology to explore the role of visual word segmentation cues in Tibetan reading, with a particular focus on the effects of dictionary-based and psychological word segmentation on reading and lexical recognition. The experiment employed a 2 × 3 design, comparing six conditions: normal sentences, dictionary word segmentation (spaces), psychological word segmentation (spaces), normal sentences (green), dictionary word segmentation (color alternation), and psychological word segmentation (color alternation). The results revealed that word segmentation with spaces (whether dictionary-based or psychological) significantly improved reading efficiency and lexical recognition, whereas color alternation showed no substantial facilitative effect. Psychological and dictionary word segmentation performed similarly across most metrics, though psychological segmentation slightly outperformed in specific indicators (e.g., sentence reading time and number of fixations), and dictionary word segmentation slightly outperformed in other indicators (e.g., average saccade amplitude and number of regressions). The study further suggests that Tibetan reading may involve cognitive processes at different levels, and the basic units of different levels of cognitive processes may not be consistent. These findings hold significant implications for understanding the cognitive processes involved in Tibetan reading and for optimizing the presentation of Tibetan text.
本研究利用眼动追踪技术探讨视觉词切分线索在藏文阅读中的作用,特别关注基于词典的词切分和心理词切分对阅读及词汇识别的影响。该实验采用2×3设计,比较六种条件:正常句子、基于词典的词切分(空格)、心理词切分(空格)、正常句子(绿色)、基于词典的词切分(颜色交替)和心理词切分(颜色交替)。结果显示,使用空格进行词切分(无论是基于词典的还是心理的)均显著提高了阅读效率和词汇识别能力,而颜色交替则未表现出显著的促进作用。在大多数指标上,心理词切分和基于词典的词切分表现相似,不过心理词切分在特定指标(如句子阅读时间和注视次数)上略占优势,而基于词典的词切分在其他指标(如平均扫视幅度和回视次数)上略占优势。该研究进一步表明,藏文阅读可能涉及不同层次的认知过程,且不同层次认知过程的基本单元可能不一致。这些发现对于理解藏文阅读所涉及的认知过程以及优化藏文文本的呈现具有重要意义。