Suppr超能文献

并非所有慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在计划拔管后都能从预防性无创通气中获益:一项探索性研究。

Not All COPD Patients Benefit from Prophylactic Noninvasive Ventilation After Scheduled Extubation: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Gong Yan, Han Xiaoli, Duan Jun, Huang Shicong

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, People's Republic of China.

Department of Teaching Affairs, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Dec 5;14:2809-2814. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S232339. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after scheduled extubation can benefit patients with chronic respiratory disorders, among which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant example. However, it is not known whether all COPD patients benefit from prophylactic NIV.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data. COPD patients who successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled. In the prophylactic NIV group, NIV was applied immediately after extubation. In the usual care group, conventional oxygen therapy was used. Patients were followed up to 90 days post-extubation.

RESULTS

Among patients with PaCO > 45 mmHg, 128 and 40 received prophylactic NIV and usual care, respectively. Prophylactic NIV led to lower rates of re-intubation (4% vs 30% at 72 h and 11% vs 35% at 7 days, both p < 0.01) and hospital mortality (18% vs 40%, p < 0.01) than usual care. The proportion of 90-day mortality was also lower in the prophylactic NIV group (log rank test, p = 0.04). Among patients with PaCO ≤ 45 mmHg, 32 and 21 received prophylactic NIV and usual care, respectively. In this cohort however, prophylactic NIV neither reduced re-intubation (6% vs 5% at 72 h, p > 0.99, and 9% vs 14% at 7 days, p = 0.67) nor hospital mortality (19% vs 24%, p = 0.74). The proportion of 90-day mortality did not differ between the two groups (log rank test, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study shows that prophylactic NIV benefits COPD patients with PaCO > 45 mmHg, but it may not benefit those with PaCO ≤ 45 mmHg. Further study with a larger sample size is required to confirm this.

摘要

背景

计划性拔管后预防性无创通气(NIV)可使慢性呼吸系统疾病患者受益,其中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)就是一个重要例子。然而,尚不清楚所有COPD患者是否都能从预防性NIV中获益。

方法

我们对前瞻性收集的数据进行了事后分析。纳入成功完成自主呼吸试验的COPD患者。在预防性NIV组中,拔管后立即应用NIV。在常规护理组中,采用传统氧疗。对患者进行拔管后90天的随访。

结果

在动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO)>45 mmHg的患者中,分别有128例和40例接受了预防性NIV和常规护理。与常规护理相比,预防性NIV导致再插管率(72小时时为4%对30%,7天时为11%对35%,均p<0.01)和医院死亡率(18%对40%,p<0.01)更低。预防性NIV组90天死亡率的比例也更低(对数秩检验,p = 0.04)。在PaCO≤45 mmHg的患者中,分别有32例和21例接受了预防性NIV和常规护理。然而,在该队列中,预防性NIV既未降低再插管率(72小时时为6%对5%,p>0.99,7天时为9%对14%,p = 0.67),也未降低医院死亡率(19%对24%,p = 0.74)。两组之间90天死亡率的比例没有差异(对数秩检验,p = 0.79)。

结论

这项探索性研究表明,预防性NIV对PaCO>45 mmHg的COPD患者有益,但对PaCO≤45 mmHg的患者可能无益。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592e/6901037/1829ddcf26b4/COPD-14-2809-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验