Suppr超能文献

机械弥散与心力衰竭的不良预后相关,尤其是在左心室功能严重降低和束支传导阻滞的情况下。

Mechanical dispersion is associated with poor outcome in heart failure with a severely depressed left ventricular function and bundle branch blocks.

机构信息

a Department of Cardiology, Clinical Hospital Center Zemun, Faculty of Medicine , University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2018 Mar;50(2):128-138. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2017.1387282. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bundle branch blocks (BBB)-related mechanical dyssynchrony and dispersion may improve patient selection for device therapy, but their effect on the natural history of this patient population is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 155 patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and BBB, not treated with device therapy, were included. Mechanical dyssynchrony was defined as the presence of either septal flash or apical rocking. Contraction duration was assessed as time interval from the electrocardiographic R-(Q-)wave to peak longitudinal strain in each of 17 left ventricular segments. Mechanical dispersion was defined as either the standard deviation of all time intervals (dispersion) or as the difference between the longest and shortest time intervals (dispersion). Patients were followed for cardiac mortality during a median period of 33 months.

RESULTS

Mechanical dyssynchrony was not associated with survival. More pronounced mechanical dispersion was found in patients with dyssynchrony than in those without. In the multivariate regression analysis, patients' functional class, diabetes mellitus and dispersion were independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical dispersion, but not dyssynchrony, was independently associated with mortality and it may be useful for risk stratification of patients with heart failure (HF) and BBB. Key Messages Mechanical dispersion, measured by strain echocardiography, is associated with poor outcome in heart failure with a severely depressed left ventricular function and bundle branch blocks. Mechanical dispersion may be useful for risk stratification of patients with heart failure and bundle branch blocks.

摘要

目的

束支传导阻滞(BBB)相关的机械不同步和弥散可能改善装置治疗的患者选择,但它们对该患者人群自然史的影响尚不清楚。

方法

共纳入 155 例 LVEF≤35%和 BBB 的患者,未接受装置治疗。机械不同步定义为存在间隔闪光或心尖晃动。收缩时间间隔通过心电图 R-(Q-)波至 17 个左心室节段每个节段的峰值纵向应变的时间间隔来评估。机械弥散定义为所有时间间隔的标准差(弥散)或最长和最短时间间隔之间的差异(弥散)。患者在中位 33 个月的时间内接受心脏死亡率随访。

结果

机械不同步与存活率无关。在有不同步的患者中发现更明显的机械弥散。在多变量回归分析中,患者的功能分级、糖尿病和弥散独立与死亡率相关。

结论

机械弥散,但不是不同步,与心力衰竭(HF)和 BBB 患者的死亡率独立相关,它可能对心力衰竭和 BBB 患者的风险分层有用。

关键信息

应变超声心动图测量的机械弥散与严重左心室功能障碍和束支传导阻滞的心力衰竭患者的不良预后相关。机械弥散可能对心力衰竭和束支传导阻滞患者的风险分层有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验