Suppr超能文献

从学习到决策:临床药师主导的期刊俱乐部横断面调查

From Learning to Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Survey of a Clinical Pharmacist-Steered Journal Club.

作者信息

Ismail Sherine, Al Khansa Sara, Aseeri Mohammed, Alhamdan Hani, Quadri K H Mujtaba

机构信息

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia.

National University of Medical Sciences, The Mall, Rawalpindi 44000, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Jan 12;5(1):3. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5010003.

Abstract

Journal clubs have been traditionally incorporated into academic training programs to enhance competency in the interpretation of literature. We designed a structured journal club (JC) to improve skills in the interpretation of literature; however, we were not aware of how learners (interns, residents, clinical pharmacists, etc.) would perceive it. We aimed to assess the perception of learners at different levels of pharmacy training. A cross-sectional design was used. A self-administered online survey was emailed to JC attendees from 2010-2014 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The survey questions included: introduction sessions, topic selection, JC layout, interaction with the moderator, and decision-making skills by clinical pharmacists. The response rate was 58/89 (65%); 52/54 (96%) respondents believed that JC adds to their knowledge in interpreting literature. Topic selection met the core curriculum requirements for credentials exams for 16/36 (44.4%), while 16/22 (73%) presenters had good to excellent interaction with the moderator. JC facilitated decision-making for 10/12 (83%) of clinical pharmacists. The results suggest that clinical pharmacist-steered JC may serve as an effective tool to empower learners at different levels of pharmacy practice, with evidence-based principles for interpretation of literature and guide informed decision-making.

摘要

传统上,学术讨论小组已被纳入学术培训项目中,以提高文献解读能力。我们设计了一个结构化的学术讨论小组(JC)来提高文献解读技能;然而,我们并不清楚学习者(实习生、住院医师、临床药师等)会如何看待它。我们旨在评估不同药学培训水平的学习者的看法。采用了横断面设计。通过电子邮件向沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城2010年至2014年参加学术讨论小组的人员发送了一份自行填写的在线调查问卷。调查问题包括:入门课程、主题选择、学术讨论小组的布局、与主持人的互动以及临床药师的决策技能。回复率为58/89(65%);52/54(96%)的受访者认为学术讨论小组增加了他们解读文献的知识。16/36(44.4%)的主题选择符合资格考试的核心课程要求,而16/22(73%)的演讲者与主持人有良好到优秀的互动。学术讨论小组为10/12(83%)的临床药师提供了决策便利。结果表明,由临床药师主导的学术讨论小组可能是一个有效的工具,可增强不同药学实践水平学习者的能力,为文献解读提供循证原则并指导明智决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3de9/5419390/3031fb3a9ed6/pharmacy-05-00003-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验