• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tracheostomy is Safe in Patients with Prolonged Intubation After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.COVID-19 感染后长时间插管的患者行气管切开术是安全的。
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:361-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Short-term Outcomes for Patients and Providers After Elective Tracheostomy in COVID-19-Positive Patients.COVID-19 阳性患者择期行气管切开术的患者和医务人员的短期结局。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 in Argentina (SATICOVID): a prospective, multicentre cohort study.阿根廷 COVID-19 有创通气患者的临床特征和结局(SATICOVID):一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):989-998. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00229-0. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Is tracheostomy a better choice than translaryngeal intubation for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days? A comparison of short-term outcomes.对于需要机械通气超过14天的重症患者,气管切开术比经喉插管是更好的选择吗?短期结果比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:181. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0159-9.
5
Outcomes After Tracheostomy for Patients With Respiratory Failure due to COVID-19.因 COVID-19 导致呼吸衰竭行气管切开术患者的结局。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Jul;101(6):354-358. doi: 10.1177/0145561321993567. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Association between tracheostomy timing and outcomes for older critically ill COVID-19 patients: prospective observational study in European intensive care units.COVID-19 老年危重症患者气管切开时机与结局的相关性:欧洲重症监护病房的前瞻性观察性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;128(3):482-490. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
[Tracheostomy performed in ICU: Professional practice assessment and patient outcome].[重症监护病房中实施的气管切开术:专业实践评估与患者预后]
Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Jan;35(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2016.12.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy at the Epicenter of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Impact on Critical Care Resource Utilization and Early Outcomes.在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的震中施行经皮扩张性气管切开术:对重症监护资源利用和早期结局的影响。
Am Surg. 2021 Nov;87(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1177/00031348211058644. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Timing of tracheostomy as a determinant of weaning success in critically ill patients: a retrospective study.气管切开时机作为危重症患者撤机成功的决定因素:一项回顾性研究
Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):R46-52. doi: 10.1186/cc3018. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
10
Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City.COVID-19 患者的经皮和开放性气管切开术:纽约市机构系列的比较和结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):403-409. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004428.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Timing of Tracheostomy in the Setting of COVID-19 and Associated Pneumothorax.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)合并气胸情况下气管切开术的最佳时机
Cureus. 2024 Mar 4;16(3):e55479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55479. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Impact of Tracheostomy on COVID-19 ICU Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Analysis.气管切开术对沙特阿拉伯新冠肺炎重症监护病房患者的影响:一项回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 22;16(1):e52766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52766. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Surgical paradigm for lung injury secondary to COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎继发肺损伤的手术模式
AME Case Rep. 2023 Dec 12;8:1. doi: 10.21037/acr-23-186. eCollection 2024.
4
Laryngotracheal Complications after Intubation for COVID-19: A Multicenter Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎插管后喉气管并发症:一项多中心研究
Life (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(5):1207. doi: 10.3390/life13051207.
5
Indications and Recommendations for Tracheostomy in Trauma Population With COVID-19 Infection: A Review of the Literature.COVID-19 感染创伤患者行气管切开术的适应证和推荐意见:文献复习。
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1955-1965. doi: 10.1177/00031348211054711. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracheostomy in the coronavirus disease 2019 patient: evaluating feasibility, challenges and early outcomes of the 14-day guidance.2019冠状病毒病患者的气管切开术:评估14天指南的可行性、挑战及早期结果
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Aug;134(8):688-695. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120001759. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
Outcome of 1890 tracheostomies for critical COVID-19 patients: a national cohort study in Spain.1890 例危重新冠肺炎患者行气管切开术的结局:西班牙全国队列研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;278(5):1605-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06220-3. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection.在感染过程中对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测、病毒载量和传染性。
J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):357-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.067. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
Outcomes After Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients.COVID-19 患者行气管切开术后的结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):e181-e186. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004166.
5
Indications and timing for tracheostomy in patients with SARS CoV2-related.新型冠状病毒相关的气管切开术的适应证和时机。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2403-2404. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06068-7. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
Tracheotomy in Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)通气患者的气管切开术
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):e30-e32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003956.
7
Novel Percutaneous Tracheostomy for Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.新型经皮气管切开术用于 COVID-19 危重症患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep;110(3):1006-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
8
Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.在纽约市地区,5700 名因 COVID-19 住院的患者的特征、合并症和结局。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
9
Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic.关于 COVID-19 大流行期间安全气管切开术的实用指南推荐。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2173-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05993-x. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Tracheostomy during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Recommendations from the New York Head and Neck Society.新冠疫情期间的气管切开术:纽约头颈部学会的建议。
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1002/hed.26166. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

COVID-19 感染后长时间插管的患者行气管切开术是安全的。

Tracheostomy is Safe in Patients with Prolonged Intubation After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:361-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.023
PMID:34087619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy improves outcomes for critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Data are limited on the use and benefit of tracheostomies for intubated, critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. During the surge in COVID 19 infections in metropolitan New York/New Jersey, our hospital cared for many COVID-19 patients who required prolonged intubation. This study describes the outcomes in COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy.

METHODS

We present a case series of patients with COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy at a single institution. Tracheostomies were performed on patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation beyond 3 wk. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and ventilator settings prior to tracheostomy were reviewed. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included time on mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital stay, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Fifteen COVID-19 patients underwent tracheostomy at an average of 31 d post intubation. Two patients (13%) died. Half of our cohort was liberated from the ventilator (8 patients, 53%), with an average time to liberation of 14 ± 6 d after tracheostomy. Among patients off mechanical ventilation, 5 (63%) had their tracheostomies removed prior to discharge. The average intensive care length of stay was 47 ± 13 d (range 29-74 d) and the average hospital stay was 59 ± 16 d (range 34-103 d).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports promising outcomes in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure and need for prolonged ventilation who undergo tracheostomy during their hospitalization. Further research is warranted to establish appropriate indications for tracheostomy in COVID-19 and confirm outcomes.

摘要

背景

气管切开术可改善需要长时间机械通气的重症患者的预后。关于气管切开术在接受插管、重症 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者中的应用和益处的数据有限。在大都市纽约/新泽西州 COVID-19 感染激增期间,我们医院收治了许多需要长时间插管的 COVID-19 患者。本研究描述了接受气管切开术的 COVID-19 患者的结局。

方法

我们报告了一家机构中 COVID-19 患者的病例系列,这些患者在机械通气超过 3 周后接受了气管切开术。回顾了患者的人口统计学、合并症和气管切开术前的呼吸机设置。主要结局为院内死亡率。次要结局包括机械通气时间、重症监护病房和住院时间以及出院去向。

结果

15 名 COVID-19 患者在插管后平均 31 天接受了气管切开术。有 2 名患者(13%)死亡。我们的队列中有一半患者(8 名患者,53%)从呼吸机中解脱出来,气管切开术后平均解脱时间为 14±6 天。在脱离机械通气的患者中,有 5 名(63%)在出院前拔除了气管切开管。重症监护病房的平均住院时间为 47±13 天(范围 29-74 天),平均住院时间为 59±16 天(范围 34-103 天)。

结论

本研究报告了在住院期间接受气管切开术的急性呼吸衰竭和需要长时间通气的 COVID-19 患者的有希望的结局。需要进一步研究以确定 COVID-19 患者气管切开术的适当适应证并确认结局。