Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Int J Public Health. 2018 Apr;63(3):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1039-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
We sought to determine whether blended learning is an effective strategy for acquiring competence in public health biostatistics.
The trial was conducted with 69 Masters' students of public health attending the School of Public Health at University of Belgrade. Students were exposed to the traditional and blended learning styles. Blended learning included a combination of face-to-face and distance learning methodologies integrated into a single course. Curriculum development was guided by competencies as suggested by the Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER). Teaching methods were compared according to the final competence score.
Forty-four students were enrolled in the traditional method of education delivery, and 25 to the blended learning format. Mean exam scores for the blended learning group were higher than for the on-site group for both the final statistics score (89.65 ± 6.93 vs. 78.21 ± 13.26; p < 0.001) and knowledge test score (35.89 ± 3.66 vs. 22.56 ± 7.12; p < 0.001), with estimated large effect size (d > 0.8).
A blended learning approach is an attractive and effective way of acquiring biostatistics competence for Masters of Public Health (MPH) graduate students.
我们旨在确定混合式学习是否是获取公共卫生生物统计学能力的有效策略。
该试验在贝尔格莱德大学公共卫生学院的 69 名公共卫生硕士研究生中进行。学生接受了传统学习和混合学习两种方式。混合学习包括将面对面和远程学习方法结合到一门课程中。课程开发以欧洲地区公共卫生学校协会(ASPHER)提出的能力为指导。根据最终能力得分比较了教学方法。
44 名学生被纳入传统教育交付方式,25 名学生被纳入混合学习模式。混合学习组的期末考试成绩高于现场组,统计学成绩(89.65±6.93 对 78.21±13.26;p<0.001)和知识测试成绩(35.89±3.66 对 22.56±7.12;p<0.001)的平均分也更高,且具有较大的估计效应量(d>0.8)。
混合学习方法是公共卫生硕士(MPH)研究生获取生物统计学能力的一种有吸引力且有效的方法。