Zhao Xiaoying, Zhang Li, Wang Lujing, Zhang Wanqiu, Song Yujiao, Zhao Xinxiang, Li Yanli
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Dianmiandadao No. 374, Kunming, Yunnan, 650101, China.
Department of Radiology, Qujing No.1 Hospital, Kirin District Garden Road no. 1, Qujing, 655099, China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 4;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04451-4.
Left ventricular (LV) myocardial contraction patterns can be assessed using LV mechanical dispersion (LVMD), a parameter closely associated with electrical activation patterns. Despite its potential clinical significance, limited research has been conducted on LVMD following myocardial infarction (MI). This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LVMD for adverse clinical outcomes and to explore its correlation with myocardial scar heterogeneity.
We enrolled 181 post-MI patients (median age: 55.7 years; 76.8% male) who underwent CMR examinations. LVMD was calculated using the CMR-feature tracking (CMR-FT) technique, defined as the standard deviation (SD) of the time from the R-wave peak to the negative strain peak across 16 myocardial segments. Entropy was quantified using an algorithm implemented with a generic Python package. The primary composite endpoints included sudden cardiac death (SCD), sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA), and new-onset heart failure (HF).
Over a median follow-up of 31 months, LVMD and border zone (BZ) entropy demonstrated relatively high accuracy for predicting the primary composite endpoints, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.825 and 0.771, respectively. Patients with LVMD above the cut-off value (86.955 ms) were significantly more likely to experience the primary composite endpoints compared to those with lower LVMD values (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified LVMD as an independent predictor of the primary composite endpoints after adjusting for entropy parameters, strain, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.014; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.024; p = 0.010). A combined prediction model incorporating LVMD, BZ entropy, and LVEF achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.871 for the primary composite endpoints. Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed significant linear correlations between LVMD and entropy parameters (p < 0.001 for all).
Myocardial heterogeneity, as assessed by LVMD and BZ entropy, represents reliable and reproducible parameters reflecting cardiac remodeling following MI. LVMD has independent prognostic value, and the combination of LVMD and BZ entropy with the guideline-recommended LVEF as a unified model enhances the accuracy of forecasting the risk of primary combined endpoints in patients after MI.
左心室(LV)心肌收缩模式可通过左心室机械离散度(LVMD)进行评估,该参数与电激活模式密切相关。尽管其具有潜在的临床意义,但关于心肌梗死(MI)后LVMD的研究有限。本研究旨在评估心脏磁共振成像(CMR)衍生的LVMD对不良临床结局的预测价值,并探讨其与心肌瘢痕异质性的相关性。
我们纳入了181例接受CMR检查的MI后患者(中位年龄:55.7岁;76.8%为男性)。使用CMR特征追踪(CMR-FT)技术计算LVMD,定义为16个心肌节段从R波峰值到负向应变峰值时间的标准差(SD)。使用通用Python包实现的算法对熵进行量化。主要复合终点包括心源性猝死(SCD)、持续性室性心律失常(VA)和新发心力衰竭(HF)。
在中位随访31个月期间,LVMD和边缘区(BZ)熵对预测主要复合终点显示出相对较高的准确性,曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.825和0.771。LVMD高于临界值(86.955毫秒)的患者比LVMD值较低的患者更有可能经历主要复合终点(p < 0.001)。多变量分析确定LVMD在调整熵参数、应变和左心室射血分数(LVEF)后是主要复合终点的独立预测因子(风险比[HR]:1.014;95%置信区间[CI]:1.003 - 1.024;p = 0.010)。结合LVMD、BZ熵和LVEF的联合预测模型实现了最高的预测准确性,主要复合终点的AUC为0.871。Spearman等级相关分析显示LVMD与熵参数之间存在显著的线性相关性(所有p < 0.001)。
通过LVMD和BZ熵评估的心肌异质性是反映MI后心脏重塑的可靠且可重复的参数。LVMD具有独立的预后价值,将LVMD和BZ熵与指南推荐的LVEF作为一个统一模型相结合,可提高预测MI后患者主要联合终点风险的准确性。