Suppr超能文献

儿科重症监护病房中用于治疗谵妄的抗精神病药物:一项系统评价

Antipsychotic Medications for Delirium Treatment in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Cavagnero Francesca, Salerno Annalisa, Rizzolli Chiara Marchegiani, Marchetto Luca, Stritoni Valentina, Tosoni Alvise, Tessari Anna, Amigoni Angela, Daverio Marco

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Paediatr Drugs. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s40272-025-00716-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pediatric delirium (PD) is a common but underdiagnosed condition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), affecting 17-66% of patients. It is associated with prolonged ventilation and hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and mortality. While nonpharmacological approaches are considered first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are used in refractory cases despite limited pediatric-specific evidence. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for PD in PICUs.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]: CRD42024504618), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published up to February 2024. Eligible studies included children aged 1 month-18 years, diagnosed with PD in the PICU using validated scales or psychiatric evaluation and receiving pharmacologic treatment. Outcomes included delirium improvement or resolution and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scale.

RESULTS

Of 7,309 records, 10 studies involving 283 patients receiving pharmacological treatment met inclusion criteria. All but one of the studies were retrospective and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Pharmacological treatment was administered to 283 patients, with the most used agents being quetiapine (36%), risperidone (20%), haloperidol (20%), and olanzapine (11%). Seven studies reported variable efficacy, with olanzapine showing significant symptom improvement in one study (olanzapine: N = 31; control: N = 28; F(1,20) = 28.62, r = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.90) and the other drugs reporting a trend toward improvement in delirium severity. Adverse events were inconsistently measured and reported throughout studies: 22 cases were reported, with QTc prolongation (11 cases) and dystonia (7 cases) being the most frequent. Dystonia was observed in patients receiving haloperidol, whereas QTc prolongation was reported in those treated with quetiapine or risperidone. Complete resolution of the events was reported in 21/22 cases and occurred after dose adjustment or treatment interruption.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological interventions for PD in PICU patients showed variable efficacy, and adverse events were reported in a minority of treated patients. The limited sample size, the only modest quality of the studies, and the lack of replication preclude definitive conclusions about the drugs' efficacy. In addition, haloperidol, risperidone, and quetiapine raised some safety concerns. Further research is needed to establish stronger evidence for the pharmacologic treatment of PD in the PICU and to address specific treatment on the basis of delirium subtype.

摘要

背景与目的

小儿谵妄(PD)在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中很常见,但诊断不足,影响17%-66%的患者。它与通气时间延长、住院时间延长、医疗费用增加及死亡率相关。虽然非药物方法被视为一线治疗,但尽管儿科特异性证据有限,药物干预仍用于难治性病例。本系统评价的目的是评估PICU中PD药物治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库[PROSPERO]:CRD42024504618),检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库中截至2024年2月发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括年龄在1个月至18岁之间、在PICU中使用经过验证的量表或精神科评估诊断为PD并接受药物治疗的儿童。结局包括谵妄改善或缓解以及安全性。使用干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)量表评估偏倚风险。

结果

在7309条记录中,10项涉及283例接受药物治疗患者的研究符合纳入标准。除一项研究外,所有研究均为回顾性研究,未识别出随机对照试验(RCT)。283例患者接受了药物治疗,最常用的药物是喹硫平(36%)、利培酮(20%)、氟哌啶醇(20%)和奥氮平(11%)。7项研究报告了不同的疗效,一项研究显示奥氮平有显著的症状改善(奥氮平:N = 31;对照组:N = 28;F(1,20) = 28.62,r = 0.77,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.50 - 0.90),其他药物报告谵妄严重程度有改善趋势。在整个研究中,不良事件的测量和报告不一致:报告了22例,其中QTc延长(11例)和肌张力障碍(7例)最为常见。肌张力障碍在接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者中观察到,而QTc延长在接受喹硫平或利培酮治疗的患者中报告。22例中有21例报告事件完全缓解,且发生在剂量调整或治疗中断后。

结论

PICU患者中PD的药物干预疗效各异,少数接受治疗的患者报告了不良事件。样本量有限、研究质量仅一般以及缺乏重复性使得无法就药物疗效得出明确结论。此外,氟哌啶醇、利培酮和喹硫平引发了一些安全问题。需要进一步研究以建立更有力的证据支持PICU中PD的药物治疗,并根据谵妄亚型进行针对性治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验