Ginsberg Howard S, Bargar Timothy A, Hladik Michelle L, Lubelczyk Charles
USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, University of Rhode Island, RI Field Station, Woodward Hall - PSE, Kingston, RI 02881.
USGS Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 7920 NW 71st St., Gainesville, FL 32653.
J Med Entomol. 2017 Nov 7;54(6):1463-1475. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjx146.
Tick and mosquito management is important to public health protection. At the same time, growing concerns about declines of pollinator species raise the question of whether vector control practices might affect pollinator populations. We report the results of a task force of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC) that examined potential effects of vector management practices on pollinators, and how these programs could be adjusted to minimize negative effects on pollinating species. The main types of vector control practices that might affect pollinators are landscape manipulation, biocontrol, and pesticide applications. Some current practices already minimize effects of vector control on pollinators (e.g., short-lived pesticides and application-targeting technologies). Nontarget effects can be further diminished by taking pollinator protection into account in the planning stages of vector management programs. Effects of vector control on pollinator species often depend on specific local conditions (e.g., proximity of locations with abundant vectors to concentrations of floral resources), so planning is most effective when it includes collaborations of local vector management professionals with local experts on pollinators. Interventions can then be designed to avoid pollinators (e.g., targeting applications to avoid blooming times and pollinator nesting habitats), while still optimizing public health protection. Research on efficient targeting of interventions, and on effects on pollinators of emerging technologies, will help mitigate potential deleterious effects on pollinators in future management programs. In particular, models that can predict effects of integrated pest management on vector-borne pathogen transmission, along with effects on pollinator populations, would be useful for collaborative decision-making.
蜱虫和蚊子的管理对公共卫生保护至关重要。与此同时,人们对传粉物种数量下降的担忧与日俱增,这引发了一个问题,即病媒控制措施是否会影响传粉昆虫种群。我们报告了北美传粉昆虫保护运动(NAPPC)一个特别工作组的结果,该工作组研究了病媒管理措施对传粉昆虫的潜在影响,以及如何调整这些计划以尽量减少对传粉物种的负面影响。可能影响传粉昆虫的主要病媒控制措施类型包括景观改造、生物防治和农药施用。一些现行措施已经将病媒控制对传粉昆虫的影响降至最低(例如,短效农药和靶向施用技术)。在病媒管理计划的规划阶段考虑传粉昆虫保护,可以进一步减少非目标影响。病媒控制对传粉昆虫物种的影响通常取决于特定的当地条件(例如,病媒丰富的地点与花卉资源集中地的距离),因此,当地方病媒管理专业人员与当地传粉昆虫专家合作进行规划时,效果最为显著。然后可以设计干预措施以避开传粉昆虫(例如,靶向施用农药以避开开花时间和传粉昆虫筑巢栖息地),同时仍优化公共卫生保护。对干预措施的有效靶向以及新兴技术对传粉昆虫的影响进行研究,将有助于减轻未来管理计划中对传粉昆虫的潜在有害影响。特别是,能够预测综合虫害管理对病媒传播病原体传播的影响以及对传粉昆虫种群影响的模型,将有助于协同决策。