Suppr超能文献

劳拉西泮联合氟哌啶醇与单用氟哌啶醇对接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者激越性谵妄的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Lorazepam With Haloperidol vs Haloperidol Alone on Agitated Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Hui David, Frisbee-Hume Susan, Wilson Annie, Dibaj Seyedeh S, Nguyen Thuc, De La Cruz Maxine, Walker Paul, Zhukovsky Donna S, Delgado-Guay Marvin, Vidal Marieberta, Epner Daniel, Reddy Akhila, Tanco Kimerson, Williams Janet, Hall Stacy, Liu Diane, Hess Kenneth, Amin Sapna, Breitbart William, Bruera Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1047-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11468.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The use of benzodiazepines to control agitation in delirium in the last days of life is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of lorazepam vs placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol for persistent agitation in patients with delirium in the setting of advanced cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial conducted at an acute palliative care unit at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, enrolling 93 patients with advanced cancer and agitated delirium despite scheduled haloperidol from February 11, 2014, to June 30, 2016, with data collection completed in October 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Lorazepam (3 mg) intravenously (n = 47) or placebo (n = 43) in addition to haloperidol (2 mg) intravenously upon the onset of an agitation episode.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score (range, -5 [unarousable] to 4 [very agitated or combative]) from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Secondary end points were rescue neuroleptic use, delirium recall, comfort (perceived by caregivers and nurses), communication capacity, delirium severity, adverse effects, discharge outcomes, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 90 randomized patients (mean age, 62 years; women, 42 [47%]), 58 (64%) received the study medication and 52 (90%) completed the trial. Lorazepam + haloperidol resulted in a significantly greater reduction of RASS score at 8 hours (-4.1 points) than placebo + haloperidol (-2.3 points) (mean difference, -1.9 points [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.9]; P < .001). The lorazepam + haloperidol group required less median rescue neuroleptics (2.0 mg) than the placebo + haloperidol group (4.0 mg) (median difference, -1.0 mg [95% CI, -2.0 to 0]; P = .009) and was perceived to be more comfortable by both blinded caregivers and nurses (caregivers: 84% for the lorazepam + haloperidol group vs 37% for the placebo + haloperidol group; mean difference, 47% [95% CI, 14% to 73%], P = .007; nurses: 77% for the lorazepam + haloperidol group vs 30% for the placebo + haloperidol group; mean difference, 47% [95% CI, 17% to 71%], P = .005). No significant between-group differences were found in delirium-related distress and survival. The most common adverse effect was hypokinesia (3 patients in the lorazepam + haloperidol group [19%] and 4 patients in the placebo + haloperidol group [27%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this preliminary trial of hospitalized patients with agitated delirium in the setting of advanced cancer, the addition of lorazepam to haloperidol compared with haloperidol alone resulted in a significantly greater reduction in agitation at 8 hours. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01949662.

摘要

重要性

在生命的最后几天使用苯二氮䓬类药物控制谵妄时的激越状态存在争议。

目的

比较劳拉西泮与安慰剂作为辅助药物联合氟哌啶醇治疗晚期癌症患者谵妄持续激越状态的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:在德克萨斯州MD安德森癌症中心的急性姑息治疗病房进行的单中心、双盲、平行组随机临床试验,从2014年2月11日至2016年6月30日招募93例晚期癌症且尽管已按计划使用氟哌啶醇仍有激越性谵妄的患者,数据收集于2016年10月完成。

干预措施

在激越发作时,除静脉注射氟哌啶醇(2mg)外,静脉注射劳拉西泮(3mg)(n = 47)或安慰剂(n = 43)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是从基线到治疗给药后8小时里士满激越-镇静量表(RASS)评分的变化(范围:-5[无法唤醒]至4[非常激越或好斗])。次要终点包括补救性抗精神病药物的使用、谵妄回忆、舒适度(由护理人员和护士感知)、沟通能力、谵妄严重程度、不良反应、出院结局和总生存期。

结果

在90例随机分组的患者(平均年龄62岁;女性42例[47%])中,58例(64%)接受了研究药物治疗,52例(90%)完成了试验。劳拉西泮+氟哌啶醇组在给药8小时时RASS评分的降低幅度(-4.1分)显著大于安慰剂+氟哌啶醇组(-2.3分)(平均差值,-1.9分[95%CI,-2.8至-0.9];P <.001)。劳拉西泮+氟哌啶醇组所需补救性抗精神病药物的中位数(2.0mg)低于安慰剂+氟哌啶醇组(4.0mg)(中位数差值,-1.0mg[95%CI,-2.0至0];P =.009),且盲法护理人员和护士均认为该组患者更舒适(护理人员:劳拉西泮+氟哌啶醇组为84%,安慰剂+氟哌啶醇组为37%;平均差值,47%[95%CI,14%至73%],P =.007;护士:劳拉西泮+氟哌啶醇组为77%,安慰剂+氟哌啶醇组为30%;平均差值,47%[95%CI,17%至71%],P =.005)。在与谵妄相关的痛苦和生存期方面,未发现组间显著差异。最常见的不良反应是运动减退(劳拉西泮+氟哌啶醇组3例[19%],安慰剂+氟哌啶醇组4例[27%])。

结论和相关性

在这项针对晚期癌症激越性谵妄住院患者的初步试验中,与单独使用氟哌啶醇相比,氟哌啶醇联合劳拉西泮在8小时时能显著更大程度地减轻激越。需要进一步研究以评估其普遍性和不良反应。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01949662。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验