• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course.混合学习方法对研究生公共卫生课程学生学习成果的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 11;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-47.
2
Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education.传统与强化在线研究生健康专业教育项目学生成果比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7.
3
Evaluation of student outcomes in online vs. campus biostatistics education in a graduate school of public health.评估公共卫生研究生院在线与校园生物统计学教育中学生的学习成果。
Prev Med. 2013 Feb;56(2):142-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
4
Effects of Improving Primary Health Care Workers' Knowledge About Public Health Services in Rural China: A Comparative Study of Blended Learning and Pure E-Learning.提升中国农村基层医疗卫生工作者公共卫生服务知识的效果:混合式学习与纯电子学习的比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 1;19(5):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6453.
5
Comparison of blended versus traditional classrooms among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.本科护生混合式教学与传统课堂教学比较的准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
6
Is blended learning a viable option in public health education? A case study of student satisfaction with a blended graduate course.混合式学习在公共卫生教育中是一种可行的选择吗?一项关于学生对混合式研究生课程满意度的案例研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000342945.25833.1d.
7
Blended learning is an effective strategy for acquiring competence in public health biostatistics.混合学习是公共卫生生物统计学能力获取的有效策略。
Int J Public Health. 2018 Apr;63(3):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1039-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
E-learning for self-management support: introducing blended learning for graduate students - a cohort study.电子学习支持自我管理:为研究生引入混合学习 - 一项队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1328-6.
9
The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course.混合式学习解剖课程中学生对在线内容的参与度与学习成绩之间的关系。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):471-477. doi: 10.1002/ase.1761. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Evaluation of a flipped classroom approach to learning introductory epidemiology.评估翻转课堂在学习基础流行病学中的应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1150-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医学教育中的翻转课堂:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 13;27:e60757. doi: 10.2196/60757.
2
Blended Learning in Bachelor's Nursing Education: Exploring Student Experiences, Satisfaction, and Knowledge.护理学学士学位教育中的混合式学习:探索学生体验、满意度与知识掌握情况
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jul 9;16:1197-1207. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S520500. eCollection 2025.
3
Different Methods of Teaching and Learning Dental Morphology.牙体形态学的不同教与学方法。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;12(4):114. doi: 10.3390/dj12040114.
4
Relationship between technology acceptance model, self-regulation strategies, and academic self-efficacy with academic performance and perceived learning among college students during remote education.远程教育期间大学生的技术接受模型、自我调节策略、学业自我效能感与学业成绩及感知学习之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1227956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227956. eCollection 2023.
5
Public Health Graduate Students' Longitudinal Perceptions of Remote Learning Challenges and Career Goals During an Ongoing Public Health Crisis.公共卫生危机期间公共卫生专业研究生对远程学习挑战和职业目标的纵向认知
Pedagogy Health Promot. 2023 Sep;9(3):161-171. doi: 10.1177/23733799221143379. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review.翻转课堂对提高本科健康专业教育学习成果的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;19(3):e1339. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1339. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Effect of Technology Acceptance on Blended Learning Satisfaction: The Serial Mediation of Emotional Experience, Social Belonging, and Higher-Order Thinking.技术接受对混合式学习满意度的影响:情绪体验、社会归属感和高阶思维的连续中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054442.
8
Dependence of learning outcomes in flipped and lecture classrooms on review questions: A randomized controlled trial and observational study.翻转课堂和传统课堂中学习成果对复习题的依赖性:一项随机对照试验和观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0279296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279296. eCollection 2022.
9
The use of a technology-assisted and teacher-supervised online discussion platform to promote academic progress in blended embryology courses.利用技术辅助和教师监督的在线讨论平台来促进混合胚胎学课程的学业进步。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03890-x.
10
Teaching Social Marketing Using E-Service Learning Amidst Health and Humanitarian Crises: A Case Study from Lebanon.利用电子服务学习在健康和人道主义危机中教授社会营销:来自黎巴嫩的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912696.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates.面授、混合式和电子学习的效果和可接受性:正畸本科生的随机试验。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2011 May;15(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00651.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
2
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
3
Education. Farewell, lecture?教育。告别讲座?
Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):50-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1168927.

混合学习方法对研究生公共卫生课程学生学习成果的影响。

Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, 314 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 11;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-47.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-47
PMID:24612923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3975233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blended learning approaches, in which in-person and online course components are combined in a single course, are rapidly increasing in health sciences education. Evidence for the relative effectiveness of blended learning versus more traditional course approaches is mixed.

METHOD

The impact of a blended learning approach on student learning in a graduate-level public health course was examined using a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group design. Exam scores and course point total data from a baseline, "traditional" approach semester (n = 28) was compared to that from a semester utilizing a blended learning approach (n = 38). In addition, student evaluations of the blended learning approach were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in student performance under the blended learning approach (final course point total d = 0.57; a medium effect size), even after accounting for previous academic performance. Moreover, student evaluations of the blended approach were very positive and the majority of students (83%) preferred the blended learning approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Blended learning approaches may be an effective means of optimizing student learning and improving student performance in health sciences courses.

摘要

背景

混合式学习方法将面对面和在线课程组件结合在单个课程中,在健康科学教育中迅速增加。混合式学习与更传统的课程方法相比的相对有效性的证据参差不齐。

方法

使用准实验、非等效对照组设计,检查了混合式学习方法对研究生公共卫生课程中学生学习的影响。比较了采用混合式学习方法(n=38)的学期与采用传统方法(n=28)的学期的考试成绩和课程总分数据。此外,还评估了学生对混合式学习方法的评价。

结果

即使考虑到先前的学业成绩,混合式学习方法下学生的表现有统计学上的显著提高(最终课程总分 d = 0.57;中等效果大小)。此外,学生对混合方法的评价非常积极,大多数学生(83%)更喜欢混合学习方法。

结论

混合式学习方法可能是优化健康科学课程中学生学习和提高学生表现的有效手段。