Wenke Rachel, Wiseman Jodie, Stehlik Paulina, Brandenburg Caitlin, Richards Katherine, Mickan Sharon
Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia.
Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06929-x.
Journal clubs have long been recognised as a potential tool for supporting evidence-based practice skills and culture, however they can be challenging to implement and sustain in clinical settings. While the TREAT journal club format was developed to address some of these challenges; it is unclear which strategies are most helpful in supporting ongoing sustainability. To further this enquiry, the aim of this study was to identify clinician's perspectives of the most effective implementation strategies for supporting sustainable TREAT journal club attendance, culture and satisfaction.
Clinicians, clinician-facilitators, and research mentors were recruited from six allied health journal clubs who participated in the TREAT journal club format within a single hospital and health service. Participants were invited to attend focus groups at 10 months and 16-months following participation in their journal club. Focus group questions explored which strategies participants felt were most effective during implementation of the journal club, what outcomes they led to and what if any contextual factors influenced these outcomes. Data analysis involved an inductive and deductive approach and the formation of context- mechanism-outcome configurations drawing from elements of a realist evaluation.
Eighteen focus groups were conducted separately with 47 clinician participants, 12 clinician-facilitators, and 6 research mentors. Strategies reported to be the most effective related to clinical relevance and application of the topic, group participation (i.e., group prioritisation of topics, group discussion), consistency, structure (i.e., protected time, structured appraisal tool, timetabling) and mentoring. These were further synthesised within 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations which identified contexts that influenced outcomes. For example, clinicians reported smaller and single profession journal clubs enhanced outcomes relating to attendance, culture and practice changes when implementing the strategy of discussing the article's application to practice.
Clinicians report several strategies which may enhance journal club attendance and satisfaction, EBP culture, and knowledge and skills of clinicians when implementing a TREAT journal club for up to 16-months. Findings emphasise the importance of journal club topics being identified and prioritised by clinicians as a group to maximise relevance and clinician buy-in. Strategies discussed may be useful for services to consider when implementing journal clubs, taking into consideration specific contexts.
长期以来,期刊俱乐部一直被视为培养循证实践技能和文化的一种潜在工具,然而,在临床环境中实施和维持期刊俱乐部可能具有挑战性。虽然TREAT期刊俱乐部模式的开发是为了解决其中一些挑战,但尚不清楚哪些策略对支持其持续发展最有帮助。为了进一步探究这一问题,本研究的目的是确定临床医生对于支持TREAT期刊俱乐部持续参与度、文化氛围和满意度的最有效实施策略的看法。
从六个联合健康期刊俱乐部招募临床医生、临床促进者和研究导师,这些俱乐部在一家医院和医疗服务机构内采用了TREAT期刊俱乐部模式。邀请参与者在参加期刊俱乐部后的10个月和16个月参加焦点小组讨论。焦点小组问题探讨了参与者认为在期刊俱乐部实施过程中哪些策略最有效,这些策略带来了哪些结果,以及是否有任何背景因素影响了这些结果。数据分析采用归纳和演绎方法,并根据现实主义评价的要素形成背景-机制-结果配置。
分别与47名临床医生参与者、12名临床促进者和6名研究导师进行了18次焦点小组讨论。据报告,最有效的策略与主题的临床相关性和应用、小组参与(即小组对主题的优先级排序、小组讨论)、一致性、结构(即预留时间、结构化评估工具、时间表)和指导有关。这些策略在11种背景-机制-结果配置中得到进一步综合,这些配置确定了影响结果的背景。例如,临床医生报告说,在实施将文章应用于实践的讨论策略时,规模较小且单一专业的期刊俱乐部在提高参与度、文化氛围和实践改变方面效果更好。
临床医生报告了几种策略,在实施为期16个月的TREAT期刊俱乐部时,这些策略可能会提高期刊俱乐部的参与度和满意度、循证实践文化以及临床医生的知识和技能。研究结果强调了由临床医生作为一个群体来确定和优先考虑期刊俱乐部主题的重要性,以最大限度地提高相关性和临床医生的接受度。在考虑具体背景的情况下,讨论的策略可能对各医疗机构在实施期刊俱乐部时有所帮助。