Varghese Sheeja Saji, Ramesh Asha, Veeraiyan Deepak Nallaswamy
Sheeja Saji Varghese is Professor of Periodontics and HOD, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; Asha Ramesh is in Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; and Deepak Nallaswamy Veeraiyan is Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Dent Educ. 2019 Apr;83(4):445-450. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.054. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Information technology has stimulated efforts to reform teaching methods in dental education. Most of these efforts involve a shift from conventional mode to the more technology-savvy and student-centered approach. The aim of this study was to compare postgraduate dental students' academic performance using two teaching methodologies (video-based learning and blended module-based learning) in a biostatistics and research methodology course in a master's program at a dental college in India. This retrospective study involved two groups of students enrolled in the master's program with different years of admission: Group I in 2013-14 (n=80) and Group II in 2015-16 (n=80). Group I students learned the subjects with video-based learning, whereas Group II students were taught using a blended module program using a small-group learning system called Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). The students' final course evaluation (summative assessment) and formative assessment (during course assessments) were compared for the two groups. The students' final course evaluation was derived from an end-of-year written examination, whereas the formative assessment was recorded with written tests and projects during the course. In the results, the summative assessment did not show a significant difference between Group I (68.2±13.4) and Group II (66.4±11.9) (p=0.39). The formative assessment showed a significant difference (p<0.001) in favor of the Group II students. In this study, the blended module-based teaching produced similar scores on the final exam to the video-based lectures, but it produced significantly better results on the in-course assessments. The latter finding could be attributed to the incorporation of small-group learning and POGIL.
信息技术推动了牙科教育教学方法改革的努力。这些努力大多涉及从传统模式向更具技术意识和以学生为中心的方法转变。本研究的目的是在印度一所牙科学院的硕士项目的生物统计学和研究方法课程中,比较两种教学方法(基于视频的学习和混合模块式学习)对牙科研究生学业成绩的影响。这项回顾性研究涉及两组不同入学年份的硕士项目学生:2013 - 14年的第一组(n = 80)和2015 - 16年的第二组(n = 80)。第一组学生通过基于视频的学习来学习课程内容,而第二组学生则使用一种名为“过程导向型引导探究学习”(POGIL)的小组学习系统的混合模块课程进行教学。比较了两组学生的课程最终评估(总结性评估)和形成性评估(课程期间评估)。学生的课程最终评估来自年终笔试,而形成性评估则通过课程期间的笔试和项目进行记录。结果显示,总结性评估中第一组(68.2±13.4)和第二组(66.4±11.9)之间没有显著差异(p = 0.39)。形成性评估显示出有利于第二组学生的显著差异(p < 0.001)。在本研究中,基于混合模块的教学在期末考试中取得的成绩与基于视频的讲座相似,但在课程期间评估中取得了显著更好的结果。后一发现可能归因于小组学习和POGIL的纳入。