Suppr超能文献

[三种技术对耐多药结核病诊断的诊断准确性]

[Diagnostic accuracy of three technologies for the diagnosis of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis].

作者信息

Alvis-Zakzuk Nelson José, Carrasquilla María De Los Ángeles, Gómez Verónica Jhajaira, Robledo Jaime, Alvis-Guzmán Nelson Rafael, Hernández José Mauricio

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación en Economía de la Salud, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia Observatorio Nacional de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.

出版信息

Biomedica. 2017 Sep 1;37(3):397-407. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v37i3.3437.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) tuberculoses are a global public health problem. Their timely detection might reduce the burden of the disease and the economic impact on health systems worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a literature review of the diagnostic accuracy of three molecular tests to detect multi-drug resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review following Cochrane methodology was carried out to study the diagnostic accuracy of three molecular tests to detect MDR-TB and XDR-TB in previous studies among immunocompetent population. Articles indexed in Medline and Embase were reviewed starting in 2007. Diagnostic accuracy was reported by sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of each test.

RESULTS

In total, 8, 12 and 13 studies were included to assess the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF®, GenoType MTBDRplus® and GenoType MTBDRsl®, respectively. The specificity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF® ranged between 91 and 100%, and its sensitivity between 33.3 and 100%. The sensitivity of GenoType® MTBDRplus® ranged between 88 and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of GenoType MTBDRsl® to evaluate drug resistance ranged between 56 and 100% and 21 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The three diagnostic tests evaluated have shown an adequate diagnostic accuracy to detect MDR and XDR tuberculoses.

摘要

引言

耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)和广泛耐药结核病(XDR-TB)是全球性的公共卫生问题。及时检测这些疾病可能会减轻疾病负担以及对全球卫生系统的经济影响。

目的

对三种用于检测耐多药和广泛耐药结核病的分子检测方法的诊断准确性进行文献综述。

材料与方法

按照Cochrane方法进行系统的文献综述,以研究三种分子检测方法在先前针对免疫功能正常人群的研究中检测耐多药结核病和广泛耐药结核病的诊断准确性。检索了从2007年起被Medline和Embase收录索引的文章。通过每种检测方法的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值来报告诊断准确性。

结果

分别纳入了8项、12项和13项研究来评估GeneXpert MTB/RIF®、GenoType MTBDRplus®和GenoType MTBDRsl®的诊断准确性。GeneXpert MTB/RIF®的特异性在91%至100%之间,敏感性在33.3%至100%之间。GenoType® MTBDRplus®的敏感性在88%至100%之间。GenoType MTBDRsl®评估耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别在56%至100%和21%至100%之间。

结论

所评估的三种诊断检测方法在检测耐多药和广泛耐药结核病方面显示出了足够的诊断准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验