Chu Chia-Chen, Liu Chin-Jung, Yen Suh-May, Chou Wen-Yu, Kung Pei-Tseng, Tsai Yuh-Show, Tsai Wen-Chen
Department of Respiratory Therapy.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Respir Care. 2017 Dec;62(12):1557-1564. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05649. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
According to Taiwan's integrated delivery system policy, ventilator-dependent patients are successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation in accordance with step-down care. However, premature discharge affects the 14-d readmission quality index. Therefore, we explored the risk and related factors of subjects liberated from mechanical ventilation who were re-intubated within 14 d.
This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of ventilator-dependent subjects 17 y of age and older using a population-based database from the Taiwan National Health Research Institutes Database from 2006 to 2010. Chi-square test and logistic regression analyses were used to explore whether subjects liberated from mechanical ventilation were re-intubated within 14 d and to investigate the related factors.
A total of 15,840 ventilator-dependent subjects were liberated from mechanical ventilation, and 449 subjects were re-intubated within 14 d; the total re-intubation rate was 2.83%. The factors related to a higher risk of re-intubation were also the reasons for ventilator use, including complications, hospital accreditation level, and the ventilator weaning care stage. A higher risk of re-intubation was identified in subjects with COPD (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.7, = .035) or pneumonia (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.07-1.86, = .02) and in subjects who stayed at a district hospital (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.48-5.01, < .001). Liberation from mechanical ventilation in the respiratory care ward and home respiratory care were associated with the highest risk of re-intubation, which was 2.32 times that of ICU subjects ( < .001).
Factors associated with re-intubation within 14 d after ventilator liberation are related to the level and quality of the care setting; thus, to prevent re-intubation, more attention should be paid to higher-risk ventilator-dependent subjects after they are liberated from mechanical ventilation.
根据台湾的整合式照护系统政策,依赖呼吸机的患者按照逐步降低护理级别成功脱离机械通气。然而,过早出院会影响14天再入院质量指标。因此,我们探讨了脱离机械通气的患者在14天内再次插管的风险及相关因素。
这项回顾性研究使用了台湾国家卫生研究院数据库2006年至2010年基于人群的数据,分析了一组17岁及以上依赖呼吸机的受试者。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析来探讨脱离机械通气的患者是否在14天内再次插管,并调查相关因素。
共有15840名依赖呼吸机的受试者脱离了机械通气,449名受试者在14天内再次插管;总再插管率为2.83%。与再插管风险较高相关的因素也是使用呼吸机的原因,包括并发症、医院认证水平和呼吸机撤机护理阶段。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者(比值比[OR]1.32,95%置信区间1.02 - 1.7,P = 0.035)或肺炎患者(OR 1.4,95%置信区间1.07 - 1.86,P = 0.02)以及在地区医院住院的患者(OR 3.53,95%置信区间2.48 - 5.01,P < 0.001)再插管风险较高。在呼吸照护病房和家庭呼吸照护中脱离机械通气与最高的再插管风险相关,是重症监护病房(ICU)受试者的2.32倍(P < 0.001)。
呼吸机撤机后14天内再次插管的相关因素与护理环境的水平和质量有关;因此,为防止再次插管,对于脱离机械通气后的高风险依赖呼吸机受试者应给予更多关注。