Iacovino Maria Lucia, Talucci Simone, Arenare Laura, Caglio Andrea, Canciello Andrea, Salerno Flavio, Facchini Sergio, Gravina Adriano, Schettino Clorinda, Piccirillo Maria Carmela, Olimpieri Pier Paolo, Di Maio Massimo, Perrone Francesco
National Cancer Institute IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, via M. Semmola 52, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Menarini Ricerche SpA, via T. Speri 10, 00071, Pomezia, Italy.
J Transl Med. 2025 May 16;23(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06509-z.
Characteristics of patients significantly differ between registrational clinical trials (CTs) and Italian real-world practice, with older median age, higher elderly (≥ 65) rate and worse performance status (PS) in the latter, without imbalance in female rate. We compared the same characteristics between registrational phase 2/3 and phase 1 CTs.
Data on age, sex and PS were extracted from European Public Assessment Reports of European Medicines Agency. Weighted means and standard deviations were calculated in both groups and differences were described overall, by cancer type and drug class.
We collected 103 phase 2/3 and 111 phase 1 CTs, supporting 97 therapeutic indications. Age and sex were compared in 59 indications. Mean median age (SD) was 60.7 (5.1) years in phase 2/3 and 59.7 (5.6) years in phase 1 (p = 0.051). Age difference was greater for skin and breast cancer; no heterogeneity emerged among drug classes. Mean female rate was not statistically significantly lower in phase 2/3 than phase 1 CTs overall, (mean difference - 4.9%, p = 0.999); difference was greater for skin and upper-gastrointestinal cancers and for cytotoxic agents. Mean PS > 1 rate, compared in 47 indications, was similar in phase 2/3 [2.3% (4.7)] and phase 1 [1.8% (3.5)] (p = 0.374); difference was greater for colorectal cancer and cytotoxic agents.
We found no statistically significant difference in age, sex and PS between patients in phase 2/3 and corresponding phase 1 CTs for anticancer treatments. Therefore, patient selection in phase 1 trials appears crucial, considering its potential impact in later development phases.
注册临床试验(CT)与意大利实际临床实践中的患者特征存在显著差异,后者的年龄中位数更大、老年(≥65岁)比例更高、体能状态(PS)更差,而女性比例无差异。我们比较了注册2/3期和1期CT的相同特征。
从欧洲药品管理局的欧洲公共评估报告中提取年龄、性别和PS的数据。计算两组的加权均值和标准差,并总体、按癌症类型和药物类别描述差异。
我们收集了103项2/3期和111项1期CT,支持97种治疗适应症。对59种适应症进行了年龄和性别的比较。2/3期的平均年龄中位数(标准差)为60.7(5.1)岁,1期为59.7(5.6)岁(p = 0.051)。皮肤癌和乳腺癌的年龄差异更大;各药物类别之间未出现异质性。总体而言,2/3期CT的平均女性比例在统计学上并不显著低于1期CT(平均差异-4.9%,p = 0.999);皮肤癌和上消化道癌以及细胞毒药物的差异更大。在47种适应症中比较的平均PS>1比例,2/3期[2.3%(4.7)]和1期[1.8%(3.5)]相似(p = 0.374);结直肠癌和细胞毒药物的差异更大。
我们发现,在抗癌治疗的2/3期和相应的1期CT患者中,年龄、性别和PS没有统计学上的显著差异。因此,考虑到1期试验对后续开发阶段的潜在影响,1期试验中的患者选择显得至关重要。