Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Brain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jun 1;82(6):870-876. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx320.
While the utilization of neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) has become widespread in surgery for traumatic spine fractures and spinal cord injury (SCI), clinical validation of its diagnostic and therapeutic benefit has been limited.
To describe the use of intraoperative MEP at a large level I trauma center and assess the prognostic capability of this technology.
The SCI REDCap database at our institution, a level I trauma center, was queried for acute cervical SCI patients who underwent surgery with intraoperative monitoring between 2005 and 2011, yielding 32 patients. Of these, 23 patients had severe SCI (association impairment scale [AIS] A, B, C). We assessed preoperative and postoperative SCI severity (AIS grade), surgical data, use of steroids, and early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (preoperatively in 27 patients), including axial T2 MRI grade (Brain and Spinal Injury Center score).
The presence of MEPs significantly predicted AIS at discharge (P< .001). In the group of severe SCI (ie, AIS A, B, C) patients with elicitable MEPs, AIS improved by an average of 1.5 grades (median = 1), as compared to the patients without elicitable MEP who improved on average 0.5 grades (median = 0, P< .05). In addition, axial MRI grade significantly correlated with MEP status. Patients without MEPs had a significantly higher axial MRI grade in comparison to the patients with MEPs (P< .001).
In patients with severe SCI, MEPs predicted neurological improvement and correlated with axial MRI grade. These significant findings warrant future prospective studies of MEPs as a prognostic tool in SCI.
尽管在创伤性脊柱骨折和脊髓损伤(SCI)的手术中,神经生理术中监测与运动诱发电位(MEP)的应用已经广泛普及,但该技术的诊断和治疗益处的临床验证仍受到限制。
描述在大型一级创伤中心使用术中 MEP,并评估该技术的预后能力。
我们机构的 SCI REDCap 数据库,一个一级创伤中心,对 2005 年至 2011 年间接受术中监测手术的急性颈 SCI 患者进行了查询,共 32 例患者。其中,23 例患者为严重 SCI(损伤协会评分[AIS] A、B、C)。我们评估了术前和术后 SCI 严重程度(AIS 分级)、手术数据、类固醇的使用以及早期磁共振成像(MRI)发现(27 例患者术前),包括轴向 T2 MRI 分级(脑与脊髓损伤中心评分)。
MEP 的存在显著预测了出院时的 AIS(P<.001)。在可引出 MEP 的严重 SCI(即 AIS A、B、C)患者组中,AIS 平均改善 1.5 级(中位数=1),而不可引出 MEP 的患者平均改善 0.5 级(中位数=0,P<.05)。此外,轴向 MRI 分级与 MEP 状态显著相关。与有 MEP 的患者相比,没有 MEP 的患者的轴向 MRI 分级显著更高(P<.001)。
在严重 SCI 患者中,MEP 预测了神经功能的改善,与轴向 MRI 分级相关。这些重要发现需要进一步进行前瞻性研究,以评估 MEP 作为 SCI 的预后工具。