Suppr超能文献

经皮射频消融联合乙醇注射与肝切除术治疗 2.1-5.0cm 单发肝细胞癌:一项回顾性对比多中心研究。

Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection versus hepatic resection for 2.1-5.0 cm solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative multicentre study.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3651-3660. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5371-9. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection (RFA-PEI) with hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with 2.1-5.0 cm diameter.

METHODS

From June 2009 to December 2015, 271 patients whom underwent RFA-PEI (n = 141) or HR (n = 130) in three centres were enrolled. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Complications, hospital stay and cost were assessed.

RESULTS

The OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 93.5%, 72.7%, 58.6% in RFA-PEI group and 82.3%, 57.5%, 51.8% in HR group (p = 0.021). The corresponding 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 65.8%, 41.3%, 34.3% in RFA-PEI group and 50.5%, 33.8%, 28.4% in HR group (p = 0.038). For patients with 2.1-3.0 cm tumours, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS after RFA-PEI and HR were 98.0%, 82.3%, 74.2% and 89.4%, 65.1%, 61.9%, respectively (p = 0.024). The corresponding RFS were 79.6%, 54.7%, 45.1% in RFA-PEI group, and 57.6%, 43.9%, 31.7% in HR group, respectively (p = 0.020). RFA-PEI was superior to HR in major complication rates, length of hospital stay and cost (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RFA-PEI had a survival benefit over HR in the treatment of solitary HCCs, especially for those with 2.1-3.0 cm in diameter.

KEY POINTS

• RFA-PEI provided superior survival to HR in solitary HCC with 2.1-5.0 cm in diameter. • RFA-PEI is superior to HR in complications, length of hospital stay and cost. • RFA-PEI might be an alternative treatment for solitary HCC within 5.0 cm in diameter.

摘要

目的

比较经皮射频消融联合无水乙醇注射(RFA-PEI)与肝切除术(HR)治疗 2.1-5.0cm 直径可切除单发肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。

方法

2009 年 6 月至 2015 年 12 月,在三个中心纳入了接受 RFA-PEI(n=141)或 HR(n=130)治疗的 271 例患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩检验比较两组的总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS)。评估并发症、住院时间和费用。

结果

RFA-PEI 组的 1、3 和 5 年 OS 率分别为 93.5%、72.7%和 58.6%,HR 组分别为 82.3%、57.5%和 51.8%(p=0.021)。RFA-PEI 组的 1、3 和 5 年 RFS 率分别为 65.8%、41.3%和 34.3%,HR 组分别为 50.5%、33.8%和 28.4%(p=0.038)。对于直径为 2.1-3.0cm 的肿瘤患者,RFA-PEI 和 HR 治疗后的 1、3 和 5 年 OS 分别为 98.0%、82.3%、74.2%和 89.4%、65.1%、61.9%(p=0.024)。相应的 RFS 分别为 79.6%、54.7%和 45.1%,57.6%、43.9%和 31.7%(p=0.020)。RFA-PEI 在主要并发症发生率、住院时间和费用方面均优于 HR(均 p<0.001)。

结论

在治疗单发 HCC 时,RFA-PEI 优于 HR,尤其是对于直径为 2.1-3.0cm 的肿瘤。

关键点

• RFA-PEI 为 2.1-5.0cm 直径单发 HCC 提供了优于 HR 的生存获益。

• RFA-PEI 在并发症、住院时间和费用方面优于 HR。

• RFA-PEI 可能是直径 5.0cm 以内单发 HCC 的一种替代治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验