Milic Natasa M, Trajkovic Goran Z, Bukumiric Zoran M, Cirkovic Andja, Nikolic Ivan M, Milin Jelena S, Milic Nikola V, Savic Marko D, Corac Aleksandar M, Marinkovic Jelena M, Stanisavljevic Dejana M
Institute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148882. eCollection 2016.
Although recent studies report on the benefits of blended learning in improving medical student education, there is still no empirical evidence on the relative effectiveness of blended over traditional learning approaches in medical statistics. We implemented blended along with on-site (i.e. face-to-face) learning to further assess the potential value of web-based learning in medical statistics.
This was a prospective study conducted with third year medical undergraduate students attending the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, who passed (440 of 545) the final exam of the obligatory introductory statistics course during 2013-14. Student statistics achievements were stratified based on the two methods of education delivery: blended learning and on-site learning. Blended learning included a combination of face-to-face and distance learning methodologies integrated into a single course.
Mean exam scores for the blended learning student group were higher than for the on-site student group for both final statistics score (89.36±6.60 vs. 86.06±8.48; p = 0.001) and knowledge test score (7.88±1.30 vs. 7.51±1.36; p = 0.023) with a medium effect size. There were no differences in sex or study duration between the groups. Current grade point average (GPA) was higher in the blended group. In a multivariable regression model, current GPA and knowledge test scores were associated with the final statistics score after adjusting for study duration and learning modality (p<0.001).
This study provides empirical evidence to support educator decisions to implement different learning environments for teaching medical statistics to undergraduate medical students. Blended and on-site training formats led to similar knowledge acquisition; however, students with higher GPA preferred the technology assisted learning format. Implementation of blended learning approaches can be considered an attractive, cost-effective, and efficient alternative to traditional classroom training in medical statistics.
尽管最近的研究报告了混合式学习在改善医学生教育方面的益处,但在医学统计学中,关于混合式学习相对于传统学习方法的相对有效性仍缺乏实证证据。我们实施了混合式学习以及现场(即面对面)学习,以进一步评估基于网络的学习在医学统计学中的潜在价值。
这是一项前瞻性研究,对象是贝尔格莱德大学医学院的三年级医学本科生,他们在2013 - 14年期间通过了(545人中的440人)必修的基础统计学课程期末考试。学生的统计学成绩根据两种教学方式进行分层:混合式学习和现场学习。混合式学习包括将面对面和远程学习方法结合到一门课程中。
混合式学习学生组的期末考试统计学平均成绩高于现场学习学生组,最终统计学成绩(89.36±6.60对86.06±8.48;p = 0.001)和知识测试成绩(7.88±1.30对7.51±1.36;p = 0.023)均如此,效应量为中等。两组在性别或学习时长方面没有差异。混合式学习组的当前平均绩点(GPA)更高。在多变量回归模型中,调整学习时长和学习方式后,当前GPA和知识测试成绩与最终统计学成绩相关(p<0.001)。
本研究提供了实证证据,支持教育工作者为本科医学生实施不同学习环境来教授医学统计学的决策。混合式学习和现场培训形式导致了相似的知识获取;然而,GPA较高的学生更喜欢技术辅助的学习形式。混合式学习方法的实施可以被认为是医学统计学传统课堂培训的一种有吸引力、经济高效的替代方式。