Gupta Sachin, Eksi Murat Sakir, Ames Christopher P, Deviren Vedat, Durbin-Johnson Blythe, Smith Justin S, Gupta Munish C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacra-mento, California.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Apr 1;14(4):449-456. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx151.
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can be used to treat rigid sagittal plane deformities. Nonunions and rod breakages are known complications of PSO.
To assess outcomes of 2 methods of posterior instrumentation for PSO, traditional 2 rods vs a novel 4-rod technique in which 2 additional rods span only the osteotomy level.
This study was a retrospective, radiographic review of consecutive PSOs performed at 2 centers. The primary difference in technique between the centers was the use of 4 rods including 2 independent rods attached only to the vertebral levels immediately adjacent to the PSO (group 1, n = 29 patients) vs the traditional 2-rod technique (group 2, n = 20 patients).
Demographics and preoperative to postoperative radiographic measurements were similar between the study groups, including the PSO wedge resection angle (P = .56). The rod breakage rate was 25% with 2 rods and 0% with 4 rods (P = .008), and the pseudarthrosis rate with 2 rods was 25% and with 4 rods was 3.4% (P = .035). The patient with pseudarthrosis from group 1 had an infection and developed pseudarthrosis only after instrumentation removal. Rates of other complications did not differ significantly between the study groups.
This study provides a comparison between 2 techniques for rod placement across a PSO and suggests that the described novel 4-rod technique may help to reduce the rates of pseudarthrosis and rod failure. It will be important to confirm these findings in a prospectively designed study with multiple institutions in order to better control for potentially confounding factors.
椎弓根截骨术(PSO)可用于治疗僵硬的矢状面畸形。骨不连和棒材断裂是PSO已知的并发症。
评估PSO两种后路内固定方法的疗效,即传统的双棒技术与一种新型的四棒技术,其中额外的两根棒仅跨越截骨水平。
本研究是对在两个中心连续进行的PSO手术进行的回顾性影像学分析。两个中心技术的主要差异在于使用四棒,其中包括两根仅连接到紧邻PSO的椎体水平的独立棒(第1组,n = 29例患者)与传统的双棒技术(第2组,n = 20例患者)。
研究组之间的人口统计学和术前术后影像学测量结果相似,包括PSO楔形切除角度(P = 0.56)。双棒技术的棒材断裂率为25%,四棒技术为0%(P = 0.008),双棒技术的假关节形成率为25%,四棒技术为3.4%(P = 0.035)。第1组发生假关节的患者发生了感染,仅在取出内固定后出现假关节形成。研究组之间其他并发症的发生率没有显著差异。
本研究对PSO的两种棒材放置技术进行了比较,表明所描述的新型四棒技术可能有助于降低假关节形成率和棒材失败率。在前瞻性设计的多机构研究中证实这些发现将很重要,以便更好地控制潜在的混杂因素。